The study is research and development by utilizing the ex post facto approach. The research area is at the KM. Gunung Dempo. The research information was collected using a questionnaire method and then analyzed using evaluative analysis techniques via descriptive-quantitative analysis. This study is evaluative research with N-Gain. The data were collected through questionnaires and interviews. Valid data in the validity test results can be used for research. Two items of data were found to be invalid during the validity test. Result of N-Gain was 0.766 which was in high category, meaning that implementation of system model changed into suitable and powerful to enhance understanding. Result of t-test showed that t for statistical test was 93.398 with significance level = 0.000 (p<0.05), meaning that the model was effective. Drill Program implemented is in a good category. Correlation coefficient of pre-test and post-test was 0.878. Result of N-Gain was 0.766 which was in high category, meaning that implementation of Training application system version turned into top and powerful to enhance learning. Result of t-test showed that t for statistical test was 93.398 with significance level = 0.000 (p<0.05), meaning that the model was effective.
This work is the result of research carried out by an initiative group in the city of Rivne to assess the accessibility of the transport environment for people with disabilities. The rights of people with disabilities to access transport services were researched by studying the accessibility of vehicles for people with disabilities. The monitoring was carried out by means of questionnaire method, conducted survey, registration (observation) and expert evaluation. The questionnaire was attended by 100 people, among them: disabled people with diseases of the musculoskeletal system (20 people); visually impaired people (28 people); hearing impaired people (22 people); parents of children with cerebral palsy and autism (30 people). The monitoring results are presented in the form of graphs, tables and diagrams. Based on the expert assessment, a summary table of recommended indicators for evaluating the accessibility of transport system elements was obtained. A list of priority measures was proposed to create an accessible urban transport environment. The results of the monitoring are the basis for further investigation of the problem of transportation of people with disabilities.
The paper addresses complex evaluation of safety culture in Slovak manufacturing enterprises by utilizing specific determinants. To accommodate conditions of enterprises in Slovakia, a specific research method was developed for the study of safety culture, which can also be used for manufacturing and non-manufacturing enterprises. We have selected the questionnaire method. Due to the scope of the research, we have defined ten determinants, which form the basis for evaluation of safety culture elements. When determining the level of the specific ten determinants of safety culture, we studied interdependence between the enterprise’s industry, its size (small, medium, large) and points assigned to each determinant. The results of the study are evaluated using a 3D point graph. The discussion shows parts that were evaluated the highest or lowest and outlines suggested approaches to improve the current state.
The possibility of construction disputes can be reduced, but they cannot be avoided due to the uncertain and risky nature of the building industry. Conflicts between construction parties often have very unfavourable effects, such as cost increases, poor construction quality and time extension in the schedule. Lots of studies have been carried out in order to try and avoid these disagreements. However, there are no common resolution tools or techniques due to the improving conditions and scope of contracted works. Advanced methods and dispute reasons should be fully monitored and updated for the applicable solutions. This paper discusses the current major constructional dispute reasons in Turkey. The questionnaire method was applied within the scope of this study. The questionnaire documents were randomly distributed to 80 contractors to analyse major dispute reasons in Turkey. Analysis of the questionnaire results indicates that the major current dispute causes are poor quality of performed works, delays in progress payments, inefficient site management, poorly written contracts and design mistakes.
PL
Prawdopodobieństwo sporów budowlanych może zostać obniżone, jednakże nie można ich uniknąć, ze względu na niepewną i ryzykowną naturę przemysłu budowlanego. Konflikty pomiędzy stronami inwestycji często mają bardzo niekorzystny wpływ, taki jak wzrost kosztów, słaba jakość konstrukcji oraz wydłużenia czasowe w harmonogramie. W celu uniknięcia tych nieporozumień, przeprowadzono wiele badań. Jednakże, nie ma wspólnych narzędzi lub technik rozwiązywania tych problemów, ze względu na poprawiające się warunki oraz zakres prac budowlanych. Metody zaawansowane oraz powody sporów powinny być w pełni monitorowane i aktualizowane pod kątem stosownych rozwiązań. Niniejsza praca omawia obecne, główne powody sporów budowlanych w Turcji. W zakresie niniejszej pracy zastosowano metodę ankietowania.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.