PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Phytocenological approach in biomonitoring of the state of aquatic ecosystems in Ukrainian Polesie

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The results of a research into the scale and consequences of the degradation of aquatic ecosystems in Ukrainian Polesie have been detected in article, and the areas of increased anthropogenic pressure have been identified which greatly affect the condition and number of aquatic macrophytes. The biodiversity of sites with different anthropogenic load was evaluated using the biodiversity criteria. In the research, the structural and functional features of macrophytic species diversity within Teteriv River ecological corridor as a typical river landscape of Ukrainian Polesie were determined and described, the floristic composition was determined. Within the ecological zones, the number of species and their projective coverage in areas with different anthropogenic pressures within Teteriv River ecological corridor were determined. The basic criteria for the implementation of deferred biomonitoring based on the analysis of the dynamics of the species composition of the phytocoenoses of Teteriv River ecological corridor on the indicators of ecological stability and plasticity using the species-specific criteria, are: Margalef species richness index, Sørensen–Dice index, Shannon diversity index, Simpson’s index, and Pielou’s evenness index. Based on the results, correlation dependencies have been constructed, which will allow to obtain data on the stability of the development of aquatic ecosystems according to the data of species surveys. Interconnections between biodiversity indicators and indicators of surface water quality within the Ukrainian Polesie were found; they are the fundamental component of a long-term monitoring of the stability in the development of aquatic phytocenoses.
Wydawca
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
65--74
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 34 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • Zhytomyr National Agroecological University, Educational and Scientific Department of Ecology and Environment Protection, Staryi Blvd, 7, Zhytomyr, Zhytomyr Oblast, 10002, Ukraine
  • Zhytomyr National Agroecological University, Faculty of Forestry, Zhytomyr, Ukraine
  • Zhytomyr National Agroecological University, Faculty of Forestry, Zhytomyr, Ukraine
  • Zhytomyr National Agroecological University, Educational and Scientific Department of Ecology and Environment Protection, Staryi Blvd, 7, Zhytomyr, Zhytomyr Oblast, 10002, Ukraine
  • Zhytomyr National Agroecological University, Department of Environmental Safety and Economics of Nature Use, Zhytomyr, Ukraine
Bibliografia
  • AFANASIEV S. А. 2001. Development of European approaches to biologic evaluation of the state of hydroecosystems in the monitoring of rivers in Ukraine. Hydrobiological Journal. Vol. 5 p. 3–18. DOI 10.1615/HydrobJ.v38.i4.130
  • AKASAKA M., TAKAMURA N., MITSUHASHI H., KADONO Y. 2010. Effects of land use on aquatic macrophyte diversity and water quality of ponds. Freshwater Biology. Vol. 55. Iss. 4 p. 909–922. DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02334.x.
  • KLOCHENKO P., SHEVCHENKO T., BARINOVA S., TARASHCHUK O. 2014. Assessment of the ecological state of the Kiev Reservoir by the bioindication method. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies. Vol. 43. Iss. 3 p. 228–236. DOI 10.2478/s13545-014-0137-8.
  • BAHROUN S., CHAIB W. 2017. The quality of surface waters of the dam reservoir Mexa, Northeast of Algeria. Journal of Water and Land Development. No. 34 p. 11–19. DOI 10.1515/jwld-2017-0034.
  • BIRK S., WILLBY N. 2010. Towards harmonization of ecological quality classification: Establishing common grounds in European macrophyte assessment for rivers. Hydrobiologia. Vol. 652. Iss. 1 p. 149–163. DOI 10.1007/s10750-010-0327-3.
  • BOEDELTJE G., TER HEERDT G.N., BAKKER J.P. 2002. Applying the seedling-emergence method under waterlogged conditions to detect the seed bank of aquatic plants in submerged sediments. Aquatic Botany. Vol. 72. Iss. 2 p. 121–128. DOI 10.1016/S0304-3770(01)00224-8.
  • BUNN S.E., ARTHINGTON A.H. 2002. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management. Vol. 30. Iss. 4 p. 492–507. DOI 10.1007/s00267-002-2737-0.
  • CAO Y., BARK A.W., WILLIAMS W.P. 1996. Measuring the responses of macroinvertebrate communities to water pollution: A comparison of multivariate approaches, biotic and diversity indices. Hydrobiologia. Vol. 341. Iss. 1 p. 1–19. DOI 10.1007/BF00012298.
  • DAVARI N., JOURI M., ARIAPOUR A. 2011. Comparison of measurement indices of diversity, richness, dominance, and evenness in rangeland ecosystem (case study: Jvaherdeh-Ramesar). Journal of Rangeland Science. Vol. 2. Iss. 1 p. 389–398.
  • DIDUKH YA. P., PLIUTA P. G. 1994. Fitoindykatsiia ekolohichnykh faktoriv [Phytoindication of ecological factors]. Kyiv. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Institute of Botany pp. 280.
  • DUBYNA D. V., HEINY S., GROUDOVA Z. 1993. Makrofity – indikatoryi izmeneniy prirodnoy sredyi [Macrophytes as indicators of changes in the environment]. Kyiv. Naukova dumka pp. 434.
  • ELMQVIST T., FOLKE C., NYSTRÖM M., PETERSON G., BENGTSSON J., WALKER B., NORBERG J. 2003. Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. Vol. 1. Iss. 9 p. 488–494. DOI 10.1890/ 1540-9295(2003)001[0488:RDECAR]2.0.CO;2.
