Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 7

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  NSDI
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
EN
. The purpose of the article is to present the research on method of the quality evaluation of published open geospatial data and its implementation in Ukraine. The method of the quality evaluation of open geospatial data considers the international standard ISO 19157 “Geographic information. Data quality”. This method is to determine the number of points or levels (maximum – 5). The research was carried out for the evaluation of open geoinformation resources for production of geospatial datasets, as defined in the Ukrainian Law on NSDI. The authors evaluated the quality of 142 open geoinformation resources and other information resources (materials) for the production and updating of 34 geospatial datasets for the development of NSDI in Ukraine. The authors present the example of the quality evaluation of geospatial data for datasets: “State Geodetic Reference Coordinate System UCS-2000”, “State Geodetic Network”, “Geographical Names” and “Administrative Units” because they are the components of the Core Reference Dataset of NSDI. Limitations of the research were determined by the adopted the Law of Ukraine “On National Spatial Data Infrastructure” and the Order for NSDI functioning in Ukraine and the requirements of the international standard ISO 19157 “Geographic information. Data quality”. The results of the research will be employed to evaluate the quality of NSDI implementation in Ukraine. The proposed method allows evaluating the quality of open geospatial dataset before using them for analysis and modeling of terrain, phenomena. This method takes into account the quality of geospatial data, and its related requirements for their production, updating and publication.
EN
According to the survey of May of 2008, advanced works on NSDI are carried out in 26 countries of Europe. The introduction of INSPIRE Directive 2007/2/WE has resulted in stimulation of legislative processes concerning its implementation (especially noticeable i.e. in Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Norway, Sweden, Italy and Poland), as well as of legislative processes concerning the NSDI (i.e. Swiss FSDI, Polish KIDP, Czech NGII, French IFDG, Irish ISDI, Slovak NIPI and Hungarian NTI). In May 2008, still 18 countries of EU and EEA (Austria, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Cyprus, Denmark, France, Greece, Netherlands, Ireland, Island, Luxemburg, Latvia, Malta, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Hungary and Great Britain) hadn't its own NSDI legislation. In 13 countries (Austria, Czech Republic, Cyprus, France, Greece, Ireland, Island, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Switzerland, Hungary, Great Britain - precisely Scotland and Northern Ireland) such acts were in the course of preparation and/or legislative process. The survey and analysis of NSDI acts and its drafts allowed the author to propose the typology of NSDI using criteria of the system (9 types), the level of coordination (6 types), the thematic scope (4 types), the competences of organizative bodies (5 types). It was also possible to propose the typology of legislative and organizational solutions applied in the countries, which haven't its own NSDI laws. The survey allowed carrying out the synthesis concerning the NDSI standards, metadata and NSDI portals. The author analysed also the NSDI legislative and organizational solutions concerning data multiple utilization and data status. The analysis revealed big diversity of NSDI legislative and organizational solutions. However, it is worth to mention that big part of EU and EEA has adopted the NSDI system with constitutive role of the spatial data councils and executive role of the surveying institutions. The analysis has proved that the level of NSDI coordination can influence, but not determine the efficiency of the NSDI. The practice of a group of EU countries shows usefulness of incorporating the system solutions concerning the data multiple utilization and regular data assessment into the NSDI legislation.
EN
Assuring coordination among entities providing spatial information for the needs of the policy of the European Community in the area of environment protection by creating metadata for spatial data collections and services is the basic assumption of the INSPIRE Directive establishing Spatial Information Infrastructure in the European Community based of infrastructures of member states. The construction and exploration of the technical part of SDI should be based on ISO and CEN standards and OGC and W3C technical specifications in order to obtain interoperability required by the Directive. Spatial Information Infrastructure (SDI) should contain three elementary functions: publication of metadata for spatial data collections and services according to the application profile ISO 19115/19119 and the national profile by means of interoperative metadata catalogues, search of published spatial data services, authorized access to spatial data services irrespective of the application environment of the user by means of both web and desktop applications. A possibility of adaptation of spatial information systems (GIS) functioning so far to their working together in internet or intranet is very important from the point of view of cost of implementation of the SDI. The implementation of such a solution makes it possible to apply appropriate service oriented architecture (SOA), and in particular web services, where the conformity of interfaces of services with OGC and W3C technical specifications is a condition of effective integration and working together of already existing systems. An additional benefit resulting from the ifrastructure based on SOA is the possibility of integrating web services created on independent technological platforms. This makes it possible to use both free and open and commercial software, which may have an effective impact on the cost of construction of the infrastructure. The experience of the EU countries shows that economic benefits result first of all from integration of free and open software with legally restricted software. The use of public license does not have to be an alternative for the software legally restricted by its manufacturer, but a substitute having influence on efficiency and functionality of Spatial Data Infrastructure.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.