Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 1

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  electron backscatter
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
EN
We provide a comparison of two independent methods used to determine the K concentration of potassium feldspar extracts from sand-sized lacustrine, colluvial, and aeolian sediments. The two methods being compared are gas-flow beta counting and imaging microprobe X-ray fluorescence analysis. Imaging analysis demonstrated that the proportion of potassium feldspar grains in a K-feldspar extract varied from a low of 7% to a high of 84%. All extracts included a significant proportion of quartz, and some also contained a few plagioclase feldspar grains. However, the K2O concentration in individual potassium feldspar grains of all eight extracts examined was within the range of 15.5 š 0.7 % K2O by weight. The K2O concentrations in four of five extracts, measured using gas-flow beta counting, were significantly lower than this value. This reflects the dilution effect of significant amounts of non-K bearing grains in these extracts. This difference can result in up to an 80% underestimate in the internal beta dose rate of a potassium feldspar grain. A 14% underestimate in the total dose rate to potassium feldspar grains, and therefore a 14% overestimate in sediment ages determined by luminescence dating of nominally pure potassium feldspar extracts is thus possible. We suggest that gas-flow beta counting is suitable for the determination of K concentrations of bulk sediments and therefore the external beta dose rate, but that internal beta dosimetry is best performed by imaging microprobe X-ray analysis. An alternative, inexpensive approach would be to assume a 15.5 š 0.7 % K2O concentration for all nominal K-feldspar extracts separated using a heavy liquid with specific gravity of 2.58 gźcm-3, and use this value to determine the internal beta dose rate. Internal beta dose rate errors incurred with this approach are expected to be significantly less than those incurred by the small sample gas-flow beta counting method.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.