Wyniki wyszukiwania - BazTech

1

Służby ochrony zabytków w Polsce – usytuowanie prawne od 1918 r. do dziś, persp ektywa zmian od 2017 r.

Dąbrowski Jacek

Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego

|

2016

|

Nr 1

31--40

EN

In Poland, protection of historic monuments and sites is nearly one hundred years old and it has got a highly distinctive feature – the more recent the events are, the more frequent and more profound changes can be observed; the most significant ones take place in the 1990s . in general, it can be said that the organisation of historic preservation service remained constant at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries. Administrative bodies responsible for historic preservation are still organised under the act of 23 July 2003 on Protection and Guardianship of monuments and Sites. this organisational system, however, is no longer fully effective in Poland. It is therefore necessary to change legislation under which the vertical organisational structure of conservation administration would be restored - with one General historic Preservation officer (being still the secretary or undersecretary of state in the ministry of culture and national heritage) to whom several regional historic preservation officers are directly responsible and subordinate. members of staff of the ministry of culture and national heritage undertook a legislative initiative aimed at achieving this objective. as a result, on 25 January 2016 the government decided to begin works amending the act on Protection and Guardianship of monuments and Sites.

2

Krajobraz kulturowy jako kategoria zabytków i jego specyfika

Klupsz Lidia

Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego

|

2016

|

Nr 2

41--56

EN

Cultural landscape is the most recently established category of historic sites. It has been functioning in Poland since 1990 and was mentioned for the first time in UNESCO documents in 1992. Its dual structure distinguishes it from other typology groups. As per the definition provided in the act of law, cultural landscape is an area shaped by natural factors and human activities. This field covers not only natural elements but also products of civilization. Clear and unambiguous criteria for classifying cultural landscapes according to the results of their valorisation have not been implemented into historical preservation yet. This results in difficulties in preserving and protecting cultural landscapes in Poland. Under the provisions of the European Landscape Convention, Polish government is obliged to take actions aimed at assessing landscape values. Therefore, there is a chance to resolve the stalemate.

3

Działania Kościoła Rzymskokatolickiego w Polsce w zakresie ochrony zabytków

Czernik Zbigniew

Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego

|

2016

|

Nr 1

15--30

EN

It has always been of tremendous importance for latin church to protect and preserve cultural heritage which it has been collecting and creating for ages. Particular attention is therefore paid to take care of, preserve, and conserve historic monuments and sites as well as to ensure they hold the right place in cult and liturgy. in the past, this approach was reflected not only in documents produced by church (both general and particularistic ones) but also in carrying out works to historic monuments and sites. church in Poland has always aimed its actions at providing monuments and sites with good care. Participants of the Polish episcopal conference and members of Diocesan synods made a considerable number of legal regulations. a church system of historic preservation service has been developed for years; an abundance of works are carried out to historic monuments and sites; there are church institutions collecting and listing properties and sites as well as supervising protection-related activities and cooperating with selected government bodies.

4

Czy Wawel można nadbudować?Refleksje na temat klasyfikacji zabytków

Dąbrowski Jacek, Jankowski Dariusz

Ochrona Dziedzictwa Kulturowego

|

2016

|

Nr 2

15--26

EN

None of the legal acts applied in the Polish monument protection system, ranging from the Regency Council Decree of 1918 to the Act of 2003, allows for transforming historic monuments and sites. This provision applies, paradoxically, unless a competent historic preservation officer approves such transformations. In other words, under the aforementioned acts, it is possible to make any modification to the existing historic monument or site, provided that a historic preservation officer issues an appropriate permit. Each of these legal acts provides framework for classifying historic monuments and sites, e.g. by introducing various forms of protection, classifying monuments and sites under various categories – immovable, movable, archaeological, etc. Therefore, classification is real. There are so many different historic monuments and sites falling under a great number of categories that it is impossible to provide them with real, even diversified protection. It is therefore necessary to implement such a classification of historic monuments and sites that would allow state and regional historic preservation officers and representatives of local government administration to carry out actions aimed at protecting properties and places of great historical significance. The recommended classification is a starting point for discussing methods, criteria, and rules governing classification of historic monuments and sites. Additionally, it will ensure appropriate protection.