Wyniki wyszukiwania - BazTech

Ograniczanie wyników

Powiadomienia systemowe

Sesja wygasła!

Znaleziono wyników: 2

Liczba wyników na stronie

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych: elite

Sortuj według:

Ogranicz wyniki do:

Nagrobek Stanisława Staszica a polityka wizerunkowa Towarzystwa Warszawskiego Przyjaciół Nauk

Getka-Kenig Mikołaj

Kwartalnik Historii Nauki i Techniki

2021

T. 66, nr 3

31--49

The article is devoted to the artistic setting of Stanisław Staszic’s (1755-1826) burial place, for which his main heir, the Warsaw Royal Society of the Friends of Sciences (TKWPN), was responsible. The inspiration to raise this topic was the discovery of two previously unknown Jakub Tatarkiewicz’s designs of Staszic’s unrealized neoclassical tombstone in the collections of the Central Archives of Historical Records in Warsaw (AGAD). However, the projects were never commissioned by TKWPN but were the sculptor’s proposal. By analysing the relationship between these artistic projects and the initiatives concerning Staszic’s tomb which stemmed directly from the Society (a big raw stone as memorial), the article highlights the problem of TKWPN’s participation in creating the posthumous cult of its long-time president and most important benefactor. The TKWPN’s seemingly paradoxical reluctance to glorify Staszic by means of traditional (artistic) forms of commemoration can be interpreter as a logical action calculated to benefit the Society’s image. Therefore, focusing on this single aspect of the posthumous cult of Staszic, directly related to the TKWPN, this article refers to the image-building policy of this institution, and thus to the ways of building its social status. At the same time, it tackles the issue of the prestige of science and scientific patronage as a new (from the early 19th-century perspective) form of public merit.

Zmiany w układzie sił na Kremlu w latach 2007-2016

Olszanecka N.

Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Sztuki Wojennej

2017

nr 4(109)

85--98

Celem niniejszego artykułu jest udzielenie odpowiedzi na pytanie: jak zmieniała się elita władzy w Rosji w latach 2007–2016 i kto podejmuje najważniejsze decyzje w państwie. Do udzielenia odpowiedzi na to pytanie zostanie wykorzystany model „Politbiuro 2.0”. Jest to schemat zaproponowany przez Minchenko Consulting, zgodnie z którym współcześnie najważniejsi decydenci w Rosji zasiadają w Radzie Bezpieczeństwa FR, stworzonej na wzór radzieckiego Biura Politycznego.

The purpose of this article is to answer the question as to how the Russian elite changed between 2007 and 2016 and who made the most important decisions in the state. To answer this question, I will use the “Politburo 2.0” model. This is a scheme proposed by Minchenko Consulting, according to which the most important decision makers in Russia today sit on the Security Council of the Russian Federation, modelled on the Soviet Political Bureau.