Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 3

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  nuclei segmentation
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Accurate nuclei segmentation is a critical step for physicians to achieve essential information about a patient’s disease through digital pathology images, enabling an effective diagnosis and evaluation of subsequent treatments. Since pathology images contain many nuclei, manual segmentation is time-consuming and error-prone. Therefore, developing a precise and automatic method for nuclei segmentation is urgent. This paper proposes a novel multi-task segmentation network that incorporates background and contour segmentation into the nuclei segmentation method and produces more accurate segmentation results. The convolution and attention modules are merged with the model to increase its global focus and enhance good segmentation results indirectly. We propose a reverse feature enhance module for contour extraction that facilitates feature integration between auxiliary tasks. The multi-feature fusion module is embedded in the final decoding branch to use different levels of features from auxiliary segmentation branches with varying concerns. We evaluate the proposed method on four challenging nuclei segmentation datasets. The proposed method achieves excellent performance on all four datasets. We found that the Dice coefficient reached 0.8563±0.0323, 0.8183±0.0383, 0.9222±0.0216, and 0.9220±0.0602 on the TNBC, MoNuSeg, KMC, and Glas. Our method produces better boundary accuracy and less sticking than other end-to-end segmentation methods. The results show that our method can perform better than other proposed state-of-the-art methods.
EN
One of the most popular methods in the diagnosis of breast cancer is fine-needle biopsy without aspiration. Cell nuclei are the most important elements of cancer diagnostics based on cytological images. Therefore, the first step of successful classification of cytological images is effective automatic segmentation of cell nuclei. The aims of our study include (a) development of segmentation methods of cell nuclei based on deep learning techniques, (b) extraction of some morphometric, colorimetric and textural features of individual segmented nuclei, (c) based on the extracted features, construction of effective classifiers for detecting malignant or benign cases. The segmentation methods used in this paper are based on (a) fully convolutional neural networks and (b) the marker-controlled watershed algorithm. For the classification task, seven various classification methods are used. Cell nuclei segmentation achieves 90% accuracy for benign and 86% for malignant nuclei according to the F-score. The maximum accuracy of the classification reached 80.2% to 92.4%, depending on the type (malignant or benign) of cell nuclei. The classification of tumors based on cytological images is an extremely challenging task. However, the obtained results are promising, and it is possible to state that automatic diagnostic methods are competitive to manual ones.
EN
Modern cancer diagnostics is based heavily on cytological examinations. Unfortunately, visual inspection of cytological preparations under the microscope is a tedious and time-consuming process. Moreover, intra- and inter-observer variations in cytological diagnosis are substantial. Cytological diagnostics can be facilitated and objectified by using automatic image analysis and machine learning methods. Computerized systems usually preprocess cytological images, segment and detect nuclei, extract and select features, and finally classify the sample. In spite of the fact that a lot of different computerized methods and systems have already been proposed for cytology, they are still not routinely used because there is a need for improvement in their accuracy. This contribution focuses on computerized breast cancer classification. The task at hand is to classify cellular samples coming from fine-needle biopsy as either benign or malignant. For this purpose, we compare 5 methods of nuclei segmentation and detection, 4 methods of feature selection and 4 methods of classification. Nuclei detection and segmentation methods are compared with respect to recall and the F1 score based on the Jaccard index. Feature selection and classification methods are compared with respect to classification accuracy. Nevertheless, the main contribution of our study is to determine which features of nuclei indicate reliably the type of cancer. We also check whether the quality of nuclei segmentation/detection significantly affects the accuracy of cancer classification. It is verified using the test set that the average accuracy of cancer classification is around 76%. Spearman’s correlation and chi-square test allow us to determine significantly better features than the feature forward selection method.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.