Formation of management and technological maturity levels of enterprises for their dynamic development

• Autorzy: Shpak Nestor , Vytvytska Olga , Martynyuk Olga , Sroka Włodzimierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/emj-2022-0022

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Currently, the market environment contains many factors influencing the enterprise’s competitiveness. Instability, the unpredictability of events, and insufficiently effective functioning of market mechanisms alter the management focus and processes engaged in an enterprise’s functioning. Some of them are intensive in terms of required resources and finance. Such a dynamic situation requires the enterprise management to build innovative solutions to flexibly respond and timely adapt to change. Therefore, this study aims to develop theoretical and applied approaches to determining the level of managerial and technological maturity of the basic set of technologies implemented in enterprises. In the context of this issue’s development and aiming to achieve the purpose, the study proposed a model approach where the introduction of individual technologies allows combining the rules for determining the enterprise’s management and the technological maturity level, i.e., its readiness for such changes. The construction of the model was based on the analysis and calculation of statistical data from four groups of technologies (corporate, industrial, decision support, and information technologies, which are divided into subclasses) and based on the theory of dynamic innovation development. The results were tested at seven food industry enterprises in Ukraine. Based on the study, the actual level of managerial and technological maturity of enterprises was determined, creating one complex set of technologies that depend on the level and structural changes in management and the level of technological maturity of enterprises. It can be used as a typical model for differently sized enterprises representing various industries.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

innovation dynamics; technological maturity; food enterprises; development management; resources

PL

dynamika innowacji; dojrzałość technologiczna; przedsiębiorstwa spożywcze; zarządzanie rozwojem; zasoby

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Białostockiej
• Czasopismo: Engineering Management in Production and Services
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 14, no. 3
• Strony: 1--12
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 56 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Shpak Nestor

• Lviv Polytechnic National University, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0620-2458

autor

Vytvytska Olga

• Lviv Polytechnic National University, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2510-3562

autor

Martynyuk Olga

• International Humanitarian University, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0377-7881

