The effect of different forms of sulphur on incidence of apple scab on apple tree (Malus x domestica Borkh) Gloster cv.

• Autorzy: Bělíková Hana , Mészáros Martin , Varga Ladislav , Árvay Július , Wiśniowska-Kielian Barbara , Gondek Krzysztof , Antonkiewicz Jacek , Torma Stanislav , Lazarević Boris , Bennewitz Eduardo , Lošák Tomáš

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/eces-2019-0015

Warianty tytułu

PL

Wpływ różnych form siarki na występowanie parcha jabłoniowego na jabłoniach (Malus x domestica Borkh) odmiany Gloster

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

From 2014 to 2015 the influence of foliar application of sulphur on apple trees (Gloster cv.)was investigated in the apple orchard at the Research and Breeding Institute of Pomology in Holovousy (North-East Bohemia, Czech Republic). The experiment was based on foliar applications of fertilizers containing different forms of sulphur: elemental S⁰, sulphate SO₄²⁻ and thiosulphate S₂O₃²⁻ (in combination with other macro- and microelements) and fungicides with or without sulphur: Kumulus (S⁰ + F) and the conventional fungicide programme (F), in the respective treatments. Apple scab incidence on leaves and fruits was investigated in each experimental year according to the relevant methodology of the OEPP/EPPO standard PP1/5(3) Venturia inaequalis. Data on the incidence of apple scab correlate with the process of pathogen life cycle and risk of infection on the given dates. The incidence of apple scab was the lowest in 2014 in treatment S⁰ + F (10.8 % on leaves, 2.8 % on fruits) and F (15.8 % on leaves, 6 % on fruits) where conventional fungicides were used. When compared with the other treatments these treatments were the most effective even if the incidence of scab in the individual treatments in 2015 increased by 28 to 60 % due to high infection pressure. The results confirmed the efficiency of the conventional fungicide programme (S⁰ + F and F) against apple scab incidence on fruits. What is more, the results were slightly better in the treatment, where the conventional fungicide programme was combined with fertilizer containing elemental S (S⁰ + F) in comparison with fungicides applied alone (F). The effect of the other forms of sulphur (SO₄ and S₂O₃) on apple scab control has not been confirmed. According to the results, the application of the conventional fungicide programme (S⁰ + F and F) is more effective against scab incidence than the inorganic forms of sulphur alone.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

foliar fertilization; fungicide; apple orchard; Venturia inaequalis

PL

nawożenie dolistne; środek grzybobójczy; sad jabłkowy; Venturia inaequalis

• Wydawca: Towarzystwo Chemii i Inżynierii Ekologicznej
• Czasopismo: Ecological Chemistry and Engineering. S
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 26, nr 1
• Strony: 199--208
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 33 poz., rys., wykr., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Bělíková Hana

• Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

autor

Mészáros Martin

• Research and Breeding Institute of Pomology Holovousy Ltd., Holovousy 129, 508 01 Hořice, Czech Republic,phone [phone]

autor

Varga Ladislav

• Department of Agrochemistry and Plant Nutrition, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia

autor

Árvay Július

• Department of Chemistry, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia

autor

Wiśniowska-Kielian Barbara

• Department of Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry, University of Agriculture in Krakow, al. A. Mickiewicza 21, 31-120 Kraków, Poland

autor

Gondek Krzysztof

• Department of Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry, University of Agriculture in Krakow, al. A. Mickiewicza 21, 31-120 Kraków, Poland

autor

Antonkiewicz Jacek

• Department of Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry, University of Agriculture in Krakow, al. A. Mickiewicza 21, 31-120 Kraków, Poland

autor

Torma Stanislav

• National Agricultural and Food Centre, Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute, regional work place Prešov, Raymannova 1, 080 01 Prešov, Slovak Republic

autor

Lazarević Boris

• Department of Plant Nutrition, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunskacesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

autor

Bennewitz Eduardo

• Institute of Plant Production and Protection, Universidad Austral de Chile, Campus Isla Teja, Isla Teja s/n. Valdivia, Chile

autor

Lošák Tomáš

• Faculty of Regional Development and International Studies, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

