Maritime Traffic Situations in Bornholmsgat

• Autorzy: Olindersson F. , Janson C. E. , Dahlmann J.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.09.01.14

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Maritime traffic situations is regulated in the Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGs), but how well are these rules followed by officers on board vessels? When the world shipping fleet grow and the traffic becomes more intensive, the risk of collision increase. By analysing AIS data from vessels in the traffic separation scheme Bornholmsgat during 24 hours in December 2013, 421 traffic situations were found where the passing distance between the vessels were less than 1.5 nautical miles. The compliance with the Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGs) seems to be good, but the average avoiding action is less than the recommended manoeuver.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Maritime Traffic; Baltic Sea; Bornholmsgat; COLREGs; AIS Data; Automatic Identification System (AIS); Collision Avoidance; Traffic Separation Scheme (TSS)

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 9, no. 1
• Strony: 115--120
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 12 poz, rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Olindersson F.

• Department of Shipping and Marine Technology, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden

autor

Janson C. E.

• Department of Shipping and Marine Technology, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden

autor

Dahlmann J.

• Department of Shipping and Marine Technology, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden

Bibliografia

• 1 Belcher, P. (2007). Rule Following Behaviour in Collision Avoidance ‐ a study of navigational practices in the Dover Strait. (PhD), Cardiff University.
• 2 Chauvin, C., & Lardjane, S. (2008). Decision making and strategies in an interaction situation: Collision avoidance at sea. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 11(4), 259‐269. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2008.01.001
• 3 Cockcroft, A. N., & Lameijer, J. N. F. (2012). A Guide to the Collision Avoidance Rules (7th ed.). Oxford, UK: Butterworth‐Heinemann.
• 4 Felski, A., & Jaskólski, K. (2013). The Integrity of Information Received by Means of AIS During Anticollision Manoeuvring. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 7(1), 95‐100.
• 5 Gucma, L., Antoniewicz, M., Artyszuk, J., Bak, A., Gucma, M., Gucma, S., .. Zalewski, P. (2007). Baltic Master Report ‐ General Assumptions of the Ship Safety on Southern and Western Baltic Sea: Maritime University of Szczecin.
• 6 Gucma, L., & Puszcz, A. (2010). Ships’ traffic analysis in north of Bornholm Traffic Separation Scheme (TSS Bornholmsgat) by statistical methods. Scientific Journals Maritime University of Szczecin, 21, 46‐51.
• 7 Habberley, J. S., & Taylor, D. H. (1989). Simulated Collision Avoidance Manoeuvres: a Parametric Study. THE JOURNAL OF NAVIGATION, 42(02), 248‐254.
• 8 Hajduk, J., & Montewka, J. (2008). Safety of Vessels’ Traffic, Bound for Polish Ports. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 2(2), 131‐134.
• 9 IMO. (2006). Resolution A.977(24) ‐ Shipsʹ Routeing.
• 10 Kobayashi, H. (2006). Standard Marinerʹs Behavior in Avoiding Collision Maneuver. Paper presented at the International Conference on Marine Simulation and Ship Manoeuvrability (MARSIM) ʹ06, Terschelling, TheNetherlands.
• 11 Zhao, J., Price, W. G., Wilson, P. A., & Tan, M. (1995). The uncertainty and uncoordination of marinersʹ behaviour in collision avoidance at sea. Journal of Navigation, 48(3), 425‐435.
• 12 Zhao, J., Price, W. G., Wilson, P. A., & Tan, M. (1996). A statistical study of marinersʹ behaviour in collision avoidance at sea. Paper presented at the International Conference on Marine Simulation and Ship Manoeuvrability (MARSIM) ʹ96 Copenhagen, Denmark