Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 4

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  small sample
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Due to intricate operating conditions, including structural clearances and assembly deviations, the acquisition of test data for the landing gear retraction mechanism is limited, posing challenges for reliability analysis. To solve the problem, a Bayesian-based reliability analysis methodfusing prior and test data is proposed, focusing on the mechanism kinematic accuracy under small-sample conditions. Firstly, a dynamic simulation model is established to collect prior data, and retraction tests are conducted to obtain test data. Then, based on Bayesian theory, the motion accuracy parameter estimation model integrating prior and test samples is established. To obtain accurate hyper parameters, the prior samples are expanded using the neural network. Finally, taking the retraction mechanism as the research object, the kinematic accuracy reliability is quantified, and the impact of uncertainty factors is analysed in depth. The results show that the proposed method is superior to the classical interval estimation method in stability and effectively mitigates the impact of uncertainty factors.
EN
Estimation of probabilities from empirical data samples has drawn close attention in the scientific community and has been identified as a crucial phase in many machine learning and knowledge discovery research projects and applications. In addition to trivial and straightforward estimation with relative frequency, more elaborated probability estimation methods from small samples were proposed and applied in practice (e.g., Laplace’s rule, the m-estimate). Piegat and Landowski (2012) proposed a novel probability estimation method from small samples Eph√2 that is optimal according to the mean absolute error of the estimation result. In this paper we show that, even though the articulation of Piegat’s formula seems different, it is in fact a special case of the m-estimate, where pa = 1/2 and m = √2. In the context of an experimental framework, we present an in-depth analysis of several probability estimation methods with respect to their mean absolute errors and demonstrate their potential advantages and disadvantages. We extend the analysis from single instance samples to samples with a moderate number of instances. We define small samples for the purpose of estimating probabilities as samples containing either less than four successes or less than four failures and justify the definition by analysing probability estimation errors on various sample sizes.
EN
In this paper small punch test (SPT) which is one of miniaturized samples technique, was employed to characterize the mechanical properties of carbon steel P110. The tests were carried out in the range of -175°C to RT. Results obtained for SPT were compared to those calculated for tensile and Charpy impact test. Based on tensile and SPT parameters numerical model was prepared. 8 mm in diameter and 0.8 mm in height (t) discs with and without notch were employed in this research. The specimens had different depth notch (a) in the range of 0.1 to 0.4 mm. It was estimated that α factor for comparison of Tsp and DBTT for carbon steel P110 is 0.55 and the linear relation is DBTT = 0.55TSPT. The numerical model fit with force – deflection curve of SPT. If the factor of notch depth and samples thickness is higher than 0.3 the fracture mode is transformed from ductile to brittle at -150°C.
EN
The EMEA-CHMP guideline on clinical trials in small populations considers problems associated with clinical trials, when there are very few patients available to study. In such conditions, less conventional and/or less common methodological approaches may be acceptable. In the present report, selected strategies for approaches to trials in small populations are briefly outlined. It focuses on Chapter 6 of the guideline – Methodological and statistical considerations. Methods are addressed, that may increase the efficiency of the design or analysis of a trial where large studies are not feasible. In addition to general principles, specific examples of published studies are presented.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.