autor

Sroka Włodzimierz

• WSB University, Poland
• University of Johannesburg, South Africa

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8701-0716+

Bibliografia

• Bohashko, O. L. (2013). Evolution of Theoretical Approaches to Innovation Development in Economic Science. Bulletin of the Berdyansk University of Management and Business, 2(22), 23-29.
• Bushuyev, S. D., Bushuyeva, N. S., Babayev, I. A., Yakovenko, V. B., & Grisha Ye. B. (2010). Creative technologies of project and program management. Ukrainian Project Management Association. Kyiv: SammitKniga.
• Cieslinska, K. (2007). The Basic Roles of Manager in Business Organization. Roczniki Akademii Rolniczej w Poznaniu, CCCLXXXV, Ekon, 6, 3-12. Retrieved from http://www.jard.edu.pl/pub/1_6_2007.pdf
• Ciocanel, A. B., & Pavalescu, F. M. (2015). Innovation and Competitiveness in European Context. Procedia Economics and Finance, 32, 728-737. doi: 10.1016/ S2212-5671(15)01455-0
• Didyk, A. M. (2016). Innovative dynamics as an element of the system of poluvector development of enterprises. Economy. Finances. Law, 5, 4-6.
• Florek-Paszkowska, A., Ujwary-Gil, A., & Godlewska- -Dzioboń, B. (2021). Business innovation and critical success factors in the era of digital transformation and turbulent times. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management, and Innovation, 17(4), 7-28. doi: 10.7341/20211741
• Gloet, M., & Samson, D. (2020). Knowledge management and systematic innovation capability. In Disruptive Technology: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1198-1218). IGI Global.
• Grim, T. (2009). Foresight Maturity Model (FMM): Achieving Best Practices in the Foresight Field. Journal of Futures Studies, 13(4), 69-80.
• Hagen, B., Denicolai, S., & Zucchella, A. (2014). International entrepreneurship at the crossroads between innovation and internationalization. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 12(2), 111-114.
• Hilkevics, S., & Hilkevica, G. (2017). New information technologies use for Latvian stock companies financial health. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, 5(2), 178-189. doi: ff10.9770/jesi.2017.5.2(1)
• Honcharenko, O. M. (2012). Analysis of synergetic phenomena of the economic system and their role in the stability of its development. Bulletin of the Vinnytsia National Polytechnic University, 6(105), 83-87.
• Hutsalyuk, O. M. (2012). Methodological Approach to the Estimation of Enterprise Technology Mature. Business Information, 11, 200-204.
• Jain, S., & Lechevalier, D. (2016). Standards based generation of a virtual factory model. In P. I. Frazier, R. Szechtman, E. Zhou, T. Huschka, & S. E. Chick (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC ‘16) (pp. 2762-2773). Piscataway: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/WSC.2016.7822313
• Jurczak, J., & Jurczak, G. (2021). Application of factor analysis in company management — selected examples related to competitiveness and market success. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 13(3), 25-36. doi: 10.2478/emj2021-0019
• Katou, A. A. (2021). COVID-19 and organisational performance: a quasi-longitudinal and multilevel study of Greece. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 9(4), 117-135. doi: 10.23762/FSO_VOL9_NO4_6
• Kaźmierska-Jóźwiak, B., Sekuła, P., & Socha, B. (2021). Analysis of the effects of COVID-19 on companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 9(4), 99-116. doi: 10.23762//FSO_VOL9_NO4_5
• Kalyuzhna, N. H. (2011). Self-organization and development of the socio-economic system: synergistic approach. Problems and prospects of market-oriented management of innovation development. Sumy: Printing House Papyrus Ltd.
• Khaken, G. (2003). Secrets of Nature. Synergetics: the science of interaction (translated from German). Moscow Izhevsk: In-t computer. Research.
• Kerzner, H. (2007). Strategic Planning for Project Management Using a Project Management Maturity Model. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
• Kondratiev, N. D. (2002). Long Cycles of Economic Conjuncture and the Theory of Foresight. Moscow: Ekonomika. Kononiuk, A. (2022). Determinants of Foresight Maturity in SME Enterprises of Poland. Foresight and STI Governance, 16(1), 69-81.
• Lee, R., Lee, J. H., & Garrett, T. C. (2019). Synergy effects of innovation on firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 99, 507-515. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.032
• Mandra, A. V. (2012). Models of technological maturity for assessing the functioning of the information resource of a shipbuilding enterprise. East European Journal of Advanced Technologies, 1/13(55), 61-63.
• Martunyuk, О., Vitvitskaya, О., Lagodiienko, V., & Krupitsa, I. (2019). Formation of an innovative concept of management on the basis of reconstruction of genetic algorithm of management technology. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 7(2), 487-499. doi: 10.21533/pen.v7i2
• Miller, R., Weir, C., & Gulati, S. (2018). Transforming primary care: scoping review of research and practice. Journal of Integrated Care, 26(3), 176-188. doi: 10.1108/JICA-03-2018-0023
• Mintzberg, H. (1973). The Nature of Managerial Work. New York: Harper & Row.
• Mohnen, P., & Hall, B. H. (2013). Innovation and productivity: An update. Eurasian Business Review, 3(1), 47-65.
• Organizational Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3®) Knowledge Foundation (2003). Cleveland. PMI.
• Pelle, A., & Tabajdi, G. (2021). Covid-19 and transformational megatrends in the European automotive industry: Evidence from business decisions with a Central and Eastern European focus. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 9(4), 19-33. doi: 10.15678/EBER.2021.090402
• Potoczek, N. R. (2021). The use of process benchmarking in the water industry to introduce changes in the digitization of the company’s value chain. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management, and Innovation, 17(4), 51-89. doi: 10.7341/20211743
