Technical and organizational improvements of packaging production process

• Autorzy: Rudawska A. , Čuboňova N. , Pomarańska K. , Stančeková D , Gola A.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12913/22998624/62513

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Due to customer driven economies, today’s world markets are characterized by high fluctuations in market demand and frequent arrival of new technologies and new products. To stay competitive in such markets manufacturing companies require continuous improvements both in technical and organizational areas of their activity. The paper presents results of the diagnosis provided in the manufacturing area of the company producing cardboard packages and recommendations to make the production process more efficient. Especially, among the proposed technical and organizational recommendations the most important ones are: automation of certain elements of the production process and changes in production plant layout.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

packaging; production process; improvements; efficiency; layout; automation

• Wydawca: Lublin University of Technology ; Polish Society of Ecological Engineering (PTIE), Branch of PTIE in Lublin
• Czasopismo: Advances in Science and Technology. Research Journal
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 10, nr 30
• Strony: 182--192
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 21 poz., fig., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Rudawska A.

• Department of Production Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka Street 36, 20-618 Lublin, Poland

autor

Čuboňova N.

• Department of Automation and Production Systems, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26 Žilina Slovak Republic

autor

Pomarańska K.

• Department of Production Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka Street 36, 20-618 Lublin, Poland

autor

Stančeková D

• Department of Machining and Production Technologies, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26 Žilina Slovak Republic

autor

Gola A.

• Department of Enterprise Organization, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka Street 38, 20-618 Lublin, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Banaszak Z., Zaremba M., Muszyński W. Constraint programming for project driven manufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics, 120, 2009, 463-475.
• 2. Bocewicz G., Nielsen I., Banaszak Z. Iterative multimodal process scheduling. Annual Reviews in Control, 38(1) 2014, 113-132.
• 3. Bromiley P., Rau D. Operations management and the resource based view: Another view. Journal of Operations Management, 41, 2016, 95-106.
• 4. Bulak M., Turkyilmaz A. Performance assessment of manufacturing SMEs: A frontier approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(5), 2014, 797-816.
• 5. Gola A., Świć A. Computer-Aided Machine Tool Selection for Focused Flexibility Manufacturing Systems Using Economical Criteria. Actual Problems of Economics, 124(10), 2011, 383-389.
• 6. Gola A., Świć A. Economic analysis of manufacturing systems configuration in the context of their productivity. Actual Problems of Economics, 162(12), 2014, 385-394.
• 7. Kádár B., Terkaj W., Sacco M. Semantic Virtual Factory supporting interoperable modelling and evaluation of production systems. CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology, 62(1), 2013, 443-446.
• 8. Kłosowski G., Gola A., Świć A. Application of Fuzzy Logic Controller for Machine Load Balancing in Discrete Manufacturing System, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9375, 2015, 256-263.
• 9. Relich M. Fuzzy project scheduling using constraint programming. Applied Computer Science, 9(1), 2013, 3-16.
• 10. Relich M., Bzdyra K. Estimating new product success with the use of intelligent systems. Foundations of Management, 6(2), 2014, 7-20.
• 11. Relich M., Świć A., Gola A. A Knowledge-Based Approach to Product Concept Screening. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 373, 2015, 341-348.
• 12. Rudawska A., Seń A., Semotiuk L. Technical and organizational aspects of production preparation on the example of door factory. Advances in Science and Technology 7(20), 2013, 42-46.
• 13. Shah R., Ward P.T. Defining and developing measures of Lean Production. Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), 2007, 785-805.
• 14. Sharma A. Collaborative product innovation: integrating elements of CPI via PLM framewerk. Computer-Aided Design, 37, 2005, 1425-1434.
• 15. Sirmon M.A., Hitt R.D. Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 2007, 273-292.
• 16. Sitek P., Wikarek J., A novel approach to decision support and optimization of group job handling for multimodal processes in manufacturing and services. IFAC - PapersOnLine 48(3) 2015, 2115-2120.
• 17. Smith F.I., Stone T.H., Kisamore J.L., Jawahar I.M., Decision-making biases and affective states: their potential impact on best practice innovation, Canadian Journal of Animal Sciences, 27, 2010, 277-291.
• 18. Sobaszek Ł., Gola A. Computer-aided production task scheduling. Applied Computer Science, 11 (4), 2015, 58-69.
• 19. Ungan M. Management support for the adoption of manufacturing best practices: key factors. International Journal of Production Research, 43(18), 2005, 3803-3820.
• 20. Source: http://www.scorpio.com.pl/PL/Oferta/Category/17/Product/328/Default.aspx, accessed: 2016.02.03.
• 21. Source: http://www.paker.eu/index.php?k=maszyny%20sztancujace, accessed: 2016.02.03.