Wyniki wyszukiwania - BazTech

Ograniczanie wyników

1 Nukleonika

1 2015

Znaleziono wyników: 1

Liczba wyników na stronie

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych: hydrophilic poly-N-dentate ligands

Sortuj według:

Ogranicz wyniki do:

Determination of formation constants of uranyl(VI) complexes with a hydrophilic SO3-Ph-BTP ligand, using liquid-liquid extraction

Steczek L., Narbutt J., Charbonnel M. -C., Moisy P.

Nukleonika

2015

Vol. 60, No. 4, part 2

821--827

Complex formation between uranyl ion, UO2 2+, and a hydrophilic anionic form of SO3-Ph-BTP4– ligand, L4–, in water was studied by liquid-liquid extraction experiments performed over a range of the ligand and HNO3 concentrations in the aqueous phase, at a constant concentration of nitrate anions at 25°C . The competition for UO2 2+ ions between the lipophilic TODGA extractant and the hydrophilic L4– ligand leads to the decrease in the uranyl distribution ratios, D, with an increasing L4– concentration. The model of the solvent extraction process used accounts – apart from uranyl complexation by TODGA and SO3-Ph-BTP4– – also for uranyl complexation by nitrates and for the decrease in the concentration of the free L4– ligand in the aqueous phase, due to its protonation, bonding in the uranyl complex and the distribution between the two liquid phases. The unusually strong dependence of the D values on the acidity, found in the experiment, could hardly be explained as due to L4– protonation merely. Three hypotheses were experimentally tested, striving to interpret the data in terms of additional extraction to the organic phase of ion associates of protonated TODGA cation with either partly protonated anionic L4– ligands or anionic UO2 2+ complexes with NO3 – or L4–. None of them has been confi rmed. The analysis of the results, based on the formal correction of free ligand concentrations, points to the formation of 1 : 1 and 1 : 2 uranyl – SO3-Ph-BTP complexes in the aqueous phase. The conditional formation constant of the 1:1 complex has been determined, logβL,1 = 2.95 ± 0.15.