Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Powiadomienia systemowe
  • Sesja wygasła!

Znaleziono wyników: 1

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  ensemble simulations
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
EN
This study evaluates the performance of several bias correction techniques applied to CMIP6 precipitation simulations over Sudan for the period 1991-2014, using the high-resolution CHIRPS observational dataset as a reference. Four widely used bias correction methods: Empirical Quantile Mapping (EQM), Gamma Quantile Mapping (Gamma-QM), Local Intensity Scaling (LOCI), and the Delta Method were applied to ten CMIP6 models to assess their ability to reduce systematic biases and improve consistency with observed climatology. The raw simulations reveal pronounced seasonal biases, characterized by overestimation during the pre-monsoon season (MAM) and underestimation during the monsoon season (JJAS), whereas annual biases are moderate but exhibit notable spatial heterogeneity. Among the tested techniques, EQM and Gamma-QM consistently yield the most effective corrections, achieving median bias reductions of 94-100% across both annual and seasonal timescales, and markedly enhancing Kling–Gupta Efficiency (KGE) values. Among the evaluated models, EC-Earth3, GFDL-ESM4, and INMCM4-8 demonstrate the best performance annually and during June-September, whereas NESM3 performs better during MarchMay, highlighting model-specific strengths in simulating seasonal precipitation variability. Spatial analyses further confirm that bias corrections effectively align precipitation variability with observations, with statistically significant improvements across most regions of Sudan. These findings highlight the critical role of quantile-based correction methods in producing reliable CMIP6 precipitation outputs over Sudan and establish a robust framework for assessing both model skill and bias correction performance in regions characterized by complex, seasonally varying rainfall regimes.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.