  • FEDONIUK T.P., FEDONIUK R.H., ROMANCHUK L.D., PETRUK A.A., PAZYCH V.M. 2019. The influence of landscape structure on the quality index of surface waters. Journal of Water and Land Development. No. 43 (X–XII) p. 56–63. DOI 10.2478/jwld-2019-0063.
  • FEDONIUK T.P., FEDONIUK R.H., ROMANCHUK L.D., PETRUK A.A., PAZYCH V.M. 2019. The influence of landscape structure on the quality index of surface waters. Journal of Water and Land Development. No. 43 (X–XII) p. 56–63. DOI 10.2478/jwld-2019-0063.
  • FRÄNZLE O. 2006. Complex bioindication and environmental stress assessment. Ecological Indicators. Vol. 6. Iss. 1 p. 114–136. DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.08.015.
  • GRIB I. V., GROKHOVSKAYA Y. R. 2001. Indication of the sanitaryecological state of tributaries of the Pripyat River according to cenoses of higher aquatic plants. Hydrobiological Journal. Vol. 37. Iss. 2 р. 44–57.
  • JANKOWSKA-HUFLEJT H. 2006. The function of permanent grasslands in water resources protection. Journal of Water and Land Development. No. 10 р. 55–65. DOI 10.2478/v10025-007-0005-7
  • KLEMENTOVA E., HEINIGE V. 1995. Evaluation of ecological stability of agricultural landscape. Мelioration and Water Economy. No. 5 p. 24–35.
  • KLIMENKO M., BIEDUNKOVA O. 2016. Development stability and cytogenetic homeostasis of Perca fluviatilis in the rivers of Rivne Oblast. Vestnik zoologii. No. 50(6) p. 539–546. DOI 10.1515/vzoo-2016-0061.
  • KLYMENKO M.O., BIEDUNKOVA O.O., KLYMENKO O.M., STATNYK I.I. 2018. Influence of river water quality on homeostasis characteristics of cypriniform and perciform fish. Biosystems Diversity. No. 26(1) p. 16–23. DOI 10.15421/011803.
  • KORZENIAK U., TRZCIŃSKA-TACIK H., RÓŻAŃSKI W., SZELĄG Z., WOŁEK J., KORZENIAK U. 2002. Ecological indicator values of vascular plants of Poland. Kraków. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Science. ISBN 9788385444954 pp. 183.
  • LACOUL P., FREEDMAN B. 2006. Environmental influences on aquatic plants in freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Reviews. Vol. 14. Iss. 2 p. 89–136. DOI 10.1139/A06-001.
  • MAGURRAN A.E. 2013. Ecological diversity and its measuremt. Springer Science and Business Media. Springer Netherlands pp. 180. DOI 10.1007/978-94-015-7358-0.
  • MIATKOWSKI Z., SMARZYŃSKA K. 2017. Surface water resources of small agricultural watershed in the Kujawy region, central Poland. Journal of Water and Land Development. No. 33 p. 131–140. DOI 10.1515/jwld-2017-0028.
  • MIODUSZEWSKI W. 2015. Protection of water quality in the lake situated on the agricultural area. Journal of Water and Land Development. No. 26 p. 65–71. DOI 10.1515/jwld-2015-0017.
  • NAGENDRA H. 2002. Opposite trends in response for the Shannon and Simpson indices of landscape diversity. Applied Geography. Vol. 22. Iss. 2 p. 175–186. DOI 10.1016/S0143-6228(02)00002-4.
  • ODUM YU. 1986. Ekologiya: transl. from English. Moscow. Mir. Vol. 2. ISBN 978-5-458-36248-1 pp. 376.
  • PADISAK J., BORICS G., GRIGORSZKY I., SORÓCZKI-PINTÉR É. 2006. Use of phytoplankton assemblages for monitoring ecological status of lakes within the Water Framework Directive: The assemblage index. Hydrobiologia. Vol. 553. Iss. 1 p. 1–14. DOI 10.1007/s10750-005-1393-9.
  • PROTASOV A.A. 2002. Bioraznoobrazie i ego ocenka. Konceptual'naja diversikologija [Biodiversity and its evaluation. Conceptual diversicology]. Kyiv. Institut gidrobiologii NAN Ukrainy pp. 105.
  • RASPOPOV I.М. 2000. Indikatsionnyie vozmozhnosti makrofitov [Indicating abilities of macrophytes]. Gidrobotanika-2000: materialyi pyatoy Vserossiyskoy konferentsii po vodnyim rasteniyam [Hydrobotany-2000: abstracts of the fifth all-Russian conference on aquatic plants]. Borok p. 204–205.
  • ROMANCHUCK L.D., FEDONYUK T.P., FEDONYUK R.G. 2017. Model of influence of landscape vegetation on mass transfer processes. Biosystems Diversity. Vol. 25. No. 3 p. 203–209. DOI 10.15421/011731.
  • ROMANCHUK L., FEDONYUK T., PAZYCH V., FEDONYUK R., KHANT G., PETRUK А. 2018. Assessment of the stability of aquatic ecosystems development on the basis of indicators of the macrophytes fluctuating asymmetry. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. Vol. 4. No. 11 (94) p. 54–61. DOI 10.15587/1729-4061.2018.141055.
  • ROMANENKO V., ZHUKINSKIY V. 1998. Metodyka ekolohichnoyi otsinky yakosti poverkhnevykh vod za vidpovidnymy katehoriyamy [Methodology of ecological assessment of surface water quality according to the relevant categories]. Kyiv. Symbol pp. 28.
  • SPELLERBERG I.F. 2005. Monitoring ecological change. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press pp. 412. DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511614699.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-ff0da3e9-7f41-44b5-a510-5e808d5e9597
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.