Influence of the variety of steel tube materials on the impedance behavior of non-destructive eddy current testing

• Autorzy: Ziani Djamel , Bendimerad Salah-Eddine , Ayad Abdelghani

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29354/diag/163092

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This article describes the effects of non-destructive eddy current testing (ECT) on steel pipes. To improve the accuracy of ECT, it is considered important to use numerical analysis. However, we propose finite element modeling for eddy current testing of cracked pipes. The end of this paper describes the results of finite element modeling and numerical analysis for eddy current testing of cracked steel pipes. The results obtained from this method are very similar and consistent with the experimental data. It is proved that the simulation method is also valid for other work.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

eddy current testing; finite element method; steel tube; TEAM workshop

PL

rura stalowa; badanie wiroprądowe; metoda elementów skończonych

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Diagnostyki Technicznej
• Czasopismo: Diagnostyka
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 24, No. 2
• Strony: art. no. 2023207
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 18 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Ziani Djamel

• APELEC Laboratory, Electrical Engineering Department, Djillali Liabes University of Sidi Bel-Abbes, Algeria

autor

Bendimerad Salah-Eddine

• APELEC Laboratory, Electrical Engineering Department, Djillali Liabes University of Sidi Bel-Abbes, Algeria

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2937-3954

autor

Ayad Abdelghani

• APELEC Laboratory, Electrical Engineering Department, Djillali Liabes University of Sidi Bel-Abbes, Algeria

Bibliografia

• 1. Pichenot G, Sollier T. Eddy current modelling for nondestructive testing. Proceeding of 8th European Conference on Non-destructive testing, Barcelona 2002.
• 2. Rachek M, Féliachi M. Modélisation par ef des phenomenes magnetodynamique harmonique 3D avec la formulation AV-A. 1st International Symposium on Electromagnetism, Satellites and Cryptography ISESC’05 2005.
• 3. Srairi K, Bendjima B, Feliachi M. Numerical coupling models for analyzing dynamic behavior of electromagnetic actuator. ELECTRIMAC’S 1996; 467-472. https://doi.org/10.1109/20.717852.
• 4. Perrin-Bit R, Coulomb JL. A three-dimensional finite element mesh connection for problems involving movement. IEEE Transaction on Magnetics 1995; 31(3): 1920-1923. https://doi.org/10.1109/20.376415.
• 5. Kyrgiazoglou A, Theodoulidis T. Simulation of Eddy Current Non-destructive testing using COMSOL multiphysics. Comsol multiphysics conference rotterdam 2017.
• 6. Dehzi C, Shao KR, Jianni S, Yan WL. Eddy current interaction with a thin-opening crack in a plate conductor, Compumag Sapporo Japan 1999; 25-28.
• 7. Turner LR. Solving TEAM problem 8 (slot in a plate) on a PC with ELEKTRA. TEAM Workshop, Okayama University1996.
• 8. Burke SK. A benchmark problem for computation of DZ in eddy-current nondestructive evaluation (NDE). Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation 1988; 7: 35-41.
• 9. Sakellaris JK, Prassianakis J, Tsamasphyros G, Hoon Shin Y, Young Seo H. Verification of Computational Electromagnetic Programs - The Special Case of TEAM Workshop Problem 15 (Rectangular Slot in a Thick Plate): Presentation of a Problem in NonDestructive Evaluation, 4th International Conference on NDT 2007; 13(2).
• 10. Reboud C, Prémel D, Pichenot G, Lesselier D, Bisiaux B. Development and validation of a 3D model dedicated to eddy current non-destructive testing of tubes by encircling probes. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics 2007; 25: 313-317.
• 11. Skarlatos A, Pichenot G, Lesselier D, Lambert M, Duchêne B. Electromagnetic modeling of a damaged ferromagnetic metal tube via a volume integral formulation. IEEE Transaction on Magnetics 2008; 44(5): 623-632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2008.918206.
• 12. Shi Y, Zhang C, Li R, Cai M. Guanwei J. Theory and application of magnetic flux leakage pipeline detection. Sensors 2015; 15(12): 31036-31055. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s151229845.
• 13. Rifai D, Abdalla AN, Razali R, Ali K. Faraj MA. An eddy current testing platform system for pipe defect inspection based on an optimized eddy current technique probe design. Sensors 2017; 17: 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17030579.
• 14. Bakhtiari S, Kupperman DS. Modelling of eddy current probe response for steam generator tubes. Nuclear Engineering and Design 1999;194: 57-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(99)00169-7.
• 15. Bisiaux B, Maurice L. Comparison of two eddy current simulation methods in steel pipes. The 12th International Conference of the Slovenian Society for Non-Destructive Testing, Application of Contemporary Non-Destructive Testing in Engineering 2013.
• 16. Chen D, Shao KR, Lavers JD. Very fast numerical analysis of benchmark models of eddy-current testing for steam generator tube. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 2002; 38(5): 2355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/INTMAG.2002.1000736.
• 17. Takagi T, Tani J, Fukutomi H, Hashimoto M. Finite element modeling of eddy current testing of steam generator tube with crack and deposit. Review of Progress in Quantitative Non-Destructive Evaluation 1997; 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5947-4_34.
• 18. Santandrea L, Le Bihan Y. Using COMSOLmultiphysics in an eddy current non-destructive testing context. Excerpt from the Proceedings of the COMSOL Conference 2010 Paris.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).