Rozmycia przy mostach i ich monitorowanie. Cz. 2

• Autorzy: Jarominiak A.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Bridge scour and its monitoring. Part 2

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

Najczęstszą przyczyną awarii lub katastrof mostów są rozmycia przy ich podporach. Stąd celowość monitorowania przy nich stanu koryt cieków. W pierwszej części artykułu są przedstawione przenośne systemy monitoringu: sondy manualne, sonary i instrumenty geofizyczne. W drugiej części artykułu przedstawiono stałe systemy: obniżający się pierścień, czujniki uruchamiane przez erozję i reflektometry.

EN

The most common cause of bridge failure or disaster is scour at their supports. Hence the requirement to monitor the condition of channel beds around them. The following portable monitoring systems are presented in the first part of the article: manual probes, sonars and geophysical instruments. The second part of the article discusses fixed systems: dropping ring, erosion-triggered sensors and reflectometers.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

rozmycia koryta cieku; instrumenty monitoringu rozmyć

EN

channel scour; instruments for scour monitoring

• Wydawca: Stowarzyszenie Inżynierów i Techników Komunikacji Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej
• Czasopismo: Drogownictwo
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: nr 1
• Strony: 3--11
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 15 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Jarominiak A.

Bibliografia

• [1] F. Ansari, Simple Cost-Effective Scour Sensor. Research Report. Illinois Center for Transportation, Illinois, 2010
• [2] Y. Dong, R. Song, H. Liu, Bridge Structural Health Monitoring and Deterioration Detection – Synthesis of Knowledge and Technology. Final Report. Fairbanks, 2010
• [3] K. Garret, Solve sensing challenges with optical sensor. Electrical Design News, Nov. 2012
• [4] B.C. Gerwick Jr.: Construction of Marine and Offshore Structures. Third Edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2007
• [5] A. Jarominiak, A. Rosset, Katastrofy i awarie mostów, WKŁ, Warszawa 1986
• [6] D.E. Kosnik, Internet-Enabled Remote Monitoring of Civil Infrastructure with TDR. Purdue University, West Lafayette, 2006
• [7] B.W. Melville, S.E. Coleman: Bridge Scour. Water Resources Publications, LLC, Highlands Ranch, US, 2000
• [8] D.S. Mueller, M.N. Landers, Portable Instrumentation for Real-Time Measurement of Scour Bridge. FHWA-RD-99-085. George Pike McLean. 1999
• [9] H. Nassif, A.O. Ertekin, J. Davis, Evaluation of Bridge Scour Monitoring Methods. FHWA-NJ-2003-009, 2002
• [10] J.D. Schall, G.R. Price, Portable Scour Monitoring Equipment. NCHRP Report 515. Transport Research Board of the National Academies, 2004
• [11] Bridge Scour and Stream Instability Countermeasures Experience, Selection and Design Guidance. Third Edition. FHWA – NHI – 09-111. HEC 23, 2009
• [12] Monitoring Scour Critical Bridges. NCHRP Synthesis 396. Transportation Research Board of National Academies. N.York, 2009
• [13] NCHRP Synthesis 396. Monitoring Scour Critical Bridges. Transportation Research Board of National Academies. N. York, 2009
• [14] Compendium of Papers ASCE Water Resources Engineering Conference 1991–1998. Reston 1998:
• a. R. Ettema, B.W. Melville, B. Barkdoll: Pier Width and Local-Scour Depth. Stream Stability and Scour at Highway Bridges. Compendium of Papers ASCE Water Resources Engineering Conferences 1991-1998. Edited by E.V. Richardson and P.F. Lagasse. ASCE, Fort Collins,1998.
• b. P.F. Lagasse, E.V. Richardson, J.D. Schall, J.R. Richardson, G.R. Price: Fixed Instrumentation for Monitoring Scour at Bridges. Stream Stability and Scour at Highway Bridges.
• c. D.S. Mueller, M.N. Landers: Detailed Field Measurement of Scour Processes During Floods.
• d. A.C. Parola, D.J. Hagerty, D.S. Mueller, B.W. Melville, G. Parker, J.S. Usher: The Need for Research on Scour at Bridge Crossings. Stream Stability and Scour at Highway Bridges.
• e. G. Placzek, F.P. Heani, R. Trent: Using Geophysical Data to Assess Scour Development.
• [15] US Patent 6526189. Scour sensor assembly 06/13/2001