Wyniki wyszukiwania - BazTech

Ograniczanie wyników

1 Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering

1 2025

Powiadomienia systemowe

Sesja wygasła!
Sesja wygasła!

Znaleziono wyników: 1

Liczba wyników na stronie

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych: DW2 ionization chamber

Sortuj według:

Ogranicz wyniki do:

Enhancing Dosimetry Accuracy: Characterization and Verification of an Experimental Cylindrical Graphite Ionization Chamber for Dosimetry of Therapeutic Photon Beams in Reference Conditions

Wołowiec Paweł, Niedziałek Weronika, Szymko Magdalena, Tulik Piotr, Zaczek Krzysztof, Stemplowska Joanna, Buliński Krzysztof, Braziewicz Janusz

Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering

2025

Vol. 31, Iss. 2

158--163

Introduction: Three cylindrical graphite ionization chambers have been constructed, one of which, DW3, participated in the BIPM.RI(I)-K4 key comparisons for absorbed dose to water in a gamma radiation field of the 60Co radionuclide, achieving a positive result. This prompted us to attempt to use the experimental DW2 chamber (twin to DW3 chamber) for dosimetry of high-energy photon beams used clinically with the aim of reducing the value of the total standard uncertainty of the measured radiation dose. Material and methods: The performance of the DW2 chamber was first tested in gamma ray fields of 137Cs and 60Co. Subsequently, the chamber was calibrated in a 60Co beam relative to the GUM primary standard (DW3). Then, the kQ factors for 6, 10, and 15 MV photon beams produced by Versa HD, Elekta accelerators were determined using Monte Carlo methods. Next, for the same beams, the correction factors for saturation (ks) and the polarity (kpol) were experimentally determined. Finally, the DW2 chamber was used to measure the absorbed dose to water under reference conditions. The obtained results were compared to those of a commercial Farmer-type ionization chamber, model 30013 by PTW. A metrological conformity test was used for evaluation. Results: The relative differences between the two chambers (DW2 vs Farmer chamber) in measured absorbed dose to water for 6, 10, and 15 MV photon beams were −0.1 %, 0.2 %, and 0.7 %, respectively. The relative standard uncertainties of the dose measurement under reference conditions using the DW2 chamber were approximately 0.6 % which are lower than those for the commercial chamber (Farmer) of 0.89 %. Conclusions: The obtained results confirm that the DW2 ionization chamber is an accurate tool for measuring absorbed dose to water under reference conditions for therapeutic photon beams. Lower measurement uncertainty will translate into higher precision in monitoring and calibration of the accelerator’s output.