Bibliografia

• [1] OEPP/EPPO. EPPO standards PP 2/18(1), Guidelines on good plant protection practice. Pome fruits. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin. 2004;29:379-406. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2338.2004.00704.x.
• [2] Jamar L, Cavelier M, Lateur M. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ. 2010;14(3):423-439.DOI: 10.1007/s10658-008-9315-0.
• [3] Holb IJ, Schnabel G. Australas Plant Pathol. 2008;37(5):454-459. DOI: 10.1071/AP08041.
• [4] Jamar I, Lefrancq B, Fassotte C, Lateur M. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2008;122(4):481-493. DOI: 10.1071/AP08041.
• [5] Profaizer D, Baldessari M, Giuliani G, Angeli G. IOBC-WPRS Bulletin. 2013;91:73-79. https://www.iobc-wprs.org/members/shop_en.cfm?mod_Shop_detail_produkte=19.
• [6] Rossi V, Giosuè S, Bugiani R. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin. 2003;33(3):407-414. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2338.2003.00665.x.
• [7] Carisse O, Tremblay D-M, Jobin T, Walker AS. Disease decision support systems: their impact on disease management and durability of fungicide effectiveness. In: Carisse O, editor. Fungicides, 1st ed. Rijeka: InTech; 2010;177-200. DOI: 10.5772/13335.
• [8] González-Domínguez E, Armengol J, Rossi V. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1-19. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01496.
• [9] Hawkesford M, Horst W, Kichey T, Lambers H, Schjoerring J, Skrumsager Møller I, White P. Functions of macronutrients. In: Marchner P, editor. Marchner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 3rded. London: Academic Press; 2012;135-189. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-384905-2.00006-6.
• [10] Saha B, Saha S, Roy PD, Padhan D, Pati S, Hazra GC. Microbial transformation of sulfur: an approach to combat the sulphur deficiencies in agricultural soils. In: Meena VS, editor. Role of Rhizospheric Microbes in Soil: Volume 2: Nutrient Management and Crop Improvement, 1st ed. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2018;77-97. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-0044-8.
• [11] Sager M. Agriculture. 2012;2(1):1-11. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture2010001.
• [12] Haneklaus S, Bloem B, Schnug E, De Kok LJ, Stulen I. Sulfur. In: Barker AV, Pilbeam DJ, editors. Handbook of Plant Nutrition. New York: Taylor and Francis Group; 2007;183-238. ISBN: 978082475904-9.
• [13] Balík J, Kulhánek M, Černý J, Száková J, Pavlíková D, Čermák P. Plant Soil Environ. 2009;55(8):344-352. DOI:10.17221/101/2009-PSE.
• [14] Neilsen GH, Neilsen D. Nutritional Requirements of Apple. In: Ferree DC, Warrington IJ, editors. Apples: Botany, Production and Uses, 1st ed. Oxon: CAB International; 2003;12:267-302. DOI:10.1079/9780851995922.0267.
• [15] Prasad R, Shivay YS. Sulfur in soil, plant and human nutrition. Proc National Acad Sci, India Sect B Biol Sci. 2018;88(2):429-434. DOI: 10.1007/s40011-016-0769-0.
• [16] Oulehle F, Kopáček J, Chuman T, Černohous V, Hůnová I, Hruška J, et al. Atmos Environ. 2016;140:456-468. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.028.
• [17] Zhao FJ, Knights JS, Hu ZY, McGrath SP. J Environ Qual. 2003;32(1):33-39. DOI: 10.2134/jeq2003.3300.
• [18] Dick WA, Kost D, Chen L. Availability of Sulfur to Crops from Soil and Other Sources. In: Jez J, editor. Sulfur: A Missing Link between Soils, Crops, and Nutrition, 1st ed. Washington, USA: American Society of Agronomy; 2008;59-82. DOI: 10.2134/agronmonogr50.c5.
• [19] Lucheta AR, Lambais MR. Rev Bras Cienc Solo. 2012;36(5):1369-1379. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-06832012000500001.
• [20] Kopáček J, Veselý J. Atmos Environ. 2005;39(12):2179-2188. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.01.002.
• [21] Scherer HW. Eur J Agron. 2001;14(2):81-111. DOI: 10.1016/S1161-0301(00)00082-4.
• [22] OEPP/EPPO. EPPO standards PP 1/5(3). Efficacy evaluation of fungicides. Venturia inaequalis and V. Pyrina. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin: Paris, France, 1990;20(3):1-18. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2338.1990.tb00166.x.
• [23] Holb IJ, De Jong PF, Heijne B. Ann Appl Biol. 2003;142(2):225-233. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2003.tb00245.x.
• [24] Pavlista AD. Agron J. 2005;97(2):599-603. DOI: 10.2134/agronj2005.0599.
• [25] Rossi V, Giosuè S, Bugiani R. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin. 2007;37(2):300-308. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2338.2007.01125.x.
• [26] Abott CP, Beckerman JL. Plant Dis. 2018;102(1):231-236. DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-05-17-0629-RE.
• [27] Ellis MA, Ferree DC, Funt RC, Madden LV. Plant Dis. 1998;82(4):428-433. DOI: 10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.4.428.
• [28] Gianessi LP, Reigner N. The Value of Fungicides in U.S. Crop Production. Washington: Crop Life Foundation; 2005;183. https://croplifefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/fungicide-full-report.pdf.
• [29] Holb IJ. Europ J Hort Sci. 2007;72(2):60-65. https://www.pubhort.org/ejhs/2007/file_254544.pdf.
• [30] Cromwell ML, Berkett LP, Darby HM. Hort Sci. 2011;46(9):1254-1259. DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI.46.9.1254.
• [31] Holb IJ. Plant Dis. 2016;100(9):1894-1905.DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-12-15-1416-RE.
• [32] Williams JS, Cooper RM. Plant Pathol. 2004;53(3):263-279. DOI: 10.1111/j.0032-0862.2004.01010.x.
• [33] Jamar L, Song J, Fauche F, Choi J, Lateur M. J Plant Dis Prot. 2017;124:383-391. DOI: 10.1007/s41348-017-0085-9.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).