Wyniki wyszukiwania - BazTech

1

The significance and stylistic features of eclectic objects in the city of Kharkov

Davidich Tatiana F.

Technical Transactions

|

2019

|

Vol. 116, iss. 4

5--21

EN

The article analyses the time periodisation of various eclectic currents in the architecture of Kharkov and the stylistic features of each flow. It shows how external factors (the administrative status of the city, political influences, trends in religious life, economic development) and various currents of eclecticism have influenced the transformation of the urban environment and characterised the specific features of the objects and the work of outstanding architects. On the basis of the analysis, architectural periods of eclectic currents in Kharkov have been identified and a list of them has been compiled.

PL

Artykuł analizuje periodyzację różnych prądów eklektycznych w architekturze Charkowa i cechy stylistyczne każdego przepływu. Pokazuje, jak czynniki zewnętrzne (status administracyjny miasta, wpływy polityczne, trendy w życiu religijnym, rozwój gospodarczy) i różne nurty eklektyzmu wpłynęły na transformację środowiska miejskiego i scharakteryzowały specyficzne cechy dzieł wybitnych architektów. Na podstawie analizy okresów architektonicznych eklektyczne prądy w Charkowie zostały zidentyfikowane i opracowano ich listę.

2

Visual symbols of new identity in cities of modern Ukraine during the interwar period

Linda S., Mykhaylyshyn O.

Budownictwo i Architektura

|

2017

|

Vol. 16, nr 3

63--76

EN

In the interwar period western and eastern parts of the modern-day Ukraine were included into two countries – the Second Polish Republic and the Soviet Union. The development of cities of modern-day Ukraine during 1920-30th took place according to various ideological and cultural models. Changes in “cultural models” and ideological guidelines, as well as the departure from forms of traditional society during that period can be viewed as associated but semantically inconsistent targets; those carried out in each region in different sociopolitical conditions and with different directions of socio-cultural transformations; those that can be seen most clearly in the spatial planning of the cities. Approaches to the planning of Western Ukrainian cities, based on the synthesis of historically formed traditional environment, identified urban environment as European integral element of globalization process and were interpreted as an idea, alternative to socialistic internationalism that was consistently implemented in the Soviet Ukraine at that time. The process of formation of national and collective identity was visualized by “blending” and modernization of architectural environment layers, entry or expulsion of architectural sites of different ages, which symbolized the socio-cultural changes, both were part of the interaction of social and cultural systems.

3

Features of architecture of ukraine in 1920-30's on examples of Kyiv and Kharkiv

Abyzov V., Markovskyi A.

Środowisko Mieszkaniowe

|

2015

|

nr 14

94--105

EN

Basic features and tendencies, inherent to the transition from a Constructivism style to Stalin Neoclassicism style (to Empire style) in architecture of Ukraine on the example of her the two capitals – Kharkiv (1919–1934) and Kyiv (since 1934) outlined in the article. It is reviewed originality and exceptional nature of evolution of architecture and spatial composition of prominent urban objects of these places in the World and Soviet architectural and artistic context of the Interwar Years. Particular attention paid to the competitive projects on development of governmental capital areas of Kharkiv and Kyiv.

4

W hołdzie ofiarom

Kazik A., Kolanowski B., Wiśniowski J.

Geodeta : magazyn geoinformacyjny

|

2010

|

nr 5

6-11

5

Kharkov as a Capital of Soviet-Ukrainian Constructivism

Rychkov P.

Teka Komisji Architektury, Urbanistyki i Studiów Krajobrazowych

|

2008

|

T. 4, cz. A

116--133

EN

Today it is clear us, that Soviet Constructivism should be considered not only as an essential fusion of architecture and Bolshevik’s policy, whose leaders at- tempted to balance the “hunger situation” with “a good new regime”. In the world-wide context it should be also considered as an interesting site for hard fundamental debates on relationship between tradition and innovation, between historicism and modernism. In the last sense, the origin and death of Kharkov Constructivism demonstrate itself as an outstanding phenomenon not only in Ukrainian architectural heritage but also in the world context. The failure of Soviet Constructivism at the begin 1930-ies means also, that the modern archi tectural paradigm in the USSR has fallen under the powerful extra-professional influences. But the posterior failure of Stalin’s monumentality as a regressive “wedding-cake style” proved in the middle of 1950-ies, that there are no impene trable and eternal borders in the architectural evolution.