Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Powiadomienia systemowe
  • Sesja wygasła!

Znaleziono wyników: 2

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  knee function
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The objective of the study was assessment of the function of the knee joint after ACL reconstruction using the LARS method and autogenous graft. The study was of a retrospective character and included 96 patients who had undergone reconstruction of the torn ACL. The study was conducted within 36–48 months after surgery. Methods: In order to compare the results of the ACL reconstruction performed with 2 types of grafts, the following instruments were used: Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, SF 36v2 questionnaire for assessment of health-related quality of life, and Biodex System 4 for isokinetic muscle testing. Results: No differences in the evaluation of the quality of life measured using SF 36v2 questionnaire were observed between the LARS and ST GR groups. Using the Lysholm Scale, the distribution of knee function scores was compared according to the type of surgery. There are no grounds to confirm the differences in the distribution of knee function scores considering the type of graft ( p = 0.756). Isokinetic test showed a significant weakening of muscle strength in the operated limb, compared to the strength of the healthy limb. Conclusions: The type of graft used for ACL reconstruction does not exert an effect on the quality of life of patients or the level of their knee joint function. Extensor and flexor muscles strength of the knee joint was lower in the operated limb, irrespective of the type of graft used. Weak relationships were observed between the level of knee joint function and extensor muscle strength of this joint.
EN
The aim of the study was to assess static balance after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), using gracialis tendons graft (GR) or semi-tendinosus (ST), compared to patients treated with the Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS). The study was performed within 36 to 48 months after the surgery. Methods: The study included 96 patients. The LARS group consisted of 44 patients, control group operated with ST/GR tendons included 52 patients. The stabilometric platform Alpha was used to assess the static balance. Two 30-second trials in the double-leg stance position with eyes opened and closed were performed. The distribution of loads in a free standing was also assessed. Results: In the test with open eyes the subjects from the LARS group had a significantly longer center of pressure (COP) path, a higher mean velocity, a greater mean COP sway in foot in the lateral direction and a larger path area occupied by the COP graph. During the tests with eyes closed, a significant difference occurred in the mean displacement of COP in lateral direction – greater in the LARS group. In addition, all parameters deteriorated during the tests with eyes closed in both groups. Conclusions: In static balance assessed with eyes closed, more proprioceptive deficits may appear in the LARS group.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.