Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 1

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  porównanie procedur oceny
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Purpose: The aim of the research was a comparative analysis of the back lumbar load assessment using three methods: two with continuous input data and evaluation procedures based on mathematical relationships (ShiftBack, 3DSSPP) and one method with categorized input data and tabular load estimation procedures (REBA). Methods: For the analysis, work activities and the value of applied force were selected. Among the analyzed 24 work activities were those during which there was a symmetrical load, as well as those during which the applied force or the assumed position of the body caused a lack of load symmetry. Results: The results show that the REBA method differentiates 24 cases of unit load into six levels, while the other two methods provide 24 different values between cases. Cases differing in load even over 100%, when assessed according to the 3DSSPP or ShiftBack do not differ in the assessment of REBA. Differences in the assessment of the same tasks between the results obtained from 3DSSPP and ShiftBack that were above 15% concern only 7 cases. Conclusions: A comparative analysis of the assessment of the lumbar part of the back using three methods indicates strong correlations between the results of the assessment carried out using 3DSSPP and ShiftBack. Smaller relationships were demonstrated by comparing these two methods with the REBA method.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.