PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

A bioinspired optimization strategy: to minimize the travel segment of the nozzle to accelerate the fused deposition modeling process

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The fused deposition modeling process of digital printing uses a layer-by-layer approach to form a three-dimensional structure. Digital printing takes more time to fabricate a 3D model, and the speed varies depending on the type of 3D printer, material, geometric complexity, and process parameters. A shorter path for the extruder can speed up the printing process. However, the time taken for the extruder during printing (deposition) cannot be reduced, but the time taken for the extruder travel (idle move) can be reduced. In this study, the idle travel of the nozzle is optimized using a bioinspired technique called "ant colony optimization" (ACO) by reducing the travel transitions. The ACO algorithm determines the shortest path of the nozzle to reduce travel and generates the tool paths as G-codes. The proposed method’s G-code is implemented and compared with the G-code generated by the commercial slicer, Cura, in terms of build time. Experiments corroborate this finding: the G-code generated by the ACO algorithm accelerates the FDM process by reducing the travel movements of the nozzle, hence reducing the part build time (printing time) and increasing the strength of the printed object.
Rocznik
Strony
art. no. e146236
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 35 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • School of Mechanical Engineering, SASTRA Deemed University, Tamil Nadu, Thanjavur-613401, India
autor
  • School of Mechanical Engineering, SASTRA Deemed University, Tamil Nadu, Thanjavur-613401, India
  • School of Mechanical Engineering, SASTRA Deemed University, Tamil Nadu, Thanjavur-613401, India
  • School of Mechanical Engineering, SASTRA Deemed University, Tamil Nadu, Thanjavur-613401, India
Bibliografia
  • [1] Ultimaker cura: Powerful, easy-to-use 3d printing software. [On-line]. Available: https://ultimaker.com/software/ultimaker-cura
  • [2] A. Colorni, M. Dorigo, V. Maniezzo et al., “Distributed optimization by ant colonies,” in Proceedings of the first European conference on artificial life, vol. 142. Paris, France, 1991, pp. 134–142.
  • [3] Y. Weidong, “Optimal path planning in rapid prototyping based on genetic algorithm,” in 2009 Chinese Control and Decision Conference, 2009, pp. 5068–5072.
  • [4] Y. Li and S. Gong, “Dynamic ant colony optimisation for tsp,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 22, pp. 528–533, 2003.
  • [5] J. Balic and M. Korosec, “Intelligent tool path generation for milling of free surfaces using neural networks,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 1171–1179, 2002.
  • [6] P. Lechowicz, L. Koszalka, I. Pozniak-Koszalka, and A. Kasprzak, “Path optimization in 3d printer: algorithms and experimentation system,” in 2016 4th International Symposium on Computational and Business Intelligence (ISCBI). IEEE, 2016, pp. 137–142.
  • [7] N. Volpato, R. Nakashima, L. Galvao, A. Barboza, P. Benevides, and L. Nunes, “Reducing repositioning distances in fused deposition-based processes using optimization algorithms,” in High Value Manufacturing: Advanced Research in Virtual and Rapid Prototyping: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advanced Research in Virtual and Rapid Prototyping, Leiria, Portugal, 2013, p. 417.
  • [8] B. Thompson and H.-S. Yoon, “Velocity-regulated path planning algorithm for aerosol printing systems,” J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., vol. 137, no. 3, 2015.
  • [9] J. Yuan, J. Du, Z. Ma, A. Liu, and Y. He, “An optimization approach for path planning of high-quality and uniform additive manufacturing,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 92, no. 1-4, pp. 651–662, 2017.
  • [10] Y. Zhang, H. Li, T. Wang, B. Liu, and G. Wang, “A hybrid tool-path with no pause generation algorithm for 3d printing,” in J. Phys.-Conf. Ser., vol. 1754, no. 1. IOP Publishing, 2021, p. 012222.
  • [11] P.K. Wah, K.G. Murty, A. Joneja, and L.C. Chiu, “Tool path optimization in layered manufacturing,” IIE Trans., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 335–347, 2002.
  • [12] A. Papacharalampopoulos, H. Bikas, and P. Stavropoulos, “Path planning for the infill of 3d printed parts utilizing hilbert curves,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 21, pp. 757–764, 2018.
  • [13] T. Liu, S. Yuan, Y. Wang, Y. Xiong, J. Zhu, L. Lu, and Y. Tang, “Stress-driven infill mapping for 3d-printed continuous fiber composite with tunable infill density and morphology,” Addit. Manuf., vol. 62, p. 103374, 2023.
