Wyniki wyszukiwania - BazTech

Ograniczanie wyników

1 Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering

1 2018

Powiadomienia systemowe

Sesja wygasła!

Znaleziono wyników: 1

Liczba wyników na stronie

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych: bagging algorithm

Sortuj według:

Ogranicz wyniki do:

Extraction of fuzzy rules at different concept levels related to image features of mammography for diagnosis of breast cancer

Goudarzi M., Maghooli K.

Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering

2018

Vol. 38, no. 4

1004--1014

Mammography is an inexpensive and non-invasive method through which one can diagnose breast cancer in its early stages. As these images need interpretation by a radiologist, this may develop some problems due to fatigue, repetition, and need for a great deal of attention to details and other factors. Thus, a method capable of diagnosing breast cancer should be employed to help physicians in this regard. In this paper, The mini Mammographic Image Analysis Society (mini-MIAS) database of mammograms is used. The aim is to distinguish between normal and abnormal classes. In the preprocessing stage, noise removal, removal of labels of images, heightening the contrast, and ROI segmentation are performed, and then compactness, entropy, mean, and smoothness are extracted from the images. In addition to classification, we have come to a new approach in order to create a complete knowledge base, which then we use this knowledge base for classification. We have a comprehensive knowledge base which covers all the conceptual levels. The extracted features are referred to as fuzzy classifiers through the look-up table method. And, for evaluation of the results, the 10-fold method is used. Discretization operations are performed on training data across 2, 3, and 4 levels to develop concept hierarchy. Concept hierarchies reduce the data by replacing low-level concepts with higher-level concepts and the outcome is more meaningful and easier to interpret. Eventually, Bagging algorithm is used for finding out the majority vote and the final result of the discretization levels. The obtained accuracy is 89.37 ± 6.62.