Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 3

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  dochodzenie
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available Europejski nakaz dochodzeniowy : zagadnienia wybrane
PL
Artykuł porusza tematykę europejskiego nakazu dochodzeniowego. Jest to instytucja wdrożona do polskiego kodeksu postępowania karnego w 2018 r. i ma ona na celu zdynamizowanie prowadzenia postępowań w ujęciu transgranicznym. Z uwagi na fakt, iż jest to bardzo obszerna problematyka, autor wybrał trzy zagadnienia mające niebagatelne znaczenie w praktyce. Analizie poddane zostały kwestie organu wydającego END, sposobu komunikacji pomiędzy organami oraz terminów związanych z wykonaniem END. W rozważaniach uwzględniono aktualne piśmiennictwo oraz orzecznictwo. Autor w każdym z badanych aspektów sformułował wnioski. W przeważającej części odnoszą się one do zagadnienia formalizmu procesowego i zakładają elektronizację postępowań. Zgłaszane postulaty elektronizacji mają na celu usprawnienie i przyspieszenie procedury związanej z END i bez wątpienia będą mogły być wykorzystane także w przypadku innych czynności karnoprocesowych, nie tylko odnoszących się do międzynarodowej współpracy w sprawach karnych.
EN
The article deals with the subject of the European Investigation Order. It is an institution implemented in the Polish Code of Criminal Procedure in 2018 and its purpose is to accelerate the conduct of cross-border proceedings. Due to the fact that this is a very extensive issue, the author chose three issues of considerable importance in practice. The issues of the authority issuing the END, the method of communication between the authorities and the deadlines related to the execution of the END were analyzed. The considerations take into account the current literature and jurisprudence. The author formulated conclusions in each of the examined aspects. For the most part, they relate to the issue of procedural formalism and assume the electronicisation of proceedings. The reported postulates of digitization are intended to streamline and accelerate the procedure related to the END and will undoubtedly be used also in the case of other criminal-procedural activities, not only those relating to international cooperation in criminal matters.
2
Content available remote Crime scene reconstruction with RGB-D sensors
EN
Photographic surveying, a fundamental procedure in crime investigation, is typically performed using 2D cameras. Although useful, such cameras remain limited due to the lack of depth information. In this work, we propose a 3D reconstruction solution that leverages the advantages of cheap RGB-D sensors to create a 3D model of the crime scene and to provide the investigator with an interactive crime scenario simulation environment. A structure from motion approach is proposed in order to align the captured point clouds on each other using 3D key points. An iterative refinement and a global optimization algorithm are later adapted for the optimization of the registered 3D model, which is then triangulated before the underlying surface is reconstructed. The resulting model is used for interactive crime investigation and object dynamics simulation. The obtained results show the effectiveness of our solution with a visually appealing rendering, an accurate simulation and a quantitative error of less than 18cm for the $4m \times 4 m$ indoor scene. An accompanying video is provided in order to illustrate the processing pipeline (https://youtu.be/IYnJSNV7QkI).
EN
The sole purpose of air accident investigations should be the prevention of accidents and incidents in the future without apportioning blame or liability. Any civil aviation safety system is based on feedback and lessons learned from accidents and incidents, which require the strict application of rules on confidentiality in order to ensure the availability of valuable sources of information in the future. Therefore, related data, especially sensitive safety information, should be protected in an appropriate manner. Information provided by a person in the framework of a safety investigation should not be used against that person, in full respect of constitutional principles, as well as national and international law. Each “involved person” in an accident or another serious incident should promptly notify the competent investigating authority of the state of the event. An “involved person” means the owner, a member of the crew, the operator of the aircraft involved in an accident or other serious incident, or any person involved in the maintenance, design, manufacture of the affected aircraft or in the training of its crews, as well as any person involved in air traffic control, providing flight information or providing airport services to the aircraft in question, the staff of the national civil aviation authority, or staff of the European Aviation Safety Agency. The protection level of the organization (employer): employees who report an event or replace applications following an event with regard to the appropriate reporting systems should not face any prejudice from their employer because of information provided by the applicant. The protection does not cover (exclusions): infringement with wilful misconduct (direct intent, recklessness infringement); infringement committed by a clear and serious disregard of the obvious risks; and serious professional negligence of an unquestionably duty of care required under the circumstances, resulting in possible or actual damage to persons or property, or damage that seriously compromises the level of aviation safety. All employees in the aviation sector, regardless of their function, have safety-related duties, which are crucial to the security of the entire civil aviation system. The safety of this system requires that as many events that have or may have an impact on security in aviation are reported voluntarily and without delay in order to conduct appropriate analyses and increase the level of safety. “Just Culture” is the basic premise of the effective functioning of event reporting required for all aviation organizations in order to maintain and enhance safety levels. As safety management is based on data, it is necessary to introduce appropriate procedures, which allow for obtaining information, not only about the events that have already occurred, but also about any other events that could potentially cause hazardous conditions. All the procedures and rules of operation relating to the policy of “Just Culture” should be constructed, so that they not only comply with the provisions of applicable law, but are also rational and understandable among all stakeholders, while ensuring a certain level of comfort and confidentiality to those reporting events that affect airline safety. Changes in the existing legal system should be established in cooperation with all concerned institutions: law enforcement, including the courts and public prosecution bodies, insurers aviation, the aircraft accident investigation commission and other entities. Is it possible to reconcile the interests of so-called “Just Culture” in the aviation industry with the requirements of the above-mentioned institutions and traders involved in the implementation of air transport and the exploration of the effects of aerial surveys? The answers to this and similar questions will be fully addressed in this article.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.