Wyniki wyszukiwania - BazTech

1

Przykład analizy wyboru rodzaju nawierzchni do budowy dróg rowerowych i pieszych w terenie o charakterze rekreacyjnym

Szczuraszek P.

Przegląd Komunikacyjny

|

2016

|

Nr 6

4--12

PL

W artykule autor przedstawił przykład metody wyboru rodzaju nawierzchni do budowy dróg rowerowych i pieszych polegającej na wielokryterialnej analizie porównawczej. Następnie wybrano rodzaje nawierzchni, które najczęściej są stosowane w Europie i na Świecie oraz porównano je na podstawie przyjętych wcześniej kryteriów dotyczących charakterystyk funkcjonalnych, technicznych i ekonomicznych. W dalszej części dokonano wyboru optymalnego rodzaju nawierzchni dla konkretnego ciągu rowerowego położonego w terenie o charakterze rekreacyjnym Analogicznie dokonano wyboru optymalnego rodzaju nawierzchni na ciągach pieszych. Na podstawie rzetelnych wyników analiz autor sformułował wnioski, które mogą być pomocne także przy doborze rodzajów nawierzchni dla ciągów rowerowych i pieszych dla innych podobnych inwestycji.

EN

In the article author present a proposed method of assessing different types of segregated cycle facility and footway surfaces basing on multiple-criteria decision analysis. Subsequently, surface types most commonly used in Europe as well as around the world were chosen and compared basing on the previously established criteria regarding functional, technical and economical characteristics. Further on, an optimal surface type was chosen for a specific segregated cycle facility located in a recreational area. Similarly, an optimal surface type for footways was chosen. Basing on the reliable results of the analyses, author formulated conclusions which can be helpful in choosing the appropriate surface type for segregated cycle facilities and footways in different but similar projects.

2

Multicriteria Evaluation of Managerial Competences: An Application of the Dominance Principle and the Rough Set Theory

Couto A. B. G., Gomes L.F.A.M

Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences

|

2014

|

Vol. 39, No. 3

157--174

EN

This study demonstrates an analysis of executives based on their management competences. The aim of the study is to identify those executives that show a greater strategic alignment with the guidelines set by an organization. The analysis is performed using self-evaluation and corporate evaluation by considering each management competence as a criterion. It makes use of the Dominance principle (i.e., the Dominance based Rough Set Approach, denoted here as DRSA). The use of DRSA permits the inference of decision rules and identifies the revisions that violate that principle. The main advantage for an organization from using this procedure (i.e., DRSA and RST) is offering the organizational decision makers a comprehensive analysis of their executives. As a major result, training programs aligned to the expectations and needs of the organization can be developed and implemented.

3

Very Fast Non-Dominated Sorting

Smutnicki C., Rudy J., Żelazny D.

Decision Making in Manufacturing and Services

|

2014

|

Vol. 8, no. 1-2

13--23

EN

A new and very efficient parallel algorithm for the Fast Non-dominated Sorting of Pareto fronts is proposed. By decreasing its computational complexity, the application of the proposed method allows us to increase the speedup of the best up to now Fast and Elitist Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) more than two orders of magnitude. Formal proofs of time complexities of basic as well as improved versions of the procedure are presented. The provided experimental results fully confirm theoretical findings.

4

Scenario planning + MCDA procedure for innovation selection problem

Michnik J.

Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences

|

2013

|

Vol. 38, No. 3

207--220

EN

Selecting the proper set of innovation projects is the vital point of the innovation management in a firm. To make a good decision, managers have to consider many conflicting objectives in a highly uncertain environment. In this article, the comprehensive decision procedure based on scenario planning and multiple criteria analysis is presented. The main part of the procedure is a two-step model in which Hurwicz's rule and VIKOR-S method are employed to gain the selection of alternatives. To build up the decision base, the classification of the criteria involved in the innovation project selection into five categories is proposed.

5

Multiple criteria decision support model for competent research consortium building

Małachowski B., Zaikin O.

Management and Production Engineering Review

|

2011

|

Vol. 2, No. 3

40-51

EN

The article presents an analysis of the process of project consortium building and proposes a decision-making method of project members and their role selection using multiple criteria hierarchical model. The study is based on the current rules of participation in European Union research initiatives.