Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 2

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Purpose: Many printers are tempting at low prices, but later their accuracy turns out to be insufficient. The study has included checking the accuracy of printing and reproducing details of 3D printers used in dental technology and dentistry such as MultiJet Printing (ProJet MP3000, 3D Systems) and Fused Deposition Modelling (Inspire S2000, Tiertime). Design/methodology/approach: The 3D prints were created from scans of the maxillary gypsum model with the loss of left premolar. In the test, objects were set to the X and Y-axis. In order to check the dimensional differences after printing, scans of the printed models were superimposed on scans of the plaster model in the GOM Inspect V8 SR1 (Braunschweig, Germany). The focus was on the distance of scans from each other and a deviation map was created for each object. Findings: The average absolute value of deviations for each of models were equalled: FDM- for X-axis 0.06 ± 0.04 mm, for Y-axis 0.07 ± 0.04 mm; MJP- for X-axis- 0.04 ± 0.02 mm, for Y-axis- 0.06 ± 0.02 mm. A chart of arithmetic averages calculated for each tooth for the best printouts in each series show that higher deviation values exist in case of FDM printout. The models printed in the X-axis have smaller values of deviations from those printed in the Y-axis. Practical implications: MultiJet Printing technology can be used to create more precise models than the FDM, but these printouts meet the requirements of dimensional accuracy too. Originality/value: CAD / CAM technology in the future will exist in every dental technology laboratory so it is important to be aware of the way the 3D printers works. By paying attention to the quality of detail reproduction, a Dental Technician is able to choose the best 3D printer for them.
EN
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyse attempts at improving the bond between acrylic artificial teeth and the denture base plate - considered in the context of single incisors in framework denture. Design/methodology/approach: It is a review article focusing on the analysis of state of the art in the field of the bond between the polymerised acrylic (teeth) and the polymerising acrylic resin during the production of denture (denture plate). Previous works regard the issue of individual incisor teeth (both upper and lower) breaking off from the metal partial denture. Findings: The bond between artificial acrylic teeth and the acrylic denture plate of the prosthesis was discussed. Ways of improving this bond were also presented. Although researchers and companies offer many methods for improving this bond, none of them refer directly to the issue discussed in this article. In conclusion- the hitherto scientific achievements work well in the case of acrylic prostheses without a metal frame, which constitutes an obstacle for achieving the effect required. In this work, it is suggested that further research would not only develop and provide more detail on the issue of the bond between artificial teeth and the denture plate, but also solve the problem appearing in cases of metal partial denture. Originality/value: This article shows a significant problem that hasn’t been discussed in detail in the past.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.