Wyniki wyszukiwania - BazTech

Ograniczanie wyników

1 Silniki Spalinowe

1 2007

Powiadomienia systemowe

Sesja wygasła!

Znaleziono wyników: 1

Liczba wyników na stronie

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych: (nano) particulates

Sortuj według:

Ogranicz wyniki do:

Influences of Alternative Fuels GTL, RME and ROR on Combustion and Emissions of a Modern HD-Diesel Engine

Czerwinski J., Zimmerli Y., Neubert T., Heitzer A., Kasper M.

Silniki Spalinowe

2007

R. 46, nr SC3

180-200

Due to the limited energy resources as well as due to increasing CD2-emissions the importance of alterative- and biogene fuels is continuously increasing. Investigations of the engine operation were performed on a latest technology Liebherr engine for construction machines. It was operated using crude rapseed oil (RDR)'), rapeseed oil methyl ester (RME), synthetic Gas-To-Liquid fuel (GTL) and diesel (as reference fuel). The combustion diagnostics, the performance of the injection system as well as the pollutant emissions, including unlimited nanoparticles were assessed. The most important findings ean be summarized as joilows : Fuel injection - Both, RME and RDR shortened the injection delay which was due to a quicker increase of injection pressure and a faster needle lift, - the highest maximum injection pressure was observed with RDR (1610 bar), followed by RME (1580 bar), Diesel (1450 bar) and GTL (1410 bar), - As compared to diesel, GTL exhibited no significant differences of hydraulic behavior. Combustion - Usually, GTL caused a shorter ignition delay, but it burned slower, so that 50% of heat release took place at the same CA-position, as for Diesel. in addition, GTL provoked a lower rate of pressure raise and reduced the maximum combustion pressure. These effects were particularly pronounces at lower and medium loads. - At higher engine load RDR and RME started to bum earlier and at a higher rate, than Diesel and GTL. Therefore, 50% of the heat release followed with ROR and RME 1-2 CA earlier which had consequences for the NOx emissions. Limited emissions and energy consumption GTL lowered generally ail emission components - as compared to standard Diesel fuel. In addition, the energy consumption with GTL was equal or slightly lower. RME lowered CO and HC emissions and increased NOx emissions at ail operating points. It lowered PM at higher engine loads and increased PM at lower engine loads. RME had no effect on specific energy consumption. ROR lowered CO, HC and PM at ail operating points by at least 50% or more. In the high-load-operation RDR reduced the specific energy consumption (approx. 2%) and increased NOx (up to approx.5%). At low-load-operating points (1500 rpm/10%) ROR did not affect CO and NOx, but increased PM emissions and energy consumption. Nanoparticle emissions - GTL and diesel nanoparticle emissions were identical, - Both RME and RDR moved the PSD spectra to smaller sizes and increased the nuclei mode due to spontaneous condensate formation, - Both RME and RDR caused lower particle emissions at high load and higher emissions at low load, The use of ROR resulted in a particularly high portion of condensates (SDF) at low load and idling.