Generational differences in the perception of the meaning and value of work: an attempt at explanation using Strauss-Howe generational theory

• Autorzy: Andrałojć Magdalena

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2024.201.1

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: What is the meaning and value of human work? This article attempts to answer this question from the perspective of different generations: employees representing Generation X and Y (Nomads and Heroes) and primary school students, representing late Z and Alpha generations (Artists and Prophets). The research problem addressed in this article is the perception of the meaning and value of work. The aim is to compare this between young and adult individuals (static dimension of the research) and to attempt to understand and explain the different ways of perceiving the meaning and value of work (dynamic dimension of the research). Design/methodology/approach: Differences in the perception of the meaning and value of work between generations are explained using the Strauss-Howe generational theory, which introduces a dynamic perspective for understanding generational differences. The research material for the analysis was collected through surveys conducted between 2019 and 2022, as part of the NCN project no. 2013/09/D/HS4/02701. Methodological triangulation was applied in the data analysis process: quantitative analysis showing differences between generations and qualitative analysis explaining these differences. Findings: The constructs of work perception among young people and adults are based on different value systems. Adults more frequently use an ‘outward’ narrative to describe the meaning and value of work (what their work gives to the world), whereas young people use an ‘inward’ narrative (what work gives to them). Research limitations/implications: The main limitation lies in the assumptions adopted in Strauss-Howe's generational theory. Future research could attempt to replace the proposed by Strauss and Howe circural movement with a spiral movement, thereby seeking the driving forces behind this movement, manifested in generational differences. Practical implications: HR practices in diversity management. Social implications: Better understand different social groups (generations) attitudes. Originality/value: An original approach is the adoption of the category of values rather than attitudes in the analysis to explain generational differences and implementation historical background in explanation work value differences between generations (dynamic approach).

Słowa kluczowe

EN

perception of work; generational differences; Strauss-Howe generational theory; work meaning; work value

PL

percepcja pracy; różnice pokoleniowe; teoria pokoleniowa Straussa-Howe'a; znaczenie pracy; wartość pracy

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: z. 201
• Strony: 7--22
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 27 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Andrałojć Magdalena

• Poznań Univeristy of Economics and Business

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3233-5334

Bibliografia

• 1. Andralojc, M. (2015). The nature of work and its social dimension from an economic and sociological point of view. In: E. Kolasińska, A. Mrozowicki, J. Róg-Ilnicka (eds.), Społeczne wymiary pracy w późnym kapitalizmie. Humanizacja Pracy, No. 3(281), pp. 49-65.
• 2. Andrałojć, M. (2023a). Jak Feniks z popiołów. O wartości pracy w kontekście krytyki radykalnego neoliberalizmu. In: J. Sójka (ed.), Zadania etyki gospodarczej w dobie kryzysu. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Nauk Społecznych i Humanistycznych UAM, pp. 51-72.
• 3. Andrałojć, M. (2023b). Społeczna wartość pracy w świetle badań nad istotą i znaczeniem pracy zawodowej. Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Górnośląskiej, no. 3, pp. 5-14.
• 4. Andrałojć, M., Ławrynowicz, M. (2012). Elastyczny system wynagrodzeń w motywowaniu pokolenia Y. Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi, No. 5, pp. 49-62.
• 5. Baltes, P.B. (1987). Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, No. 23(5), pp. 611-626.
• 6. Brown, G.S. (2020). After Gen Z, meet Gen Alpha. What to know about the generation born 2010 to today. ABC News, https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Family/gen-meet-gen-alpha- generation-born-2010-today/story?id=68971965, 11.01.2021.
• 7. Czerw, A. (2013). Co ludzie myślą o pracy zawodowej. Psychologia Społeczna, No. 2(25), pp. 219-233.
• 8. Dose, J.J. (1997). Work values: An integrative framework and illustrative application to organizational socialization. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, No. 70, pp. 219-240.
• 9. Elizur, D. (1984). Facets of work values: A structural analysis of work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, No. 69, pp. 379-389.
• 10. Fatyga, B. (2005). Pokolenie. In: H. Kubiak (ed.), Encyklopedia socjologii. Suplement. Oficyna Naukowa.
• 11. Folta, M. (2020). X, Y, i Z. Teoria cyklów pokoleniowych Straussa-Howe’a w świetle wcześniejszych teorii. Konteksty Społeczne, Vol. 8, No. 2(16), pp. 23-37.
• 12. Furedi, F. (2013). Authority: A Sociological History. Cambridge University Press.
• 13. Hertel, G., Zacher, H. (2018). Managing the aging workforce. In: D.S. Ones, N. Anderson, C. Viswesvaran, H.K. Sinangil (eds.), The Sage handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology, vol.3 (pp. 396-428). Sage.
• 14. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences. Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations, Sage Publications. Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi.
• 15. Hornsey, M.J. (2008). Social identity theory and self- categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 204-222.
• 16. Iorgulescu, M.C. (2016). Generation Z and its perception of work. Cross-Cultural Management Journal, Vol. XVIII, Iss. 1(9), pp. 47-54.
• 17. Johnson, M.K. (2002). Social origins, adolescent experiences, and work value trajectories during the transition to adulthood. Social Forces, No. 80, pp. 1307-1340.
• 18. Kinger, N., Kumar, S. (2023). Generational differences in work values in the workplace. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Vol 23, Iss. 2, pp. 204-221.
• 19. Kooij, D., de Lange, A., Jansen, P., Dikkers, J. (2008). Older workers’ motivation to continue to work: Five meanings of age. Journal of Managerial Psychology, No. 23, pp. 364-394.
• 20. Kwiecińska, M., Grzesik, K., Siewierska-Chmaj, A., Popielska-Borys, A. (2023). Generational differences in values and patterns of thinking in the workplace. Argumenta Oeconomica, No. 1(50), pp. 95-118.
• 21. Mackay, H. (2002). Generations: Baby Boomers, Their Parents and Their Children. Pan Macmillan Australia.
• 22. McCrindle, M. (2020). Understanding Generation Alpha. cCrindle Research Pty Ltd, Solent Circuit, https://generationalpha.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Understanding- Generation-Alpha-McCrindle.pdf, 20.11.2023.
• 23. Ossowska, M. (1963). Koncepcja pokolenia. Studia Socjologiczne, No. 2.
• 24. Rudolph, C.W., Zacher, H. (2022). Research on age(ing) at work has ‘come of age’. In: H. Zacher, C.W. Rudolph (eds.), Age and work: Advances in theory, methods, and practice (pp. 3-24). SIOP Organizational Frontiers Series. New York: Routledge.
• 25. Strauss, W., Howe, N. (1997). The Fourth Turning: What the Cycles of History Tell Us About America's Next Rendezvous with Destiny. New York: Random House USA Inc.
• 26. Winter, R.P, Jackson, B.A. (2016). Work values preferences of Generation Y: performance relationship insights in the Australian Public Service. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 27, No. 17, pp. 1997-2015.
• 27. Wojtaszczyk, A. (2016). Przynależność generacyjna jako determinanta postaw wobec pracy. Stereotypy a rzeczywistość. Edukacja Ekonomistów i Menedżerów, No. 1(39), pp. 29-40.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).