Effect of robot utterances using onomatopoeia on collaborative learning

• Autorzy: Jimenez F. , Kanoh M. , Yoshikawa T. , Furuhashi T. , Nakamura T.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/jaiscr-2015-0003

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

We investigated the effect of robot’s utterances using onomatopoeia in collaborative learning. The robot was designed to provide encouragement using onomatopoeia when students are given problems to be solved issued by a learning system. Eight college students used a mathematics learning system with a robot for three weeks and then took exams. The results indicated that the robot using utterances with onomatopoeia could comfort learners more than the robot without onomatopoeia. It suggests that the robot that praises or comforts using onomatopoeia helps learners maintain their motivation in collaborative learning.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

robot; onomatopoeia; collaborative learning

• Wydawca: University of Social Sciences
• Czasopismo: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing Research
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Vol. 4, No. 2
• Strony: 125--131
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 21 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Jimenez F.

• Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University Furo-cho, Chikusa, Nagoya, 464-8603, Aichi, Japan

autor

Kanoh M.

• School of Engineering, Chukyo University 101-2 Yagoto Honmachi, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8666, Aichi, Japan

autor

Yoshikawa T.

• Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University Furo-cho, Chikusa, Nagoya, 464-8603, Aichi, Japan

autor

Furuhashi T.

• Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University Furo-cho, Chikusa, Nagoya, 464-8603, Aichi, Japan

autor

Nakamura T.

• Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology Gokiso-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8555, Aichi, Japan

Bibliografia

• [1] T. Kanda, T. Hirano, D. Eaton and H. Ishiguro :“Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial,” Hum-Comout. Interact., vol.10, No.1, pp.61-84, 2004.
• [2] O.H. Kwon, S.Y. Koo, Y.G. Kim and D.S. Kwon: “Telepresence robot system for english tutoring,” IEEEWorkshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts, pp.152-155, 2010.
• [3] T. Kand: “How a communication Robot Can Contribute to Education (in Japanese),” Journal of Japanese Society for artificial Intelligence, Vol.23, No.2, pp.229-236, 2008.
• [4] K.Shinozawa, F.Naya, J.Yamato and K.Kogure: “Differences in effect of robot and screen agent recommendations on human decision-making,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol.62, No.2, pp.267-279, 2005.
• [5] W.A. Bainbridge, J. Hart, E.S. Kim and B. Scassellati: “The effect of presence on human-robot interaction,” IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp.701-706, 2008.
• [6] S. Koizumi, T. Kanda and T. Miyashita: “Collaborative learning experiment with social robot (in Japanese),” Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan,Vol.29, No.10, pp.902-906, 2011.
• [7] F. Tanaka: “Social robotics research and its application at early childhood education (in Japanese),” ,Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan,Vol.29, No.1, pp.19-22, 2011.
• [8] H. Namiki: “Kotobakake no kouka no zikkenkekka kara (in Japanese),” Child psychology, Vol.47, No.5, pp.474-477, 1993.
• [9] T. Komatsu and H. Akiyama: “Expression system of onomatopoeias for assisting users’ intuitive expressions (in Japanese),” The Journal of the Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers A,Vol.J92-A, No.11, pp.752-763, 2009.
• [10] Y.Fujino, M.Kikkawa and Y.Sagisaka: “A collection of onomatopeias in japan sports (in Japanese),” Proc Oriental Cocosda, pp.160-164, 2003.
• [11] M. Takano and M. Udo: “Onomatopoeia in the utterances of teachers at special schools (in Japanese),” The Japanese Association of Special Education, Vol.48, No.2, pp.75-84, 2010.
• [12] M. Takano and M. Udo: “Contribution of onomatopoeia to educational support for children with severe mental retardation (in Japanese),” The Journal of School Education,Vol.19, pp.27-37,2007.
• [13] H. Shinagawa: “2014 SyuSyokukatudou no Kamisama no SPI2 mondaisyu (in Japanese),” UCAN-pub, 2012.
• [14] F.Jimenez and M.Kanoh: “Robot that can promote learning by observing in collaborative learning,” IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2013.
• [15] E.B.Hurlock: “An evaluation of certain incentives used in school work,” Journal of Education Psychology, Vol.16, pp.145-150, 1925.
• [16] H. Nakajima, Y. Moroshima, R. Yamada, S. Kawaji, S. Brave, H. Maldonado and C. Nass: “Social Intelligence in a Human-Machine Collaboration System : Social Responses of Agents with Mind Model and Personality (in Japanese),”Journal of Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, Vol.19, No.3, pp.184-196, 2004.
• [17] M.Ono: “Giongo Gitaigo 4500 Nihongo Onomatope Ziten (in Japanese),” Syougakkan, 2007.
• [18] C.E.Osgood: “Studies on the generality of affective meaning systems,” American Psychologist, Vol.17, pp.10-28, 1962.
• [19] T. Ogata and S. Sugano: “Experimental Evaluation of the Emotional Communication between Robots and Humans,” ISCIE Journal ’Systems, Control ,and Information,Vol.13, No.12, pp.566-574, 2000.
• [20] T. Kanda, H. Ishiguro and T. Ishida: “Psychological Evaluation on Interactions between People and Robot (in Japanese),” Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan, Vol.19, No.3, pp.362-371, 2001.
• [21] Y. Miyake and N. Miyake : “Pedagogical psychology (in Japanese),” Foundation for the Promotionof The Open University of Japan, 2012