PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Perceived green human resource management among employees in manufacturing firms

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Postrzegane zielone zarządzanie zasobami ludzkimi wśród pracowników firm produkcyjnych
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The present study aims to examine the relationship between perceived Green Human Resource Management (GHRM), employee engagement, job performance, perceived organizational support (POS), and turnover intention. This study designed using quantitative approach through a self-administered questionnaire. A total 202 employees have participated and collected by using snowball sampling procedure. The data analysed by using partial least squares-structural equation modelling and assisting the SmartPLS-3. Drawing on the social exchange theory, the results revealed that the effect of perceived GHRM on both outcome variables is mediated by employee engagement. Secondly, perceived GHRM is significant predictor of employee engagement. Moreover, POS is found significant moderator between employee engagement and both outcome variables. The findings of this study advocate that manufacturing industry must pay greater attention to GHRM practices as employees treat them as the reciprocal process which helps organizations to escalate employees’ engagement level and decreases voluntary turnover rate. Overall, the study helps the stakeholders to understand the importance of social support of organization in implementing GHRM practices and how it shapes employee’s behaviour.
PL
Niniejsze badanie ma na celu zbadanie związku między postrzeganym zielonym zarządzaniem zasobami ludzkimi (GHRM), zaangażowaniem pracowników, wydajnością pracy, postrzeganym wsparciem organizacyjnym (POS) i intencją rotacji. Niniejsze badanie zostało zaprojektowane przy użyciu podejścia ilościowego za pomocą kwestionariusza do samodzielnego wypełnienia. W sumie 202 pracowników wzięło udział w badaniu i zebrało je za pomocą procedury pobierania próbek w kształcie kuli śnieżnej. Dane przeanalizowano przy użyciu modelowania równań strukturalnych metodą najmniejszych kwadratów i wspomagania SmartPLS-3. Opierając się na teorii wymiany społecznej, wyniki ujawniły, że wpływ postrzeganego GHRM na obie zmienne wynikowe jest mediowany przez zaangażowanie pracowników. Po drugie, postrzegany GHRM jest istotnym predyktorem zaangażowania pracowników. Co więcej, POS jest znaczącym moderatorem między zaangażowaniem pracowników a obiema zmiennymi wynikowymi. Wyniki tego badania wskazują, że przemysł wytwórczy musi zwracać większą uwagę na praktyki GHRM, ponieważ pracownicy traktują je jako wzajemny proces, który pomaga organizacjom w zwiększaniu poziomu zaangażowania pracowników i zmniejszaniu wskaźnika dobrowolnej rotacji. Ogólnie rzecz biorąc, badanie pomaga interesariuszom zrozumieć znaczenie wsparcia społecznego organizacji we wdrażaniu praktyk GHRM i sposobu, w jaki kształtuje ono zachowanie pracowników.
Rocznik
Strony
470--486
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 61, rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • Universiti Malaysia Terengganu
  • Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science & Technology, Pakistan
  • Universiti Sains Malaysia
  • GEMS International School, Malaysia
  • Universiti Malaysia Terengganu
  • Universiti Malaysia Terengganu
Bibliografia
  • 1.Albrecht, S. L., Marty, A., (2020). Personality, self-efficacy and job resources and their associations with employee engagement, affective commitment and turnover intentions. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(5), 657-681.
  • 2.Alfes, K., Truss, C., Soane, E. C., Rees, C. and Gatenby, (2013a). The relationship between line manager behaviour, perceived HRM practices, and individual performance: Examining the mediating role of engagement. Human Resource Management, 52 (6), 839-859.
  • 3.Alfes, K., Shantz, A. D., Truss, C. and Soane, E. C., (2013b). The link between perceived human resource management practices, engagement and employee behaviour: a moderated mediation model. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(20, 330-351.
  • 4.Ansari, N. Y., Farrukh, M. and Raza, A., (2020). Green human resource management and employee pro-environmental behaviours: Examining the underlying mechanism. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
  • 5.Anwar, N., Mahmood, N. H. N., Yusliza, M. Y., Ramayah, T., Faezah, J. N. and Khalid, W., (2020). Green Human Resource Management for organisational citizenship behaviour towards the environment and environmental performance on a university campus. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 1-13.
  • 6.Blau, P. M., (1964). Justice in social exchange. Sociological Inquiry, 34(2), 193-206.
  • 7.Chaudhary, R., (2020). Green human resource management and employee green behavior: An empirical analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27 (2), 630-641.
  • 8.Chaudhary, R., (2019) In Press. Effects of green human resource management: testing a moderated mediation model. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management.