• Ramadani, V., Hisrich, R. D., Abazi-Alili, H., Dana, L. P., Panthi, L., & Abazi-Bexheti, L. (2019). Product innovation and firm performance in transition economies: A multi-stage estimation approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 271- 280.
• Shen, H., Gao, Y., & Yang, X. (2017). Matching organizational climate and control mechanisms for fast strategic change in transitional economics: Evidence from China. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30(2), 124-141. doi: 10.1108/JOCM-04-2016-0064
• Schumpeter, J. (1939). Business Cycles, New York.
• Shpak, N., Kuzmin, O., Dvulit, Z., Onysenko, T., & Sroka, W. (2020). Digitalization of the Marketing Activities of Enterprises: Case Study. Information, 11, 109. doi: 10.3390/info11020109
• Shpak, N., Ohinok, S., Kulyniak, I., Sroka, W., Fedun, Y., Ginevičius, R., & Cygler, J. (2022), CO2 Emissions and Macroeconomic Indicators: Analysis of the Most Polluted Regions in the World. Energies, 15, 2928. doi: 10.3390/en15082928
• Shpak, N., Satalkina, L., Sroka, W., & Hittmar, S. (2017). The social direction of enterprises’ innovation activity. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 16(1), 187- 201. doi: 10.17512/pjms.2017.16.1.16
• Shpak, N., Odrekhivskyi, M., Doroshkevych, K., & Sroka, W. (2019). Simulation of innovative systems under industry 4.0 conditions. Social Sciences, 8, 202. doi: 10.3390/socsci8070202
• Skrodzka, W. (2021). The impact of the pandemic on the investments effectiveness in the shares of IT sector companies listed on the Warsaw stock exchange. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 24(2), 414-430. doi: 10.17512/pjms.2021.24.2.26
• Sorgner, A., Bode, E., & KriegerBoden, C. (2017). The effects of digitalization on gender equality in the G20 economies. Kiel: Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
• Sowden R., Hinley, D., Clarke, S. (2008). Portfolio, Programme and Project Management Maturity Model: P3M3 Public Consultation Draft v.2.0. London: Office of Government Commerce.
• Stark, R., Kind, S., & Neumeyer, S. (2017). Innovations in digital modelling for next generation manufacturing system design. CIRP Annals, 66(1), 169-172. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.045
• Sujova, A., & Simanova, L. (2021). Improvement of production process capability — a case study of two furniture companies. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 13(3), 37-49. doi: 10.2478/emj-2021-0020
• Szpilko, D., & Ejdys, J. (2022). European Green Deal — research directions. A systematic literature review. Ekonomia i Środowisko, 81(2), 8-38. doi: 10.34659/eis.2022.81.2.455
• Tugan-Baranovsky, M. I. (2004). Industrial crises. Essay on the social history of England. К.: Science. Opinion.
• Tena-Chollet, F., Tixier, J., Dandrieux, A., & Slangen, P. (2017). Training decision-makers: Existing strategies for natural and technological crisis management and specifications of an improved simulation-based tool. Safety Science, 97, 144-153. doi: org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.03.025
• The level of maturity of the standardization system of business processes of the company. Test. Retrieved from http://www.finexpert.ru/tests.php.
• Thiers, G. S., Graunke, A., & Christian, M. (2016). Automated production system simulations using commercial off-the-shelf simulation tools. In P. I. Frazier, R. Szechtman, E. Zhou, T. Huschka, & S. E. Chick (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 1036-1047). Piscataway: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/WSC.2016.7822163
• Uhlemann, T. H.-J., Lehmann, C., & Steinhilper, R. (2017). The Digital Twin: Realizing the Cyber-Physical Production System for Industry 4.0. In V S. Takata, Y. Umeda, & S. Kondoh (Eds.), Procedia CIRP: Proceedings of The 24th CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, 335-340. doi: 10.1016/j. procir.2016.11.152
• Usyk, Y. (2015). The cyclical development of the economy - Challenges for Ukraine. Theoretical and practical aspects of economy and intellectual property. Vip, 2(3), 78-84.
• Verba, V.A. (2014). The evolution of managerial technologies as a reflection of the problems and tasks of enterprise development. Strategy of Ukraine’s Economic Development, 34, 148-156.
• Vojtovic, S. (2016). The Impact of the Structural Funds on Competitiveness of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises. Journal of Competitiveness, 8(4), 30-45. doi: 10.7441/joc.2016.04.02
• Visagie, C. M., & Steyn, C. (2011). Organisational commitment and responses to planned organisational change: An exploratory study. Southern African Business Review, 15(3), 98-121.
• Vveinhardt, J., & Sroka, W. (2020). Mobbing and Corporate Social Responsibility: Does the status of the organisation guarantee employee wellbeing and intentions to stay in the job? Oeconomia Copernicana, 11(4), 743-778. doi: 10.24136/oc.2020.030
• Vytvytska, O., Martynyuk, O., Shpak, N., Karcheva, G., Medynsky, I., Nodzhak, L. (2020). Structural-functional modeling for the determination of the company’s equilibrium conditions in the dynamic business environment. Mathematical Modeling and Computing, 7(1), 104-111. doi: 10.23939/mmc2020.01.104
• Weiner, B. (2009). A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science, 4(67). doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-67
• Wijaya, P. Y., & Suasih, N. N. R. (2020). The Effect of Knowledge Management on Competitive Advantage and Business Performance: A Study of Silver Craft SMEs. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(4), 105-121. doi: 10.15678/EBER.2020.080406
• Zhao, J. X. (2018). An empirical study on the impact of technological innovation on economic growth-taking Shandong Province as an example. Proceedings of the 4th Annual International Conference on Social Science and Contemporary Humanity Development (SSCHD) (pp. 454-457). doi: 10.2991/sschd-18.2019.82

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).