The “latecomers” of Bougainville: The difficult completion of post-conflict disarmament processes

Bajon, Theò

doi:10.35467/sdq/172296

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

The “latecomers” of Bougainville: The difficult completion of post-conflict disarmament processes

Autorzy

Bajon Theò

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

http://securityanddefence.pl

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35467/sdq/172296

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Post-conflict disarmament processes inherently grapple with definitional challenges regarding definitive endpoints and measures of completion. This paper examines the phenomenon of delayed disarmament through the case study of so-called “latecomers” in Bougainville—ex-combatants who voluntarily surrendered their weapons following the cessation of formal demobilisation, disarmament, and reintegration programming. This study proposes a behavioural model that conceptualises late comer decisionmaking dynamics pertaining to temporary small arms retention. Pivoting upon an iterated security dilemma framework, the model posits that contextual environmental stressors and temporal factors serve as key variables initially sustaining weapons possession in the absence of hostilities. However, this intermediate status carries risks of eventual escalation to renewed violence or protracted and arduous disarmament engagement. The latecomer case reveals the inherent fluidity and uncertainties surrounding delimitations of the disarmament process. Further interrogating ex-combatant dilemmas could strengthen post-conflict policy and practice. Fundamentally, this research demonstrates the enduring temporal ambiguities inherent to disarmament, highlighting the need for pluralistic understandings attentive to issues of indigeneity, humanity, and interpretive meaning central to sustainable peace-building.

Słowa kluczowe

disarmament peacebuilding DDR processes conflict ex-combatant behaviour

Wydawca

Akademia Sztuki Wojennej

Czasopismo

Security and Defence Quarterly

Rocznik

2024

Tom

Vol. 45, No. 1

Strony

82--96

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 41 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Bajon Theò

theo.bajon@un.org

Center for Research on International Security and European Cooperation, 1133 Rue des Résidences, 38400 Saint-Martin d’Hères (France)

