Optimal trajectories planning in an upper airspace

• Autorzy: Krzyżanowski M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The concept of target function for calculating optimal trajectories and results related to an upper airspace capacity from computer simulations are presented in this paper. The basic model of Free Route Airspace (FRA), role of conflict free and efficient flight route planning as a part of introduction working programme – Step 2, “Trajectory – based Operations” in Single European Sky ATM Research Programme are also presented. Free Route Airspace is defined as specific airspace within which users shall freely plan their routes between an entry point and an exit point without reference to the ATS route network.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

optimal trajectories planning; upper airspace capacity; free route airspace

PL

planowanie optymalnych trajektorii; przestrzeń powietrzna górna; wolna przestrzeń powietrzna

• Wydawca: Polskie Stowarzyszenie Telematyki Transportu
• Czasopismo: Archives of Transport System Telematics
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Vol. 7, iss. 1
• Strony: 14--18
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 15 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Krzyżanowski M.

• Polish Air Navigation Services Agency - PANSA, Wieżowa 8, 02-147 Warszawa, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] DURAND N., ALLIOT J.-M.: Ant Colony Optimization for Air Traffic Conflict Resolution. Eighth USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar (ATM 2009).
• [2] EUROCONTROL: Eight-States Free Route Airspace Project - Free Route Airspace Concept edition 2.0, 18 February 2002.
• [3] EUROCONTROL, EUROPEAN COMMISSION: The Roadmap for Sustainable Air Traffic Management SESAR Master Plan, October 2012.
• [4] GREEN S.M., BILIMORIA K.D., BALLIN M.G.: Distributed air/ground traffic management for en-route flight operations. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 2001, no. 9(4), pp. 259-285.
• [5] IDRIS H. DELAHAYE D.: Distributed Trajectory Flexibility Preservation for Traffic Complexity Mitigation, Eighth USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar (ATM 2009).
• [6] KETTUNEN T., HUSTACHE J.-C., FULLER I., HOWELL D., BONN J., KNORR D.: Flight efficiency studies in Europe and the United States. USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, 2005.
• [7] KROZEL J., KLIMENKO V., SHARMAN R.: Analysis of Clear-Air Turbulence Avoidance Maneuvers. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 2011, vol. 19, pp. 147-168.
• [8] KRZYŻANOWSKI M.: Metoda planowania tras przelotu statków powietrznych w górnej przestrzeni (The method of planning flight routes in the upper airspace), Rozprawa doktorska Warszawa 2011 [in Polish].
• [9] MAJUMDAR A., OCHIENG W.Y.: The factors affecting airspace capacity in Europe: a framework methodology based on cross sectional time-series analysis using simulated controller workload data. USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, 2005.
• [10] MALARSKI M.: Metoda wyznaczania przepustowości sektora kontroli ruchu lotniczego. Journal of Aeronautica Integra, 2007, nr 2, pp. 43-50 [in Polish].
• [11] MALARSKI M.: Pewna metoda sterowania trajektorią lotu w przestrzeni lotów swobodnych. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej, Automatyka, 2006, nr 145, pp. 139-146 [in Polish].
• [12] SKORUPSKI J.: Wymiarowanie płynności ruchu lotniczego. Prace Naukowe Politechniki Radomskiej, Transport, 2004, nr 20, pp. 493-498 [in Polish].
• [13] SKORUPSKI J.: Metoda przestrzeni złożonych jako narzędzie wymiarowania bezpieczeństwa ruchu lotniczego. Computer Systems Aided Science, Industry and Transport, 2006, vol. 2, pp. 277-282.
• [14] SKORUPSKI J.: Measuring of controlled air traffic safety. Archives of Transport, 2007, vol. 19, pp. 177-191.
• [15] VERSTEEGT H.H., VISSER H.G.: Traffic complexity based conflict resolution. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 2003, no. 11(2), pp.103-122.