Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 2

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  surrogate models
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
EN
This paper addresses computationally feasible multi-objective optimization of antenna structures. We review two recent techniques that utilize the multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) working with fast antenna replacement models (surrogates) constructed as Kriging interpolation of coarse-discretization electromagnetic (EM) simulation data. The initial set of Pareto-optimal designs is subsequently refined to elevate it to the high-fidelity EM simulation accuracy. In the first method, this is realized point-by-point through appropriate response correction techniques. In the second method, sparsely sampled high-fidelity simulation data is blended into the surrogate model using Co-kriging. Both methods are illustrated using two design examples: an ultra-wideband (UWB) monocone antenna and a planar Yagi-Uda antenna. Advantages and disadvantages of the methods are also discussed.
2
Content available remote Forging preform shape optimization using surrogate models
EN
Forging of practical products from simple billet shapes is a complex and nonlinear process due to the multi-disciplinary phenomenon of material flow and processing conditions. General forgings are usually produced in a number of stages in order to avoid defects such as underfill, extra flash, voids, and folds. In spite of advancements in analysis techniques, forging process simulations do not provide function sensitivity information. Hence, the research focuses on exploring efficient non-gradient based preform shape optimization methods. In this research, an attempt is made to develop a preform shape design technique based on interpolative surrogate models, namely Kriging. These surrogate models yield insight into the relationship between output responses and input variables and they facilitate the integration of discipline-dependent analysis codes. Furthermore, error analysis and a comparison between Kriging and other approximation models (response surface and multi-point approximations) are presented. A discussion about what the results mean to a designer is provided. A case study of an automotive component preform shape design is presented for demonstration.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.