Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 2

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  illegal exploitation of minerals
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
PL
W prezentowanej glosie podjęto się oceny prawidłowości stanowiska wyrażonego w wyroku WSA w Gliwicach, dotyczącego prowadzenia wydobycia piasku celem zaspokojenia potrzeb własnych, oraz zasadności ustalenia opłaty podwyższonej w przypadku gdy kopalina nie była wywożona ani sprzedawana. Podzielając stanowisko WSA w Gliwicach, podkreślono znaczenie dokonanej w nim wykładni pojęcia „wydobycie kopaliny” w praktyce postępowań administracyjnych dotyczących ustalenia opłaty podwyższonej.
EN
The paper assesses the correctness of the position expressed in the judgment of the Voivodeship Administrative Court in Gliwice concerning the extraction of sand in order to meet your own needs as well as the legitimacy of the determination of an increased fee if the extracted mineral was not exported or sold. While approving the judgement given by the court, the importance of its interpretation of „mineral extraction" in the practice of administrative proceedings concerning the determination of an increased fee was also stressed. In addition, the consequences of extracting sand and gravel by a natural person from real estate being their object of property (perpetual usufruct) in order to meet their own needs, in violation of the requirements set forth in Article 4 sec. 1 and item 2 of the Act – Geological and Mining Law, were analysed. It was indicated that in the case of extraction violating the requirements given in these provisions, the party conducting extraction activities should expect that the mining supervisory authority will impose an increased fee pursuant to Article 4 sec. 3 of the aforementioned Act. The court stressed that even though the extraction of sand to satisfy your own needs is subject to „light" regimes provided for in the Act, it is still subject to the restrictions contained therein.
PL
Artykuł, na tle uregulowań prawnych, prezentuje działania podejmowane przez organy nadzoru górniczego w celu wypracowania metod i zasad jednolitego postępowania w sprawach nielegalnego pozyskiwania kopalin w Polsce. Przedstawia również dane statystyczne odnoszące się do problematyki nielegalnej eksploatacji i opisuje utrudnienia w naliczaniu opłaty podwyższonej, których źródłem są przepisy innych ustaw pozwalające na obejście przepisów Prawa geologicznego i górniczego.
EN
Mining supervision authorities have participated in proceedings concerning cases of illegal extraction of minerals only since 2012, when the Geological and Mining Law obliged them to issue decisions ordering the suspension of unlicensed activities. Between 2012 and 2014, they issued a total of 281 such decisions. Since 2015, these authorities are competent for charging the increased fee. Between 2015 and 2018, they issued 435 decisions within this respect, imposing fees for a total amount of PLN 99.8 million. In cases of attempts to circumvent the Geological and Mining Law based on other administrative decisions, such as building permits, fees are charged based on the amount of minerals extracted as a result of activities extending beyond them. In order to suport regional mining authorities in this respect, the State Mining Authority (Polish: Wyższy Urząd Górniczy – WUG), among other activities, developed and then updated the methodology of conducting proceedings in such cases, specifying such aspects the method of gathering evidence, documentation specimen for the amount of mineral extracted, the method of determining the specific gravity of the mineral, and the principle of joint and several liability of offenders. With the support of the National Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management (NFEP&WM), it equipped employees of Regional Mining Authorities (Polish: Okręgowy Urząd Górniczy – OUG) with equipment that guarantees reliable preparation of evidence. The course of 48 cases filed against the President of WUG with the Voivodeship Administrative Court in Gliwice in the years 2015–2018, out of which the court recognized the arguments of the appealing party in only 4 cases, may serve as a testimony to the high standards of procedures introduced in mining authorities and to the high competences of their employees. However, in order to effectively eliminate unlicensed extraction, it is still necessary to analyse experiences concerning the functioning of regulations and propose new legislative solutions in this respect (e.g. simplifying the process of obtaining licences for land-bound minerals).
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.