It is possible to monitor effects related to flow in a jet aircraft engine by the three basic approaches - analytical, numerical and experimental Each approach has undergone changes and has been developed to the stage of its effective use. To efficiently manage the scientific and research work it is appropriate to use effective links among all three basic approaches. An experimental approach requires a test stand on which the characteristics of a usually geometrically reduced object or the actual object itself are verified. The principles of geometric and hydrodynamic similarities are applied. This approach is time and economically demanding and not all aerodynamic processes can be reliably simulated. Other disaavantages can be the occurrence of measurement errors, errors due to changes in the scale, influences of chemical reactions and influence of Reynolds number. Due to a very fast onset, development and challenges of IT, the numerical approach has become mostly used. It can provide sufficient information on an examined phenomenon in a particular object. It does not need any substantial simpliflcations, it is less financially demanding than the experimental approach, but it needs efficient processors with a huge memory capacity. Its disadvantage is a relatively large dependence of achieved results accuracy on the perfection of numerical models and models of turbulence in the areas with prevailing influence ofviscosity. The usage ofanalytical relations from mathematical andphysical analysis of the flow fleld is the fundamental of the analytical approach of observing the laws related to flowing. The paper deals with possibilities, procedures, advantages, and disadvantages of the mentioned approaches together with a presentation of some results from research and development activities carried out by the authors.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.