The group formation has been widely investigated since it is a crucial aspect to perform collaborative work. However, there is no consensus about the best set of metrics or how to combine student's characteristics to improve group interactions, so it has been considered a challenge. Aiming to cope with that, this work proposes the use of case-based reasoning to suggest groups for collaboration based on the metrics and previous groups' performances stored in a case base. We gathered data from students working on collaborative tasks to build a case base and ran a grouping experiment in a class of undergraduates to verify the effectiveness of the proposal. The results evidenced that grouping based on the Big Five improved students' interactions.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.