  • [14] M. Dorigo and G. Di Caro, “Ant colony optimization: a new meta-heuristic,” in Proc. of the 1999 congress on evolutionary computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406), vol. 2. IEEE, 1999, pp. 1470–1477.
  • [15] B. Fox, W. Xiang, and H.P. Lee, “Industrial applications of the ant colony optimization algorithm,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 31, pp. 805–814, 2007.
  • [16] W. Liu, L. Chen, G. Mai, and L. Song, “Toolpath planning for additive manufacturing using sliced model decomposition and metaheuristic algorithms,” Adv. Eng. Softw., vol. 149, p. 102906, 2020.
  • [17] K.-Y. Fok, C.-T. Cheng, N. Ganganath, H. H.-C. Iu, and K. T. Chi, “Accelerating 3d printing process using an extended ant colony optimization algorithm,” in 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS). IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–5.
  • [18] K.-Y. Fok, C.-T. Cheng, K. T. Chi, and N. Ganganath, “A relaxation scheme for tsp-based 3d printing path optimizer,” in 2016 International Conference on Cyber-Enabled Distributed Computing and Knowledge Discovery (CyberC). IEEE, 2016, pp. 382–385.
  • [19] H. Liu, R. Liu, Z. Liu, and S. Xu, “Minimizing the number of transitions of 3d printing nozzles using a traveling-salesman-problem optimization model,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., vol. 22, pp. 1617–1637, 2021.
  • [20] K.-Y. Fok, C.-T. Cheng, N. Ganganath, H.H.-C. Iu, and K.T. Chi, “An aco-based tool-path optimizer for 3-d printing applications,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 2277–2287, 2018.
  • [21] F. Hamzeh, F. El Sakka, M.H. Senan, and A.A. Yassin, “Optimizing 3d printing path to minimize the formation of weak bonds,” in Creative Construction Conference 2018. Budapest University of Technology and Economics, 2018, pp. 181–188.
  • [22] H. Yin, S. Wang, Y. Wang, F. Li, L. Tian, X. Xue, and Q. Jia, “An intelligent 3d printing path planning algorithm 3d printing path planning algorithm: An intelligent sub-path planning algorithm,” in 2021 the 5th International Conference on Innovation in Artificial Intelligence, 2021, pp. 241–246.
  • [23] Matlab & simulink. [Online]. Available: https://in.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html
  • [24] Solidworks. [Online]. Available: https://www.solidworks.com
  • [25] 3d cad, cam, cae & pcb cloud-based software. [Online]. Available: https://www.autodesk.in/products/fusion-360
  • [26] Thingiverse – digital designs for physical objects. [Online]. Available: https://www.thingiverse.com
  • [27] R. Skinderowicz, “The gpu-based parallel ant colony system,” J. Parallel Distrib. Comput., vol. 98, pp. 48–60, 2016.
  • [28] K. J. Christiyan, U. Chandrasekhar, and K. Venkateswarlu, “A study on the influence of process parameters on the mechanical properties of 3d printed abs composite,” in IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, vol. 114, no. 1. IOP Publishing, 2016, p. 012109.
  • [29] Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics, astm stand., vol. 08, pp. 1–15, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.astm.org/d0638-14.html
  • [30] Analyse your 3d printing g-code to provide accurate information such as print time and average speed. [Online]. Available: https: //www.gcodeanalyser.com
  • [31] M. Kocisko, M. Teliskova, J. Torok, and J. Petrus, “Postprocess options for home 3d printers,” Procedia Eng., vol. 196, pp. 1065–1071, 2017.
  • [32] C. Dudescu and L. Racz, “Effects of raster orientation, infill rate and infill pattern on the mechanical properties of 3d printed materials,” Acta Univ. Cibiniensis-Tech. Ser., vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 23–30, 2017.
  • [33] M. S. Alsoufi and A. Elsayed, “Warping deformation of desktop 3d printed parts manufactured by open source fused deposition modeling (fdm) system,” Int. J. Mech. Mechatron. Eng, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 7–16, 2017.
  • [34] A. Abbott, G. Tandon, R. Bradford, H. Koerner, and J. Baur, “Process-structure-property effects on abs bond strength in fused filament fabrication,” Addit. Manuf., vol. 19, pp. 29–38, 2018.
  • [35] K.-Y. Fok, N. Ganganath, C.-T. Cheng, H. H.-C. Iu, and K. T. Chi, “A nozzle path planner for 3-d printing applications,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 6313–6323, 2019.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-fea59e2e-31b2-4c84-ad42-6c99b9f3fc21
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.