Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 2

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  iterative architecture
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Salsa20 is a 256-bit stream cipher that has been proposed to eSTREAM, ECRYPT Stream Cipher Project, and is considered to be one of the most secure and relatively fastest proposals. This paper describes hardware implementation of various architectures of this cipher in popular Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGA). The implemented architectures are based on the loop-unrolled data flow organization and after pipelining they can reach the throughput in the range of 20 – 30 Gbps even after fully automatic implementation in popular low-cost families of Spartan-3 and Spartan-6 from Xilinx. More resource-limited iterative architectures achieve speed of 1 – 2 Gbps. The results that are included in this work present potential of the algorithm when it is implemented in a specific FPGA environment and provide some information for evaluation of cipher effectiveness in contemporary popular programmable devices.
EN
In this paper we discuss hardware implementations of the two best ciphers in the AES contest – the winner Rijndael and the Serpent – in low-cost, popular Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGA). After presenting the elementary operations of the ciphers and organization of their processing flows we concentrate on specific issues of their implementations in two selected families of popular-grade FPGA devices from Xilinx: currently the most common Spartan-6 and its direct predecessor Spartan-3. The discussion concentrates on differences in resources offered by these two families and on efficient implementation of the elementary transformations of the two ciphers. For case studies we propose a selection of different architectures (combinational, pipelined and iterative) for the encoding units and, after their implementation, we compare size requirements and performance parameters of the two ciphers across different architectures and on different FPGA platforms.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.