PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Relationship marketing orientation in healthcare organisations with the AHP method. Internal and external customer perspective

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Adopting the relationship marketing approach in health institutions and evaluating the weights of its dimensions will benefit the effectiveness of marketing strategies. This study aimed to determine the critical levels of relationship marketing orientation components in private health institutions using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). In the study, relationship marketing orientation was evaluated according to six criteria in line with the opinions of five experts for employees and 20 people who previously benefited from health services for their customers. As a result, the criterion with the highest priority value was communication with 0.259, and the best health company A. Furthermore, the AHP method results were compared with TOPSIS, EDAS, and CODAS methods. In addition, the Spearman Correlation method was used to determine the correlation between the results.
Rocznik
Strony
35--45
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 53 poz., rys.
Twórcy
autor
  • Department of Banking and Insurance, Muș Alparslan University Malazgirt Vocational School, Muș, Turkey
autor
  • Department of Maritime Administration Management, Ordu University Fatsa Faculty of Marine Sciences, Fatsa, Ordu, Turkey
Bibliografia
  • [1] Agarwal, P., Sahai, M., Mishra, V., Bag, M., and Singh, V. Supplier selection in dynamic environment using analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Information Engineering & Electronic Business 6, 4 (2014), 20–26.
  • [2] Altay, B. C., Okumuş, A., and Adıgüzel Mercangöz, B. An intelligent approach for analyzing the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on marketing mix elements (7Ps) of the on-demand grocery delivery service. Complex & Intelligent Systems 8, 1 (2022), 129–140.
  • [3] Baby, S. AHP modeling for multicriteria decision-making and to optimise strategies for protecting coastal landscape resources. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology 4, 2 (2013), 218–227.
  • [4] Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S. K., Yazdani, M., and Ignatius, J. A state-of-the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications 39, 17 (2012), 13051–13069.
  • [5] Benezzine, G., Zouhri, A., and Koulali, Y. AHP and GIS-based site selection for a sanitary landfill: Case of Settat province, Morocco. Journal of Ecological Engineering 23, 1 (2022), 1–13.
  • [6] Biswas, S., Pamucar, D., Kar, S., and Sana, S. S. A new integrated FUCOM–CODAS framework with fermatean fuzzy nformation for multi-criteria group decision-making. Symmetry 13, 12 (2021), 2430.
  • [7] Büyüközkan, G., Çifçi, G., and Güleryüz, S. Strategic analysis of healthcare service quality using fuzzy AHP methodology. Expert systems with applications 38, 8 (2011), 9407–9424.
  • [8] Campbell, S., Campbell-Phillips, S., and Phillips, D. Lack of communication between management and employees. SIASAT 5, 3 (2020), 32–39.
  • [9] Chang, W.-J. A., and Huang, T. C. The impact of human resource capabilities on internal customer satisfaction and organisational effectiveness. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 21, 6 (2010), 633–648.
  • [10] Darko, A., Chan, A. P. C., Ameyaw, E. E., Owusu, E. K., Pärn, E., and Edwards, D. J. Review of application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction. International Journal of Construction Management 19, 5 (2019), 436–452.
  • [11] Saaty, T. L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. TMcgraw Hill, New York, 1980.
  • [12] Duke, J. M., and Aull-Hyde, R. Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process. Ecological Economics 42, 1-2 (2002), 131–145.
  • [13] Enyinda, C. I., Ogbuehi, A. O., and Mbah, C. H. Building pharmaceutical relationship marketing and social media impact: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing 12, 2 (2018), 198–230.
  • [14] Ersoy, Y. Performance evaluation of airports during the COVID-19 pandemic. Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics 308, 4 (2021), 23–53.
  • [15] Garoma, T., and Diriba, S. Modeling and analysis of supplier selection method using analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal 3, 1 (2014), 145–151.
  • [16] Gilbert, P. The relationship of shame, social anxiety and depression: The role of the evaluation of social rank. Clinical Psychology Psychotherapy: An International Journal of Theory & Practice 7, 3 (2000), 174–189.
  • [17] Grönroos, C. Relationship marketing readiness: theoretical background and measurement directions. Journal of Services Marketing 31, 3 (2017), 218–225.
  • [18] Han, H., and Hyun, S. S. Customer retention in the medical tourism industry: Impact of quality, satisfaction, trust, and price reasonableness. Tourism Management 46 (2015), 20–29.
  • [19] Heffernan, T., O’Neill, G., Travaglione, T., and Droulers, M. Relationship marketing: The impact of emotional intelligence and trust on bank performance. International Journal of Bank Marketing 26, 3 (2008), 183–199.
  • [20] Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., and Gremler, D. D. Understanding relationship marketing outcomes: An integration of relational benefits and relationship quality. Journal of Service Research 4, 3 (2002), 230–247.
  • [21] Herington, C., Johnson, L. W., and Scott, D. Internal relationships: Linking practitioner literature and relationship marketing theory. European Business Review 18, 5 (2006), 364–381.
  • [22] Hoffman, M. L. Empathy and prosocial activism. In Social and moral values: Individual and societal perspectives, N. Eisenberg, J. Reykowski and E. Staub, Eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., (1989), pp. 65–85.
  • [23] Improta, G., Perrone, A., Russo, M. A., and Triassi, M. Health technology assessment (HTA) of optoelectronic biosensors for oncology by analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Likert scale. BMC Medical Research Methodology 19, 1 (2019), 140.
  • [24] Jain, V., Sangaiah, A. K., Sakhuja, S., Thoduka, N., and Aggarwal, R. Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS: a case study in the Indian automotive industry. Neural Computing and Applications 29, 7 (2018), 555–564.
