Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 1

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Introduction: In this article, the effectiveness of two commercial metal artifact reduction algorithms, Siemens iMAR and GE MARS, in computed tomography (CT) imaging is evaluated. Metal artifacts, which arise primarily due to the presence of high atomic number metals in clinical imaging, significantly degrade image quality and impede accurate diagnostics. Material and methods: The study compares monoenergetic and dual-energy CT reconstruction algorithms by examining their performance on phantom models, including a Gammex Tissue Characterization Phantom and a custom-made spine stabilization system phantom. Quantitative assessments, such as Hounsfield unit analysis were performed. Results: The results show that the iterative reconstruction algorithm (iMAR) from Siemens offers superior artifact suppression and image clarity compared to GE’s dual-energy algorithm (MARS), particularly in cases involving titanium implants. Quantitative assessments, such as Hounsfield unit measurements and visual image analysis, confirm that iMAR produces images with reduced artifacts and more consistent tissue characterization. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the choice of artifact reduction algorithm has a profound impact on the diagnostic and planning accuracy of CT scans in patients with metal implants.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.