We investigate and compare the descriptional power of unary probabilistic and nondeterministic automata (pfa's and nfa's, respectively). We show the existence of a family of languages hard for pfa’s in the following sense: For any positive integer d, there exists a unary d-cyclic language such that any pfa accepting it requires d states, as the smallest deterministic automaton. On the other hand, we prove that there exist infinitely many languages having pfa’s which from one side do not match a known optimal state lower bound and, on the other side, they are smaller than nfa’s which, in turn, are smaller than deterministic automata.
2
Dostęp do pełnego tekstu na zewnętrznej witrynie WWW
We show that, for any ε> 0, there exists a language accepted in strong ĺźlog n space by a 2-way deterministic Turing machine working with a single binary worktape, that cannot be accepted in sublogarithmic weak space by any pebble machine (i.e., a 2-way nondeterministic Turing machine with one pebble that can be moved onto the input cells). Moreover, we provide optimal unary lower bounds on the product of space and input head reversals for strong and weak pebble machines accepting nonregular languages.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.