Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Powiadomienia systemowe
  • Sesja wygasła!
  • Sesja wygasła!

Znaleziono wyników: 2

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  thyroid disease diagnosis
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Early and accurate diagnosis of thyroid disorders is essential due to their prevalence and health impact. To enhance interpretability in clinical settings, we propose a comprehensive workflow for transparent thyroid disease prediction using a multiclass classification problem with five diagnostic categories. A dataset of 9172 samples with 31 features was used to train various machine and deep learning models. A dual-layered framework combining Feature Selection (ETC, MI, RFE) and Explainable AI (SHAP, LIME) improved performance and transparency. Gradient Boosting achieved the highest accuracy (0.97). SHAP explained global feature influence, while LIME clarified individual predictions. Our approach supports interpretable, reliable AI-based diagnostic tools for thyroid disorder classification.
2
Content available remote Boosting, bagging and fixed fusion methods performance for aiding diagnosis
EN
Multiple classifier fusion may generate more accurate classification than each of the constituent classifiers. The aim was to examine the ensemble performance by the comparison of boosting, bagging and fixed fusion methods for aiding diagnosis. Real-life medical data set for thyroid diseases recognition was applied. Different fixed combined classifiers (mean, average, product, minimum, maximum, and majority vote) built on parametric and nonparametric Bayesian discriminant methods have been employed. No very significant improvement of recognition rates by a fixed classifier combination was achieved on the examined data. The best performance was obtained for resampling methods with classification trees, for both the bagging and the boosting combining methods. The bagging and the boosting logistic regression methods have proven less efficient than the bagging or the boosting of neural networks. Difference between the bagging and the boosting performance for the examined data set was not obtained.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.