Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Powiadomienia systemowe
  • Sesja wygasła!

Znaleziono wyników: 2

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  dopasowanie nieliniowe
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
PL
Porównano właściwości adsorpcyjne mezoporowatej krzemionki MCF oraz krzemionki koloidalnej (Aerosil®) wobec lidokainy jako modelowego leku miejscowo znieczulającego. Przeprowadzono matematyczną interpretację procesu adsorpcji, stosując modelowe izotermy Langmuira, Jovanovicia oraz Dubinina i Raduszkiewicza. Wykazano (izoterma Langmuira), że krzemionka MCF charakteryzuje się ponad dwukrotnie większą pojemnością adsorpcyjną (193,4 mg/g) wobec leku aniżeli krzemionka koloidalna (92,1 mg/g). Stosowane adsorbenty wykazały niewielką wydajność adsorpcji lidokainy w środowisku acetonitrylu, zaś dominującą siłą oddziaływania leku z powierzchnią krzemionek była adsorpcja fizyczna.
EN
Licodaine was adsorbed from its solns. in MeCN on a mesoporous MCF silica and colloidal Aerosil. A math. description of the adsorption process was performed using the Langmuir, Jovanovic and Dubinin-Radushkevich model isotherms. MCF silica was characterized by twice the adsorption capacity (193.4 mg/g) as compared to colloidal silica (92.1 mg/g). Used adsorbents revealed low adsorption capacity towards lidocaine in MeCN. Phys. adsorption was the main force of the drug-silica surface interactions.
EN
Purpose: To determine the most suitable reduction data method and the optimal fitting method for the Garofalo equation. Two fitting methods were applied. The input data for this fitting are the sets of forming variables {T,σ,ε’} which have been obtained by using four different reduction methods. This procedure is applied to an ultrahigh carbon steel (UHCS). Design/methodology/approach: High temperature torsion tests have been carried out on the UHCS. A wide range of forming variables have been used. A numerical method has been implemented for the experimental data reduction. The fitting of the Garofalo equation has been carried out by means of two numerical methods. An integral method in stages, called RCR method, and a method based on Matlab algorithms called NLD. A comparative analysis of the parameters of the Garofalo equation has been conducted. Findings: The results show that the n and Q parameters are not dependent of the conversion method that has been used, Von Mises, Tresca or Eichinger. However, the α and A parameters seem to depend on the reduction method. Regarding the fitting, the RCR method is quick and efficient and its results, at the first stage, are close to the ones obtained by the NLD method. The evolution of the fitting parameters with strain for each conversion and fitting method has been determined. Research limitations/implications: The evolution of the parameters of the Garofalo equation are influenced by the adiabatic heating that occurs during the torsion testing. It is necessary a correct experimental design to obtain a suitable grid of data which allows an accurate determination of the strain rate sensitivity and the strain hardening coefficient. Practical implications: The fitting of the Garofalo equation for different strain values can provide information on the microscopic processes that take place during deformation. Originality/value: This work is a comparative study of the usual reduction methods and shows the utility of a method for the fitting of the Garofalo equation. This method is convergent, quick and accurate.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.