Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 2

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  precast connection
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The aim of this article is to present a method of assessing the load-bearing capacity of prefabricated large-panel buildings built after the 1950s. Since the main problem in the existing large-panel system buildings is the actual condition of the joints between the panels, it was decided to investigate their impact on the behavior of the entire structure. Therefore, analyses were carried out in which the influence of the adopted connection models on the static and dynamic behavior of the building was examined. Several calculation models of the building were analyzed using three different types of connections between wall and ceiling panels: rigid, elastic and hinged, each representing a distinct state of the actual connection. The criterion used for the comparisons were the values of extreme internal forces and static displacements as well as the dynamic responses of the structure. The parameters that have the greatest influence on the static and dynamic analyses’ results are described and commented on in the conclusion. The analyses’ results are supported by data obtained from source materials: inspection reports, case studies and technical documents. The research helps to understand better the static and dynamic behavior of a building erected using a system of prefabricated large-size panels and to determine the main parameters of the structure influencing this behavior. However, as a result of the research, it was found that changes in the state of panel connection in large-panel system buildings do not have such a significant impact on the overall static and dynamic responses of the structure as initially expected.
EN
In order to withstand challenges such as earthquakes, it is important to appropriately design the beam-to-column connection of precast structures. Numerous precast connections were designed to be used worldwide to attain satisfactory seismic performance. The failures observed for many beam-column connections were primarily due to the brittle behaviour of poor connection details between the precast concrete members. This review article examines past experimental studies which used hybrid precast connections comprised of three types: (1) dry and wet connections with steel sections (Type I), (2) composite concrete (Type II), and (3) composite concrete and steel sections (Type III). The seismic performance behaviour of these connection types was evaluated and compared with that of the monolithic connections. The analysis showed that both the dry semi-rigid and rigid connections Type I can be implemented in the seismic zones. In addition, most of the wet connections Type I, Type II, and Type III can simulate the behaviour of monolithic rigid connections. Therefore, the wet connections Type I, Type II, and Type III can withstand high seismic excitations. Overall, the performance of hybrid dry connection Type I can be improved by using strengthening technique methods in the connection to maintain the continuity of the PC beam. Moreover, the use of composite materials with and without the steel sections as connector elements in the connection (Type II and Type III) can be a feasible method to simulate the seismic performance of monolithic connections.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.