Wyniki wyszukiwania - BazTech

Ograniczanie wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 2

Liczba wyników na stronie

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych: Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process

Sortuj według:

Ogranicz wyniki do:

Identifying the source of the problem by using implemented the FAHP method in the selected quality management techniques

Siwiec Dominika, Pacana Andrzej

Production Engineering Archives

2020

Vol. 26, Iss. 1

5--10

Making a complex analysis of the problem in order to identify the root of its occurrence, is the process burdened with the risk of uncertainty. This risk is in case of the quality analysis, in which the choice and making a decision is not confirmed by reliable information (number). This risk is in case of the quality analysis, in which the choice and making a decision is not confirmed by reliable information (number). But these techniques do not include the risk of uncertainty, so their sequence should be expanded about the appropriate method, to take this into account. It was considered beneficial to demonstrate that this method is the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process method (FAHP). The aim of the study to implement the FAHP method in the sequence of traditional quality management techniques (Ishikawa diagram and 5Why method) and proposition new, not practiced yet the method to complex analysis of the problem and identify the root of its root cause. The subject of the study was the furniture front, on which the incompatibility was identified (shortened foil). From the categories to which the potential causes of the inadequate foil were assigned, by using the Ishikawa diagram and the FAHP method in an integrated manner, were defined the most important categories (method and machine) in a precise (numerical) way. Next, using the same tools, the relationship between the potential causes was analysed and selected the main causes of the problem. Then, by using the 5Why method the root of the problem was defined (lack of the new machine and failure to comply with labor standards). The obtained results could differ depending on the subjectivity, however, the method itself proved to be effective and can be used to solve other types of the problem.

Multi-criteria investment decision support model using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP) method for power industry

Stoltmann A., Bućko P., Jaskólski M.

Zeszyty Naukowe Wydziału Elektrotechniki i Automatyki Politechniki Gdańskiej

2015

Nr 47

179--182

In this paper, the comparative analysis of two wind farm construction projects was presented. This particular type of analysis is commonly applied before purchasing investment project being in a planning phase by a company interested in its development. Conduction of this type of analysis is prompted by the necessity to take into consideration the requirements of Polish legislation. Comparison of wind farm construction projects was based on the analysis of their advancement and the priority of particular investment stages. In order to verify which stage is the most important for the implementation of the construction project, specified tasks should be performed in each particular stage. These tasks determine criteria utilized to compare wind farm construction projects. Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (F-AHP) method, that allows simultaneous prioritization of criteria in terms of quality and quantity, was applied to perform the analysis. The method demonstrates that obtaining environmental decision for wind farm area is the most important criterion. The method indicate also by which criteria project FW2 has a greater chance of implementation than FW1 project.

Referat przedstawia porównanie projektów dwóch farm wiatrowych. Tego typu analiza znajduje zastosowanie w przypadku zakupu projektów inwestycyjnych będących w fazie przygotowania. Spowodowane jest to koniecznością uwzględnienia wymogów określonych w ustawodawstwie polskim. Porównanie projektów budowy farm wiatrowych oparto na analizie zaawansowania oraz priorytetu poszczególnych etapów inwestycji. Aby zweryfikować, na jaki etap należy zwrócić szczególną uwagę posłużono się analizą zagadnień opisujących poszczególne etapy oraz zadań w nich realizowanych. Zagadnienia te definiują kryteria wpływające na realizację projektu. Analizę przeprowadzono z wykorzystaniem metody F-AHP, która pozwala na ilościowe i jakościowe uporządkowanie kryteriów. Analiza wykazała, że priorytetowym kryterium jest uzyskanie decyzji o uwarunkowaniach środowiskowych dla obszaru farmy wiatrowej oraz to, że projekt FW2 maj większe szanse na realizację niż projekt FW1.