Exploring an entrepreneurial ecosystem with regard to business-science-government cooperation: preliminary research findings

• Autorzy: Badzińska Ewa

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2022.158.1

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The paper provides a theoretical foundation of entrepreneurial ecosystems with strong focus on start-up ecosystem. The empirical purpose of the study is to identify the key actors, institutions and organisations which can provide a nurturing environment and services for the creation of the start-up ecosystem of the city of Poznań with regard to business-science-government collaboration. Design/methodology/approach: The research applies the method of in-depth semi-structured direct interview with experts in the field of support services to potential founders and start-ups with academic origin, the case study method, participatory observation, and reflection. The explorative qualitative study uses both descriptive and explanatory techniques. Findings: The research findings provide insight in the real nature of the local start-up ecosystem presenting its key stakeholders, the scope of their support and ways of creating a conducive environment for potential founders and start-ups. The research results highlight the importance of studying the interdependencies among key actors in the start-up ecosystem in order to provide them with necessary resources and to stimulate the synergy effect. Research limitations/implications: Research limitations resulting from the analysis of a purposefully-selected case of the start-up ecosystem do not allow formulating general conclusions. Nevertheless, it illustrates a real business practice and challenges of the development of the specific entrepreneurial ecosystem. Future research line will concern an in-depth analysis of the most critical obstacles in the process of start-up creation as well as the assessment of the interdependencies among the key stakeholders of the start-up ecosystem to look for more effective cooperation. Practical implications: The synthesis of the current reflections on entrepreneurial ecosystems and the research findings reflected here can benefit both employees of business incubators, researchers, and entrepreneurship teachers and become an inspiration for further analysis and extended research on problems associated with increasing the efficiency and sustainability of local start-up ecosystems and the need to build valuable relationships with key stakeholders. Originality/value: The originality of the conducted exploratory research lies in presenting the real business practice and challenges of the development of the specific entrepreneurial ecosystem, and thus contribute to the discussion on the dilemmas associated with conducting the more effective practice-oriented research on start-up ecosystems.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

entrepreneurial ecosystem; entrepreneurship; startup ecosystem; incubator; triple helix

PL

ekosystem przedsiębiorczości; przedsiębiorczość; ekosystem startupów; inkubator; potrójna helisa

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: z. 158
• Strony: 9--26
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 35 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Badzińska Ewa