  • 9.Cheng, J-C., O-Yang, Y., (2018). Hotel employee job crafting, burnout, and satisfaction: The moderating role of perceived organizational support. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 72, 78-85.
  • 10.Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L. and Newsted, P. R., (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189-217.
  • 11.Choi, Y., (2020). Workplace ostracism and work-to-family conflict among female employees: Moderating role of perceived organisational support. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.
  • 12.Cote, K., Lauzier, M. and Stinglhamber, F., (In Press). The relationship between presenteeism and job satisfaction: A mediated moderation model using work engagement and perceived organizational support. European Management Journal.
  • 13.Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R. and Hall, A. V., (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 479-516.
  • 14.Dumont, J., Shen, J. and Deng, X., (2017). Effects of green HRM practices on employee workplace green behavior: The role of psychological green climate and employee green values. Human Resource Management, 56(4), 613-627.
  • 15.Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S. and Sowa, D., (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500-507.
  • 16.Fawehinmi, O., Yusliza, M. Y., Mohamad, Z., Noor Faezah, J. and Muhammad, Z., (2020). Assessing the green behaviour of academics: The role of green human resource management and environmental knowledge, International Journal of Manpower, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.
  • 17.Franke, G., Sarstedt, M., (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: a comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29(3), 430-447.
  • 18.Gholami, H., Rezaei, G., Mat Saman, M. Z., Sharif, S. and Zakuan, N., (2016). State-ofthe-art green HRM system: Sustainability in the sports center in Malaysia using a multimethods approach and opportunities for future research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 124, 142-163.
  • 19.Guan, X., Frenkel, S., (2018). How HR practice, work engagement and job crafting influence employee performance. Chinese Management Studies, 12(3), 591-607.
  • 20.Hair, J. F., Howard, M. C. and Nitzl, C., (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101-110.
  • 21.Henseler, J., Chin, W. W., (2010). A Comparison of Approaches for the Analysis of Interaction Effects Between Latent Variables Using Partial Least Squares Path Modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 17(19), 82–109.
  • 22.Jabbour, C. J. C., (2011). How green are HRM practices, organizational culture, learning and teamwork? A Brazilian study. Industrial and Commercial Training, 43(2), 98-105.
  • 23.Jabbour, C. J. C., (2013). Environmental training in organisations: From a literature review to a framework for future research. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 74, 144-155.
  • 24.Jabbour, C. J. C., Santos, F. C. A., (2008). The central role of human resource management in the search for sustainable organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(12), 2133-2154.
  • 25.Kim, M., Kim, J., (2020). Corporate social responsibility, employee engagement, well-being and the task performance of frontline employees. Management Decision. Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.
  • 26.Kim, Y. J., Kim, W. G., Choi, H. M. and Phetvaroon, K., (2019). The effect of green human resource management on hotel employees’ eco-friendly behavior and environmental performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 76, 83- 93.
  • 27.Kim, M. S., Koo, D. W., (2017). Linking LMX, engagement, innovative behavior, and job performance in hotel employees. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(12), 3044-3062.
  • 28.Kock, N., Lynn, G., (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of Association for Informations Systems, 13(7), 546-580.
  • 29.Luu, T. T., (2020): Integrating green strategy and green human resource practices to trigger individual and organizational green performance: The role of environmentally specific servant leadership. Journal of Sustainable Tourism.
  • 30.Luu, T. T., (2018). Employees’ green recovery performance: the roles of green HR practices and serving culture. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(8), 1308-1324.
  • 31.Malik, S. Y., Cao, Y., Mughal, Y. H., Kundi, G. M., Mughal, M. H. and Ramayah, T., (2020). Pathways towards sustainability in organizations: Empirical evidence on the role of green human resource management practices and green intellectual capital. Sustainability, 12 (8), 3228.
  • 32.Memon, M. A., Salleh, R. and Baharom, M. N. R., (2016). The link between training satisfaction, work engagement and turnover intention. European Journal of Training and Development, 40(6), 407-429.
  • 33.Memon, M. A., Salleh, R., Mirza, M. Z., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Ahmad, M.S. and Tariq, A., (2020). Satisfaction matters: the relationships between HRM practices, work engagement and turnover intention, International Journal of Manpower, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.
  • 34.Memon, M. A., Salleh, R., Nordin, S. M., Cheah, J. H., Ting, H. and Chuah, F., (2018). Person-organisation fit and turnover intention: the mediating role of work engagement. Journal of Management Development, 37(3), 285-298.
  • 35.Mousa, S. K., Othman, M., (2020). The impact of green human resource management practices on sustainable, performance in healthcare organisations: A conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243, 118595.
