Wyniki wyszukiwania - BazTech

1

Quantitative comparison of marker attachment methods for hand motion analysis

Lee K. S., Jung M.- C.

International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics

|

2015

|

Vol. 21, No. 1

30--38

EN

The purpose of this study was to compare and quantify the angle difference among marker attachment methods for kinematic evaluation. For static evaluation, a hand mock-up was designed and used in single trials of different marker attachment methods. The mean absolute angle difference between the marker attachment methods and hand mock-up was not statistically significant. For dynamic evaluation, the gripping task began when a participant gripped a cylinder. The main effect of the marker set (p < .049) was significant. Thus, the use of one marker per joint is recommended for static evaluation because it causes less discomfort when a patient moves his/her hand and because utilizing the same marker placements for each subject is easy. For dynamic evaluation, the use of three markers per segment or a cluster marker is recommended because they are less affected by skin movement.

2

Age and sex differences in ranges of motion and motion patterns

Hwang J., Jung M.- C.

International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics

|

2015

|

Vol. 21, No. 2

173--186

EN

This study investigated the effects of age and sex on joint ranges of motion (ROMs) and motion patterns. Forty participants performed 18 motions using eight body segments at self-selected speeds. Older subjects showed smaller ROMs than younger subjects for 11 motions; the greatest difference in ROM was 44.9% for eversion/inversion of the foot. Older subjects also required more time than younger subjects to approach the peak angular velocity for six motions. In contrast, sex significantly affected ROMs but not motion patterns. Male subjects exhibited smaller ROMs than female subjects for four motions; the greatest sex-dependent difference in ROM was 29.7% for ulnar/radial deviation of the hand. The age and sex effects depended on the specific segments used and motions performed, possibly because of differences in anatomical structures and frequencies of use of the joints in habitual physical activities between the groups.

3

Flexion and Extension Angles of Resting Fingers and Wrist

Lee K.-S., Jung M.- C.

International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics

|

2014

|

Vol. 20, No. 1

91--101

EN

This study determined flexion and extension angles of resting fingers and wrist in terms of forearm posture (neutral, pronation and supination) and shoulder flexion (0°, 45°, 90° and 135°). The participants participated in 12 angle measurements for 16 finger joints and wrist. The finger joints flexed more in supination than in neutral posture and pronation and the thumb flexed more than the other fingers because of the gravity and skin tension. This phenomenon became more apparent as the shoulder flexed. The carpometacarpal joint had the largest flexion angle in the thumb joints, whereas the proximal interphalangeal joints had the largest flexion angles in the other finger joints. The resting posture of the wrist extended of ~16° in any forearm postures when the shoulder was at 0°. The results of this study could be useful for rehabilitation tool and product designs.