  • [25] Jamwal, A., Agrawal, R., Sharma, M., and Kumar, V. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis in sustainable manufacturing decision making. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering 14, 3 (2021), 202–225.
  • [26] Kahraman, C., Demirel, N. Ç., and Demirel, T. Prioritization of e-Government strategies using a SWOT-AHP analysis: the case of Turkey. European Journal of Information Systems 16, 3 (2007), 284–298.
  • [27] Karaşan, A., and Kahraman, C. A novel interval-valued neutrosophic EDAS method: prioritization of the United Nations
  • national sustainable development goals. Soft Computing 22, 15 (2018), 4891–4906.
  • [28] Krejčí, J., and Stoklasa, J. Aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process: Why weighted geometric mean should be used instead of weighted arithmetic mean. Expert Systems with Applications 114 (2018), 97–106.
  • [29] Lee, J.-S., Kim, S., and Pan, S. The role of relationship marketing investments in customer reciprocity. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 26, 8 (2014), 1200–1224.
  • [30] MacMillan, K., Money, K., Money, A., and Downing, S. Relationship marketing in the not-for-profit sector: an extension and application of the commitment–trust theory. Journal of Business Research 58, 6 (2005), 806–818.
  • [31] Mathew, M., and Sahu, S. Comparison of new multi-criteria decision making methods for material handling equipment selection. Management Science Letters 8, 3 (2018), 139–150.
  • [32] Miquel-Romero, M. J., Caplliure-Giner, E. M., and Adame-Sánchez, C. Relationship marketing management: Its importance in private label extension. Journal of Business research 67, 5 (2014), 667–672.
  • [33] Morgan, R. M., and Hunt, S. D. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of marketing 58, 3 (1994), 20–38.
  • [34] Nguyen L. H, and Ngo L. V. Relationship marketing in Vietnam: An empirical study. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics 24, 2 (2012), 222–235.
  • [35] Payne, A., and Frow, P. Relationship marketing: looking backwards towards the future. Journal of Services Marketing 31, 1 (2017), 11-15.
  • [36] Saaty, R. W. The analytic hierarchy process – what it is and how it is used. Mathematical modelling 9, 3-5 (1987), 161–176.
  • [37] Saaty, T. L. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 24, 6 (1994), 19–43.
  • [38] Saaty, T. L. Transport planning with multiple criteria: The analytic hierarchy process applications and progress review. Journal of Advanced Transportation 29, 1 (1995), 81–126.
  • [39] Saaty, T. L. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences 1, 1 (2008), 83–98.
  • [40] Sadia, A., Salleh, B. M., Kadir, Z. A., and Sanif, S. The relationship between organizational communication and employees productivity with new dimensions of effective communication flow. Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies 2, 2 (2016), 93–100.
  • [41] Sin, L. Y. M., Tse, A. C. B., Yau, O. H. M., Chow, R. P. M., Lee, J. S. Y., and Lau, L. B. Y. Relationship marketing orientation: scale development and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Business Research 58, 2 (2005), 185–194.
  • [42] Sin, L. Y. M., Tse, A. C. B., Yau, O. H. M., Lee, J. S. Y., and Chow, R. P. M., The effect of relationship marketing orientation on business performance in a service-oriented economy. Journal of Services Marketing 16, 7 (2002), 656–676.
  • [43] Sin, L. Y. M., Tse, A. C. B., Chan, H., Heung, V. C., and Yim, F. H. The effects of relationship marketing orientation on business performance in the hotel industry. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research 30, 4 (2006), 407–426.
  • [44] Singh, A., and Prasher, A. Measuring healthcare service quality from patients – perspective: using fuzzy AHP application. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 30, 3-4 (2019), 284–300.
  • [45] Sousa, B. M., and Alves, G. M. The role of relationship marketing in behavioural intentions of medical tourism services and guest experiences. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights 2, 3 (2019), 224–240.
  • [46] Tehci, A., and Ersoy, Y. Firms and consumer attitudes in the digital market: analytical hierarchy process approach. In Insights, innovation, and analytics for optimal customer engagement. IGI Global, (2021), pp. 149–167.
  • [47] Vujičić, M. D., Vasiljević, D. A., Hose, T. A., Tasić, N., Morar, C., Ðurić, A., and Marković, S. B. A multi-criteria decision analysis with special reference to loess and archaeological sites in Serbia (could geosciences and archaeology cohabitate?). Open Geosciences 10, 1 (2018), 333–343.
  • [48] Wright, G. H., and Taylor, A. Strategic partnerships and relationship marketing in healthcare. Public Management Review 7, 2 (2005), 203–224.
  • [49] Wu, W.-Y., Tsai, C.-C., and Fu, C.-S. The relationships among internal marketing, job satisfaction, relationship marketing, customer orientation, and organizational performance: An empirical study of TFT-LCD companies in Taiwan. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries 23, 5 (2013), 436–449.
  • [50] Yalçin, N., and Nuşin, U. Applying EDAS as an applicable MCDM method for industrial robot selection. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences 37, 3 (2019), 779–796.
  • [51] Yau, O. H. M., Lee, J. S. Y., Chow, R. P. M., Sin, L. Y. M., and Tse A. C. B. Relationship marketing the Chinese way. Business Horizons 43, 1 (2000), 16–24.
  • [52] Yoganathan, D., Jebarajakirthy, C., and Thaichon, P. The influence of relationship marketing orientation on brand equity in banks. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 26 (2015), 14–22.
  • [53] Yu, H. S., Zhang, J. J., Kim, D. H., Chen, K. K., Henderson, C., Min, S. D., and Huang, H. Service quality, perceived value, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intention among fitness center members aged 60 years and over. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal 42, 5 (2014), 757–767.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-fedf96b0-4b42-429d-ba09-64578620a47d
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.