Analiza użyteczności interfejsów wybranych serwisów streamingowych w Polsce

• Autorzy: Nankiewicz Paweł , Niemczuk Mateusz , Plechawska-Wójcik Małgorzata

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35784/jcsi.3043

Warianty tytułu

EN

Interface usability analysis of selected streaming services in Poland

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

Celem niniejszej pracy jest dokonanie analizy jakości interfejsu wybranych serwisów udostępniających usługę wideo na życzenie na polskim rynku internetowym. Ocenie poddano interfejsy trzech serwisów: Netflix, Amazon Prime Video oraz Player. Ewaluację przeprowadzono, wykorzystując analizę ekspercką, badanie okulograficzne oraz ocenę dostępności internetowym narzędziem WAVE. Na potrzeby badania postawiono tezę badawczą wśród trzech badanych interfejsów portali streamingowych, serwis Netflix posiada najbardziej użyteczny interfejs. W wyniku przeprowadzonej ewaluacji trzema metodami badawczymi została ona potwierdzona

EN

The aim of this paper is to analyse the interface quality of selected services providing video-on-demand on the Polish internet market. Interfaces of three services were evaluated (Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, and Player). The evaluation was conducted using an expert review, an eye-tracking study, and an accessibility assessment using the WAVE web tool. For the study, a research thesis was established – Netflix has the most usable interface among the three streaming portal interfaces studied. As a result of the evaluation of three research methods, the thesis has been confirmed.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

użyteczność WWW; dostępność WWW; okulografia; ocena heurystyczna; platformy VoD

EN

usability; accessibility; eye tracking; expert review; video on demand

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Lubelskiej
• Czasopismo: Journal of Computer Sciences Institute
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 25
• Strony: 371--378
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 21 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Nankiewicz Paweł

• Department of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland

autor

Niemczuk Mateusz

• Department of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland

autor

Plechawska-Wójcik Małgorzata

• Department of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. M. Miłosz, Ergonomia systemów informatycznych, Politechnika Lubelska, 2014.
• 2. S. Krug, Don’t make me think!, revisited: A common sense approach to web usability, 3rd Edition, New Riders, 2014.
• 3. A. Majooni, A. Akhavan, D. Offenhuber, An eye-tracking study on usability and efficiency of blackboard platform, In 2018 9th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (2018) 281-289.
• 4. M. Miłosz, M. Borys, M. Laskowski, Memorability experiment vs. expert method in websites usability evaluation, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (2013) 176-182.
• 5. M. Plechawska-Wojcik, S. Lujan-Mora, Ł. Wojcik, Assessment of user experience with responsive web applications using expert method and cognitive walkthrough: A case study, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (2013) 60-67.
• 6. F. Paz, F. A. Paz, D. Villanueva, J. A. Pow-Sang, Heuristic evaluation as a complement to usability testing: A case study in web domain, In 2015 12th International Conference on Information Technology – New Generations (2015) 546-551.
• 7. R. Khajouei, A. A. Azizi, A. R. Atashi, Usability evaluation of an emergency information system: A heuristic evaluation, Journal of Health Administration 16 (52) (2013) 61-72.
• 8. M. Miłosz, M. Plechawska-Wojcik, M. Borys, M. Laskowski, Quality improvement of ERP system GUI using expert method: A case study, In 2013 6th International Conference on Human System Interactions (2013) 145-152.
• 9. F. R. Jeddi, E. Nabovati, R. Bigham, R. Farrahi, Usability evaluation of a comprehensive national health information system: A heuristic evaluation, Informatics in Medicine Unlocked 19 (2020) 100332.
• 10. J. Wang, P. Antonenko, M. Celepkolu, Y. Jimenez, E. Fieldman, A. Fieldman, Exploring relationships between eye tracking and traditional usability testing data, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 35 (6) (2019) 483-494.
• 11. X. Yuan, M. Guo, F. Ren, F. Peng, Usability analysis of online bank login interface based on eye tracking experiment, Sensors & Transducers 165 (2) (2014) 203-212.
• 12. J. C. Romano Bergstrom, E. L. Olmsted-Hawala, M. E. Jans, Age-related differences in eye tracking and usability performance: Website usability for older adults, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 29 (8) (2013) 541-548.
• 13. Y. Liu, T. Xi, Study on the interface usability of light control panel in large cruise ship cabin based on eye movement experiment, In 2019 6th International Conference on Information Science and Control Engineering (2019) 913-922.
• 14. S. M. Manson, L. Kne, K. R. Dyke, J. Shannon , S. Eria, Using eye-tracking and mouse metrics to test usability of web mapping navigation, Cartography and Geographic Information Science 39 (1) (2012) 48-60.
• 15. M. Miłosz, M. Chmielewska, Usability testing of e-government online services using different methods – A case study, In 2020 13th International Conference on Human System Interaction (2020) 142-146.
• 16. S. A. Adepoju, I. S. Shehu, Usability evaluation of academic websites using automated tools, In 2014 3rd International Conference on User Science and Engineering (2014) 186-191.
• 17. O. Sohaib, K. Kang, E-commerce web accessibility for people with disabilities, Complexity in Information Systems Development, Springer, 2017.
• 18. Parametry techniczne eyetrackera Gazepoint GP3 HD, https://www.gazept.com/product/gp3hd, [06.05.2022].
• 19. A. Bojko, Eye tracking the user experience: A practical guide to research, Rosenfeld Media, 2013.
• 20. WAVE Web Accessability Evaluation Tool, https://wave.webaim.org, [19.05.2022].
• 21. WCAG 2 Overview, https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag, [12.05.2022].