PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Powiadomienia systemowe
  • Sesja wygasła!
  • Sesja wygasła!
Tytuł artykułu

ESG reporting framework in Poland – the current state of affairs and perspectives

Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Purpose: The purpose of the article is to systematise and present – against a background of the essence of ESG accounting – the applicable and proposed legal framework for non-financial reporting in Poland. Design/methodology/approach: The article uses qualitative research methods: the method of studying literature and legal acts, the method of analysis and synthesis, as well as the descriptive method and deductive inference. Findings: The results of the literature studies make it possible to conclude that the topic of ESG reporting is not new, but it is gaining importance, and this process will most probably continue. The growing demand and pressure for companies to be more environmentally and socially responsible are accompanied by the efforts that they make to present the best possible information in this area. To some extent, these activities are voluntary, but they are increasingly enforced by legal regulations. Non-financial information is gaining importance for various stakeholder groups, who are increasingly aware and sensitive to environmental, social and corporate governance issues. It, therefore, seems obvious that the disclosure of ESG information – in part voluntary and influencing marketing – is becoming increasingly regulated and necessary. This is evidenced by further EU regulations and their transposition into domestic legislation. Analysis of the regulations already in force and the draft CSRD Directive cited in the article clearly indicates that the European Commission has been increasing the obligations related to ESG reporting in recent years, and they will be further increased in the future. Originality/value: The value of the article is the analysis, synthesis and systematics of issues related to the essence and framework of non-financial reporting (sustainable development) in Poland, including issues related to the currently applicable and proposed European Union legislation.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
609--622
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 46 poz.
Twórcy
  • Częstochowa University of Technology, Częstochowa
Bibliografia
  • 1. Abad-Segura, E. Cortés-García, F., Belmonte-Ureña, L.J. (2019). The Sustainable Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility: A Global Analysis and Future Trends. Sustainability, 11(19), 5382. doi: 10.3390/su11195382.
  • 2. Abhayawansa, S., Guthrie, J., Bernardi, C. (2019). Intellectual capital accounting in the age of integrated reporting: a commentary. Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 20, No. 1. doi: 10.1108/JIC-12-2018-0222.
  • 3. Accounting Act of 29 September 1994, Journal of Laws 1994, No. 121, item 591 (as amended).
  • 4. Ackers, B., Eccles, N.S. (2015). Mandatory corporate social responsibility assurance practices: the case of King III in South Africa. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 28, No. 4. doi: 10.1108/AAAJ-12-2013-1554.
  • 5. Arif, M., Sajjad, A., Farooq, S., Abrar, M., Joyo, A.S. (2021). The impact of audit committee attributes on the quality and quantity of environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosures. Corporate Governance, Vol. 21, No. 3. doi: 10.1108/CG-06-2020-0243.
  • 6. Baumüller, J., Grbenic, S.O. (2021). Moving from non-financial to sustainability reporting: analyzing the EU Commission's proposal for a Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Facta Universitatis Series Economics and Organization, Vol. 18, No. 4, Special Issue, doi: 10.22190/FUEO210817026B.
  • 7. Boffo, R., Patalano, R. (2020). ESG Investing: Practices, Progress and Challenges. Paris:
  • OECD. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/finance/ESG-Investing-Practices-Progress-and-Challenges.pdf, 1.03.2022.
  • 8. Camilleri, M.A. (2015). Environmental, social and governance disclosures in Europe. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Vol. 6, No. 2. doi: 10.1108/SAMPJ-10-2014-0065.
  • 9. Casonato, F., Farneti, F., Dumay, J. (2019). Social Capital and integrated reporting: losing legitimacy when reporting talk is not supported by actions. Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 20, No. 1. doi: 10.1108/JIC-08-2018-0132.
  • 10. Chluska, J. (2017). Wpływ obowiązku ujawnień modelu biznesu na system rachunkowości przedsiębiorstw. Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiębiorstwie, No. 3(44). doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.4695.