• Poznan University of Technology, Faculty of Engineering Management

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2621-976X

Bibliografia

• 1. Badzińska, E., Mrugalska, B. (2022). Technological Entrepreneurship and Entrepreneurial University towards Greater Effectiveness of Business-Science Cooperation. In: J. Duda, T. Bernat (Eds.), Science, Business and Universities Cooperation, Knowledge Transfer and Entrepreneurship (pp. 145-155). Milton, United States: Taylor & Francis Group Routledge.
• 2. Badzińska, E., Alt, R. (2021). Providing a Nurturing Environment for Start-up Incubation: An Explorative Study of a University-based Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. European Research Studies Journal, Vol. 24, Spec. Iss. 5, pp. 15-29, doi: 10.24917/20833296.171.
• 3. Blank, S., Dorf, B. (2012). The Startup Owner's Manual: The Step-By-Step Guide for Building a Great Company. Pescadero, Calif.: K & S Ranch, Inc.
• 4. Brown, R., Mason, C. (2017). Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, Vol. 49, Iss. 1, pp. 11-30, doi: 10.1007/s11187-017-9865-7.
• 5. Buła, P., Schroeder, T. (2020). Selected Aspects of the Co-Evolution of the Polish Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. Organization Review, Vol. 10, Iss. 969, pp. 20-27, doi: 10.33141/po.2020.10.0/3.
• 6. Chan, S. (2001). cbcbComp/lex Adaptive Systems, ESD.83 Research Seminar in Engineering Systems. 31 October / 6 November.
• 7. Cohen, B. (2006). Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 15, Iss. 1, pp. 11-14.
• 8. Deloitte (2016). Diagnoza ekosystemu startupów w Polsce. Retrieved from http://branden.biz/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Deloitte_raport_startupy.pdf, 20.03.2021.
• 9. Etzkowitz, H. (2002). Incubation of incubators: innovation as a triple helix of university-industry-government networks. Science and Public Policy, Vol. 29, Iss. 2, p. 115-128, doi: 10.3152/147154302781781056.
• 10. Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: university-industry-government innovation in action. New York: Routledge.
• 11. Etzkowitz, H. (2016). The Entrepreneurial University: Vision and Metrics. Industry and Higher Education, Vol. 30, Iss. 2, pp. 83-97, doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2016.0303.
• 12. Freiling, J., Baron, T. (2017). A Resource-based View of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. In: W. Burr, M. Stephan (Eds.), Technology, Strategy und Organisation (pp. 65-84). Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.
• 13. Glinka, B., Czakon, W. (2021). Podstawy badań jakościowych. Warszawa: PWE.
• 14. InCredibles, Retrieved from https://incredibleinspirations.com/, 20.05.2022.
• 15. Isenberg D., Onyemah, V. (2016). Fostering Scale Up Ecosystems for Regional Economic Growth. In: Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization (pp. 71-97). Special Edition for Global Entrepreneurship Congress, Medellin.
• 16. Isenberg, D.J. (2010). How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 88, Iss. 6, pp. 40-50.
• 17. Isenberg, D.J. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economy policy: principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project. Babson Park, MA: Babson College.
• 18. Mason, C., Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Growth Oriented Entrepreneurship: Final Report, Vol. 30, pp. 77-102. Paris, France: OECD.
• 19. Moore, J.F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 71, pp. 75-86.
• 20. Polskie Startupy (2021). Raport. Warszawa: Startup Poland.
• 21. Ries, E. (2011). The Lean Startup: How Today's Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses. New York: Crown Business.
• 22. Skala, A. (2018). Startupy. Wyzwanie dla zarządzania i edukacji przedsiębiorczości. Kraków-Legionowo: edu-Libri.
• 23. Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 41, Iss. 1, pp. 49-72, doi: 10.1111/etap.12167.
• 24. Spigel, B. (2020). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: Theory, practice, futures. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• 25. Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, Vol. 23, Iss. 9, 1759-1769, doi: 10.1080/09654313. 2015.1061484.
• 26. Stam, E., Spigel, B. (2016). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. USE Discussion Paper Series, 16-13, 1-15.
• 27. Stam, E., Spigel, B. (2017). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems, Forthcoming. In: R. Blackburn, D. De Clercq, J. Heinonen, Z. Wang (Eds.), Handbook for Entrepreneurship and Small Business. London: SAGE.
• 28. Stam, E., Welter, F. (2020). Geographical contexts of entrepreneurship: Spaces, places and entrepreneurial agency. Working Papers, 4. Bonn: Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM).
• 29. Studenci 2020/2021. Retrieved from https://badam.poznan.pl/2021-studenci/, 20.05.2022.
• 30. Sułkowski, Ł. (2012). Epistemologia i metodologia zarządzania. Warszawa: PWE.
• 31. The Global Startup Ecosystem Report (2017). Startup Genome, pp. 14-29. Retrieved from https://startupgenome.com/, 28.04.2022.
• 32. Theodoraki, Ch., Messeghem, K., Rice, M.P. (2018). A social capital approach to the development of sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: an explorative study. Small Business Economics, Vol. 51, pp. 153-170, doi: 10.1007/s11187-017-9924-0.
• 33. Tomski, P. (2018). Ekosystem jako poszerzona perspektywa postrzegania przedsiębiorczości. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, Firmy rodzinne - zarządzanie, rozwój, przedsiębiorczość, Vol. 19, Iss. 7, Part. 3, pp. 113-129.
• 34. Wallisch, M., Gorynia-Pfeffer, N., Morgenstern, K., Ahluwalia, R.D., Koch, A., Depner, H., Fernández-Sánchez, N., Wolff von der Sahl, J., Starke, Ch. (2019). Gründerökosysteme gestalten. Handbuch zur Unterstützung von Gründungen und Startups. Eschborn: RKW Kompetenzzentrum.
• 35. Yin, R.K. (2013). Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).