Wyniki wyszukiwania - BazTech

1

Ocena skuteczności ochrony krajobrazu w parkach kulturowych w Polsce

Marcinek Roman, Myczkowski Zbigniew, Siwek Andrzej

Wiadomości Konserwatorskie

|

2021

|

Nr 66

106--120

PL

Różnorodność krajobrazu to także wielość i różnorodność form ochrony jego struktury i piękna. Trwa ona od ponad 150 lat w świecie i ponad 100 lat w Polsce. Od 20 lat ogniskuje się wokół krajobrazu kulturowego i jego ustawowej formy ochrony, jaką jest park kulturowy. Po wprowadzeniu możliwości ich tworzenia, w wojewódzkich strategiach wytypowano przeszło 200 obszarów. Obecnie ich liczba waha się w granicach 40. Proces jest dynamiczny, ponieważ już w roku 2021 odnotowano likwidację jednego, a równocześnie pojawiają się uchwały samorządowe dla utworzenia kilku kolejnych. W artykule autorzy, w ślad za opracowaną przez nich obszerną ekspertyzą powstałą w Narodowym Instytucie Dziedzictwa, poddają analizie istniejące parki kulturowe, cele ich powołania, treści uchwał, z mocy których powstały, zapisy planów ochrony oraz praktyki ich funkcjonowania. Ocenie poddano sposoby zarządzania nimi, aktywność oraz popularyzację. Całość została poddana analizie SWOT.

EN

Landscape diversity also means a diversity and multitude of forms of conserving its structure and beauty. This conservation has lasted for over 150 years around the world and for over 100 years in Poland. For around twenty years, it has concentrated around the cultural landscape and its form of statutory protection: the cultural park. After it became possible to establish such parks, voivodeship strategies were amended to list over 200 areas. At present, this number is around forty. The process is dynamic, as the liquidation of a park was observed already in 2021, and several resolutions on the establishment of one were recorded. In this paper, the authors, following their comprehensive expert report drafted at the National Heritage Institute, analyze existing cultural parks, the goals of their establishment, the content of resolutions that had established them, conservation plan provisions and the practice of their operation. Their management, activity and popularization were assessed. The findings were then subjected to a SWOT analysis.

2

Nuclear weapons in the strategies of the United States and NATO. Strategy of massive retaliation and flexible response

Zielonka Z.

Zeszyty Naukowe / Wyższa Szkoła Oficerska Wojsk Lądowych im. gen. T. Kościuszki

|

2016

|

Nr 3

71--99

EN

The introduction of the hydrogen bomb to the nuclear arsenal turned out to be a breakthrough in the creation of the strategic deterrence system. It determined the evolution of the nuclear strategy on both sides of the “Iron Curtain”. The appearance of high-power light thermonuclear bombs became an impulse for the creation of ballistic missiles. Globally, this type of weapon significantly speeded up reaching a nuclear stalemate and contributed to taking up efforts to seek measures of a limited nuclear war and a “flexible response” as an alternative to massive retaliation.

3

Nuclear weapon in the strategies of the United States and NATO. The containment strategy

Zielonka Z.

Zeszyty Naukowe / Wyższa Szkoła Oficerska Wojsk Lądowych im. gen. T. Kościuszki

|

2016

|

Nr 2

177--193

EN

The fact that the production and the use of a nuclear weapon during the World War II began a new chapter in both the development of military technology and views on the preparation and conduct of a war. Creators and supporters of the atomic bomb quickly realized that it was too powerful to force it into the framework of existing doctrines. Therefore, it proved necessary to look for other solutions as the basis for a new type of a strategy. It was expected that this would be the political-military "containment" strategy introduced in the late 1940s. This, becoming the cornerstone of the US foreign policy, treated the nuclear arsenal as the most convenient and sometimes the only tool of deterrence of the Soviet Union. In the military dimension, as a derivative of the contradictory nuclear strategy of the Truman’s administration, it did not give up the bombing of cities but through deterrence and assurance of the security of allies in Europe it proposed a quick and massive nuclear attack.