  • 11. Communication from the Commission Guidelines on Non-Financial Reporting: Supplement on Reporting Climate-Related Information (2019). Off. J. Eur. Union, C209, 1-30 (2019/C 209/01).
  • 12. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility (2011). Brussels: European Commission, 25 October 2011, COM(2011) 681.
  • 13. Communication from the European Commission of 26 June 2017. Guidelines on non 33 financial reporting (methodology for reporting non-financial information) (2017). C(2017) 4234 final.; (2017/C 215/01).
  • 14. Dhaliwal, D.S., Li, O.Z., Tsang, A., Yang, Y.G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: the initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, Vol. 86, No. 1. doi: 10.2308/accr.00000005.
  • 15. Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups (2014). Off. J. Eur. Union L 330.
  • 16. Domańska-Szaruga, B. (2011). Rola czynników ESG w budowaniu wartości przedsiębiorstwa. Współczesne Zarządzanie, 4. Retrieved from http://31.186.81.235:8080/api/files/view/12868.pdf, 12.02.2022.
  • 17. Eccles, R.G., Krzus, M.P., Ribot, S. (2015). Meaning and momentum in the integrated reporting movement. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol. 27, No. 2. doi: 10.1111/jacf.12113.
  • 18. Edelman, E. (2020). Depicting trans spatialities. In Transvitalities. Washington, DC: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781351128025-3.
  • 19. Erkens, M., Paugam, L., Stolowy, H. (2015). Non-financial information: State of the art. and research perspectives based on a bibliometric study. Comptabilité-Contrôle-Audit, 21(3), doi: 10.3917/cca.213.0015.
  • 20. Esch, M., Schnellbächer, B., Wald, A. (2019). Does integrated reporting information influence internal decision making? An experimental study of investment behaviour. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 28, No. 4. doi: 10.1002/bse.2267.
  • 21. Fijałkowska, J. (2016). Raportowanie informacji niefinansowych zgodnie z nową dyrektywą UE 2014/95/EU jako wyzwanie dla przedsiębiorstw. Prace Naukowe UE we Wrocławiu, No. 436. doi: 10.15611/pn.2016.436.12.
  • 22. Fijałkowska, J., Krasodomska J., Macuda M., Mućko P. (2019). Sprawozdawczość niefinansowa. Regulacja i standaryzacja raportowania niefinansowego przedsiębiorstw. Szczecin: Wydawnictwo US.
  • 23. Hoang, T. (2018). The role of the integrated reporting in raising awareness of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) performance. Stakeholders, Governance and Responsibility (Developments in Corporate Governance and Responsibility), Vol. 14. Emerald Publishing. doi: 10.1108/S2043-052320180000014003.
  • 24. Ismail, T.H., El-Shaib, N.M. (2012). Impact of market and organizational determinants on voluntary disclosure in Egyptian companies. Meditari Accountancy Research, Vol. 20, No. 2. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/medapp/v20y2012i2p113-133.html, 10.03.2022.
  • 25. Kinderman, D.P. (2015). The Struggle Over the EU Non-Financial Disclosure Directive. WSI-Mitteilungen Issue, 6. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2614983. 24.01.2022.
  • 26. Krajowy Standard Rachunkowości, nr 9 „Sprawozdanie z działalności”. Appendix to the appendix to the Resolution No. 22/2017 of the Polish Accounting Standards Committee of 19 December 2017.
  • 27. Krappe, E. (2021). EU rules on sustainability reporting – A study of the initiatives regarding transparency and disclosure from a Swedish perspective. School of Economics and Management, Lund Univerity.
  • 28. Lament, M. (2017). Raportowanie informacji niefinansowych w zakładach ubezpieczeń w Polsce. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, Vol. 91(147). doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0009.8024.