  • 36.Muñoz-Pascual, L., Galende, J., (2017). The impact of knowledge and motivation management on creativity. Employee Relations 39(5), 732-752.
  • 37.Muster, V., Schrader, U., (2011). Gree work-life balance: A new perspective for Green HRM. German Journal of Research in Human Resource Management 25(2), 140-156.
  • 38.Obeidat, S. M., Al Bakri, A. A. and Elbanna, S., (2020). Leveraging “Green” human resource practices to enable environmental and organizational performance: Evidence from the Qatari oil and gas industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 164, 371-388.
  • 39.Ojo, A. O. Raman, M., (2019). Role of green HRM practices in employees’ pro-environmental IT practices. World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, 678-688.
  • 40.Pham, N. T., Thanh, T. V., Tučková, Z. and Thuy, V. T. N., (2020) The role of green human resource management in driving hotel’s environmental performance: Interaction and mediation analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 88, 102392.
  • 41.Preacher, K. J., Hayes, A. F., (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, Vol. 36 No. 4, 717-731.
  • 42.Preacher, K. J., Hayes, A. F., (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.
  • 43.Ramayah, T., Cheah, J., Chuah, F., Ting, H. and Memon, M. A., (2018). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 3.0: An Updated Guide and Practical Guide to Statistical Analysis (2nd ed.). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Pearson.
  • 44.Ren, S., Tang, G. and Jackson, (2018). Green human resource management research in emergence: A review and future directions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35, 769-803.
  • 45.Ringle, C. M., Wende, S. and Becker, J.-M., (2015). "SmartPLS 3." Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH, http://www.smartpls.com
  • 46.Saks, A. M., (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619.
  • 47.Shin, Y., Hur, W-M. and Choi, W-H., (2020). Coworker support as a double-edged sword: A moderated mediation model of job crafting, work engagement, and job performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31 (11), 1417-1438.
  • 48.Shmueli, G., Ray, S., Velasquez Estrada, J. M. and Chatla, S. B., (2016). The Elephant in the Room: Predictive Performance of PLS Models. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4552-4564.
  • 49.Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J., Cheah, J., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S. and Ringle, C., (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322-2347.
  • 50.Song, M., Zhu, S., Wang, J. and Zhao, J., (2020). Share green growth: Regional evaluation of green output performance in China. International Journal of Production Economics, 219, 152-163.
  • 51.Thatcher, J. B., Stepina, L. P. and Boyle, R. J., (2002). Turnover of information technology workers: Examining empirically the influence of attitudes, job characteristics, and external markets. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(3), 231-261.
  • 52.Van De Voorde, K., Paauwe, J. and Van Veldhoven, M., (2012). Employee well‐ being and the HRM–organizational performance relationship: a review of quantitative studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(4), 391-407.
  • 53.Williams, L. J., Anderson, S. E., (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617.
  • 54.Yong, J. Y., Yusliza, M. Y., Ramayah, T. and Fawehinmi, O., (2019a). Nexus between green intellectual capital and green human resource management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 364-374.
  • 55.Yong, J. Y., Yusliza, M. Y. and Fawehinmi, O. O., (2019b). Green human resource management. A systematic literature review from 2007 to 2019. Benchmarking: An International Journal.
  • 56.Yong, J. Y., Yusliza, M. Y., Ramayah, T., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Sehnem, S. and Mani, V., (2020). Pathways towards sustainability in manufacturing organizations: Empiricalevidence on the role of green human resource management. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(1), 212-228.
  • 57.Yu, W., Chavez, R., Feng, M., Wong, C. Y. and Fynes, B., (2020). Green human resource management and environmental cooperation: An ability-motivation-opportunity and contingency perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 219, 24-235.
  • 58.Yusliza, M.Y., Norazmi, N. A., Jabbour, C. J. C., Fernando, Y., Fawehinmi, O. and Seles, B. M. R. P., (2019). Top management commitment, corporate social responsibility and green human resource management: A Malaysia study. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26 (6), 2051-2078.
  • 59.Yusliza, M. Y., Othman, N. Z. and Jabbour, C. J. C., (2017). Deciphering the implementation of green human resource management in an emerging economy. Journal of Management Development, 36(10), 1230-1246.
  • 60.Yusliza, M. Y., Yong, J. Y., Tanveer, M. I., Ramayah, T., Faezah, J. N. and Muhammad, Z., (2020). A structural model of the impact of green intellectual capital on sustainable performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 249, 119334.
  • 61.Zailani, S., Jeyaraman, K., Vengadasan, G. and Premkumar, R., (2012). Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) in Malaysia. A survey. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 330-340.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-fdbf76c0-0ea1-4bed-afbe-a8c2264db246
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.