Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 3

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  innowacja otwarta
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
1
EN
Background: As the terms innovation, innovation strategy and especially cooperative innovation strategy are owned and discussed by many business disciplines, they can have various definitions. But a defined innovation strategy is the first step to enable a generation of innovation in a constant way. There are different approaches how a strategy can be defined. One common approach of an innovation strategy which includes the idea of an exploratory and cooperative strategy is the Open Innovation method. It describes three possible cooperation archetypes of an organization and its environment. Caused by the increased importance of startups and their innovation approaches a transfer of the common Open Innovation approach to a cooperation between established organization and startups is the aim of this article and results in the description of the startup orientated cooperative innovation (SOCI) strategy. Methods: This article gives at first an introduction in the topic of innovation and innovation strategy and its different approaches. The Open Innovation approach is described and in a further step the transfer to the new framework of (SOCI) strategies is presented. Result: As a result, the paper presents a new framework for three archetypes of SOCI-strategies. Three archetypes of SOCI-strategies were identified, by relating the three archetypes of Open Innovation to cooperations between established companies and startups. The three SOCI-strategies are: Buy/rent a startup, spin-off and startup in coupled process. Conclusion: The SOCI framework can be seen as a helpful to categorized cooperations between established companies and startups in context of generation innovation and gives an overview which archetypes of startup cooperations are possible.
2
Content available remote Innovation process management
EN
Purpose: of the article is to present selected problems of innovation management. Indication of the growing interdisciplinary and the complexity of that issue and requirement of having an extensive knowledge from the scope of the management. The other purpose is a synthetic presentation of differences in approach to managing innovations. The additional purpose is to present benefits which are the effect of efficient managing innovations. They are described based on examining processes of preparing the production. The topicality of the subject matter results from the fact that it is projecting to a considerable degree onto the competitiveness of businesses. However the large variability is forcing surroundings to seek organizational new solutions. Design/methodology/approach: For the need of achieving presented purposes, studies on literature concerning managing innovations were undertaken. Special attention was paid to development processes of new releases. At the same time in chosen manufacturing companies they conducted pilot researches (interviews, conversations with the technical divisions’ management staff). Those researches enabled to recognize approaches toward the discussed subject matter as well as to find out solutions applied in processes of preparing the production and effects obtained from this title. Findings: Studies on literature are showing that there is a number of innovation management models as well as of managing development processes of new releases. It is explicitly hard to show better solutions and to recommend them for individual enterprises. All of them have the determined merits and demerits. They are reweighing demand-induced models. A complexity of suggested solutions grows. Examined enterprises apply own models embracing outside organizations, stakeholders and consumers more and more often. At the same moment they require a modern organization. Research limitations/implications: The preliminary findings introduced in the general form requires systematizing and deepening. Further researches are necessary, particularly in the development processes of new releases. Practical implications: Both theoretical as well as practical arrangements concerning managing innovations and obtained effects are emphasizing meaning of this subject matter for the structure of the strong competitive position. Therefore building elastic models enabling the efficient management is needed. Originality/value: The main value of this article is to show issues of managing innovations as the matter requiring parallel apply of modern tools assisting change management, knowledge management, project management etc.
PL
W artykule omówiono pojęcie „jednostki badawczo-rozwojowej” i zaprezentowano wiodące jednostki w Europie oraz ich działalność na przestrzeni lat. Scharakteryzowano grupę czynników i tendencji występujących w Europejskiej Przestrzeni Badawczej, takich jak na przykład globalizacja, otwarta innowacja, badania podstawowe i stosowane, tzw. czynnik „chiński”. Przedstawiono dwa hipotetyczne scenariusze rozwoju i przyszłości jbrów w ERA.
EN
In the article the term Research and Technology Organisations has been defined. The development of biggest organizations in Europe have been presented as well as main factors and trends occuring at the European Reserach Area, like globalization, open innovation, chinese factors, basic and applied research. Two hypothetical scenarios of the future of RTO’s have been described.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.