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3376-2859

Bibliografia

1. Aghedo I. (2013) ‘Winning the war, losing the peace: Amnesty and the challenges of post-conflict peace-building in the Niger Delta, Nigeria’, Journal of Asian and African Studies, 48(3), pp. 267–280. doi: 10.1177/0021909612453987.
2. Beer F., Sinclair G., Healy A. and Bourne L. (1995) ‘Peace agreement, intractable conflict, escalation trajectory: A psychological laboratory experiment’, International Studies Quarterly, 39(3), pp. 297–312. doi: 10.2307/2600922.
3. Bevan J. (2008) ‘Crisis in Karamoja: Armed violence and the failure of disarmament in Uganda’s most deprived region’, Small Arms Survey, 21(1).
4. Boege V. and Rinck P. (2019) ‘The local/international interface in peace-building: Experiences from Bougainville and Sierra Leone’, International Peacekeeping, 26(2), pp. 216–239. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2018.1561185.
5. Bolton M. (2020). Imagining disarmament, enchanting international relations. Berlin, Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-17716-4.
6. Boshoff H. (2007) ‘Demobilisation, disarmament and reintegration in the democratic Republic of Congo: A never-ending story’, African Security Review, 16(2), pp. 59–62. doi: 10.1080/10246029.2007.9627417.
7. Braithwaite J., Charlesworth H., Reddy P. and Dunn L. (2010) Reconciliation and architectures of commitment: Sequencing peace in Bougainville. Canberra ACT, The Australian National University Press. doi: 10.22459/RAC.09.2010.
8. Breen B. (2016) The Good Neighbour: Australian Peace Support Operations in the Pacific Islands 1980–2006. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139196390.
9. Cardenas J., Pérez N. and Triana S. (2016) ‘Different paths to peace building: A comparative analysis of DDR programs in Colombia and the Province of Aceh, Indonesia’, in Cardenas J., Pérez N. and Triana S. (eds.) Handbook of research on transitional justice and peace building in turbulent regions. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 374–396. doi: 10.4018/978-1-4666-9675-4.ch019.
10. Cochrane G. (2017) Anthropology in the mining industry: Community relations after Bougainville’s civil war. Berlin: Springer.
11. Feldmann T. and Johnson P. (1992) ‘The selfobject function of weapons: A self-psychology examination’, Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 20(4), pp. 561–576. doi: 10.1521/jaap.1.1992.20.4.561.
12. Forsyth M. (2019) ‘Kill all the sorcerers: The interconnections between sorcery, violence, war and peace in Bougainville’, The British Journal of Criminology, 59(4), pp. 842–861. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azy047.
13. Hagen J. (2016) Did sexual orientation and gender identity play a role in the rejection of the Colombian peace deal? Women, Peace and Security. Available at: https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/76859/ (Accessed: 1 September 2023).
14. Janssen O. and van de Vliet E. (1996) ‘Concern for the other’s goals: Key to (de-)escalation of conflict’, International Journal of Conflict Management, 7(2), pp. 99–120. doi: 10.1108/eb022777.
15. Joshi M., Melander E. and Quinn J. (2017) ‘Sequencing the peace: How the order of peace agreement implementation can reduce the destabilizing effects of post-accord elections’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(1), pp. 4–28. doi: 10.1177/0022002715576573.
16. Joshi M. and Quinn J. (2017) ‘Implementing the peace: The aggregate implementation of comprehensive peace agreements and peace duration after intrastate armed conflict’, British Journal of Political Science, 47(4), pp. 869–892. doi: 10.1017/S0007123415000381.
17. Knight M. and Özerdem A. (2004) ‘Guns, camps and cash: disarmament, demobilization and reinsertion of former combatants in transitions from war to peace’, Journal of Peace Research, 41(4), 499–516. doi: 10.1177/0022343304044479.
18. Mansoob Murshed S. (2009) ‘Revisiting the greed and grievance explanations for violent internal conflict’, Journal of International Development, 21(1), pp. 87–111. doi: 10.1002/jid.1478.
19. McKenna K. (2019) Status and implementation of the Bougainville Peace Agreement and implications for referendum. Port Moresby, The National Research Institute of Papua New Guinea.
20. McKenzie-Mohr D. and Dyal J. (1991) ‘Perceptions of threat, tactical efficacy and competing threats as determinants of pro-disarmament behavior’, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6(4), pp. 675-696.
21. Moore A. (2017) ‘Strategic planning for durable peace: The role of effective disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration of ex-combatants as part of the process, and lessons to be learned from MDRP and TDRP in the Great Lakes Region’, in International conference on peace, security and social enterprise, Nairobi, The University of the West of Scotland.
22. Muggah R. (2005) ‘No magic bullet: A critical perspective on disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) and weapons reduction in post-conflict contexts’, The Round Table: The Commonwealth Journal of International Affairs, 94(379), pp. 239–252. doi: 10.1080/00358530500082684.
23. Muggah R. (2006) ‘Emerging from the shadow of war: A critical perspective on DDR and weapons reduction in the post-conflict period’, Contemporary Security Policy, 27(1), pp. 190–205. doi: 10.1080/13523260600603493.
24. Paes W.-C. (2005) ‘The challenges of disarmament, demobilization and reintegration in Liberia’, International Peacekeeping, 12(2), pp. 253–261. doi: 10.1080/13533310500066537.
25. Regan A. (2002) ‘The Bougainville political settlement and the prospects for sustainable peace’, Pacific Economic Bulletin, 12(1), pp. 114–128.
26. Renner M. (1997) Small arms, big impact: The next challenge of disarmament. Collingdale, PA: DIANE Publishing.
27. Ritchie N. (2019) ‘Inventing nuclear disarmament’, Critical Studies on Security, 7(1), pp. 73–77. doi: 10.1080/21624887.2018.1468083.
28. Rubin J., Pruitt D. and Kim S. (1994) Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. New York, NY: Mcgraw-Hill.
29. Rufer R. (2005) Disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration (DDR): Conceptual approaches, specific settings, practical experiences. Geneva: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF).
30. Shubik M. (1968) ‘On the study of disarmament and escalation’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 12(1), pp. 83–101. doi: 10.1177/002200276801200107.
31. Song C., Qu Z., Blumm N. and Barabási A.-L. (2010) ‘Limits of predictability in human mobility’, Science, 327(5968), pp. 1018–1021. doi: 10.1126/science.1177170.
32. Spark N. and Bailey J. (2005) ‘Disarmament in Bougainville: Guns in boxes’, International Peacekeeping, 12(4), pp. 599–608. doi: 10.1080/13533310500202025.
33. Starygin S. (2013) ‘The gangs of Bougainville: Seven men, guns and a copper mine’, Journal of Conflict Transformation & Security, 3(1), pp. 55–76.
34. Stedman S. (1997) ‘Spoiler problems in peace processes’, International Security, 22(2), pp. 5–53. doi: 10.1162/isec.22.2.5.
35. Tang S. (2011) ‘The security dilemma and ethnic conflict: Toward a dynamic and integrative theory of ethnic conflict’, Review of International Studies, 37(2), pp. 511–536. doi: 10.1017/S0260210510000616.
36. Tankunani Sirivi J. and Taleo Havini M. (2004) As mothers of the land: The birth of the Bougainville women for peace and freedom. Canberra ACT: ANU Pacific Institute.
37. Theidon K. (2007) ‘Transitional subjects: The disarmament, demobilization and reintegration of former combatants in Colombia’, International Journal of Transitional Justice, 1(1), pp. 66–90. doi: 10.1093/ijtj/ijm011.
38. Wallis J. (2012) ‘Ten years of peace: Assessing Bougainville’s progress and prospects’, The Round Table: The Commonwealth Journal of International Affairs, 101(1), pp. 29–40. doi: 10.1080/00358533.2012.656028.
39. Wallis J. (2019) ‘The role of ‘uncivil’ society in transitional justice: Evidence from Bougainville and Timor-Leste’, Global Change, Peace & Security, 31(2), pp. 159–179. doi: 10.1080/14781158.2019.1585795.
40. Wood R. and Kathman J. (2015) ‘Competing for the Crown: Inter-rebel competition and civilian targeting in civil war’, Political Research Quarterly, 68(1), pp. 167–179. doi: 10.1177/1065912914563546.
41. Zena P. (2013) The Lessons and limits of DDR in Africa. Washington, DC: Africa Center for Strategic Studies.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-ff75987a-1715-4281-b477-f124934232a7