Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Powiadomienia systemowe
  • Sesja wygasła!

Znaleziono wyników: 1

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  static buildup model
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Pulsating high-gradient magnetic separation (PHGMS) is a promising method of separating chalcopyrite from other minerals with similar floatability. However, the capture characteristics of chalcopyrite in the PHGMS process remain poorly understood. In this study, the difference in the capture capacity of chalcopyrite and hematite, a typical weak magnetic mineral, was theoretically compared. The effects of the key operating parameters, i.e., magnetic induction, slurry flow rate, and magnetic wire diameter, on the capture difference between chalcopyrite and hematite, were investigated through experimental verification. The comparison results showed that chalcopyrite shared a similar capture trend with hematite. The capture mass weight of the matrix decreased with an increase in the pulsating frequency, slurry flow rate, and magnetic wire diameter, but it increased with improved magnetic induction. However, chalcopyrite exhibited a smaller capture mass weight due to its lower susceptibility, which required a higher magnetic induction (1.4 T), slower flow rate (1.5 cm/s), lower pulsating frequency (150 rpm), and smaller matrix diameter (1 mm) for higher efficient recovery of chalcopyrite. As the magnetic induction increased from 0.8 T to 1.6 T, the chalcopyrite recovery improved from 65.84% to 75.80%. These findings provide valuable information for improving the utilization of chalcopyrite.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.