  • 29. Lorenc, S., Kustra, A. (2017). Raportowanie danych niefinansowych w świetle aktualnych zmian ustawy o rachunkowości. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, No. 488. doi: 10.15611/pn.2017.488.09.
  • 30. Maroun, W. (2018). Modifying assurance practices to meet the needs of integrated reporting: the case for interpretive assurance. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 31, No. 2. doi: 10.1108/AAAJ-10-2016-2732.
  • 31. Mgbame, C.O., Aderin A., Ohalehi P., Chijoke-Mgbame A.M. (2021). Achieving Sustainability through Environmental Social Governance Reporting: Overcoming the Challenges. Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management, Vol. 9. doi: 10.1108/S1479-359820200000009002.
  • 32. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2013/34/EU, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, as regards corporate sustainability reporting. 2021/0104 (COD). Brussels, 21 April 2021, COM(2021) 189 final.
  • 33. Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (2019). Off. J. Eur. Union L.2019.317.1.
  • 34. Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment, and amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088. Off. J. Eur. Union L 198/13 of 22 June 2020.
  • 35. Sajjad, A., Eweje, G., Tappin, D. (2020). Managerial perspectives on drivers for and barriers to sustainable supply chain management implementation: evidence from New Zealand. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 29, No. 2. doi: org/10.1002/bse.2389.
  • 36. Santos, A.L., Rodrigues, L.L. (2021). Banks and Climate-Related Information: The Case of Portugal. Sustainability, 13, 12215. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112215.
  • 37. Stecko, J. (2012). CSR 1.0 a CSR 2.0 porównanie i analiza pojęć. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Rzeszowskiej, No. 285, Zarządzanie i marketing 3. doi: 10.7862/rz.2012.zim.10.
  • 38. The Act of 15 December 2016 amending the Accounting Act. Journal of Laws 2016, item 1047.
  • 39. Thomson, I. (2015). But does sustainability need capitalism or an integrated report a commentary on ‘the international integrated reporting council: a story of failure by flower. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 27. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2014.07.003.
  • 40. Tylec, A. (2018). CSR jako obszar raportowania niefinansowego w świetle rozszerzenia zakresu ujawnień. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej. Organizacja i Zarządzanie, No. 127. doi: 10.29119/1641-3466.2018.127.26.
  • 41. Tylec, A. (2020). Non-Financial Reporting in Poland – Standards and First Experience of Companies Related to the Implementation of Directive 2014/95/EU. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej. Organizacja i Zarządzanie, No. 144. doi: 10.29119/1641-3466.2020.144.47.
  • 42. Tylżanowski, R., Leoński, W. (2018). Ład korporacyjny, a innowacyjność podmiotów gospodarczych. Studia i Prace WNEiZ US, No. 52/1. doi: https://doi.org/10.18276/sip.2018.52/1-09.
  • 43. Werzbicka, A. (2018). Trendy światowe w obszarze ładu korporacyjnego jako remedium na kryzysy finansowe. Studia Ekonomiczne, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, No. 352. Retrieved from https://www.ue.katowice.pl/fileadmin/user_upload/wydawnictwo/SE_Artyku%C5%82y_341_360/SE_352/22.pdf, 1.03.2022.
  • 44. Wilburn, K., Wilburn, R. (2013). Using global reporting initiative indicators for CSR programs. Journal of Global Responsibility, 4(1). doi: 10.1108/20412561311324078.
  • 45. Wood, J. (2020). Why this moment could be decisive for tackling climate change: Report. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/07/how-covid-19-could-spark 20 climate-change-recovery-sustainability/, 21 February 2022.
  • 46. Żychlewicz, M. (2015). Społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu jako strategia prowadzenia działalności polskich przedsiębiorstw. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Szczecnie, No. 858, Współczesne problemy ekonomiczne, No. 11. doi: 10.18276/wpe.2015.11-26
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-fe9093dd-0634-47cb-bb38-76257e56d8c0
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.